Maharaji's rather graphic definition of surrender - Jump in the well
Re: Rawat DID clarify surrender! -- JHB	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: Steve ® 08/01/2005, 07:34:24 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

In the link below from the Forum 8 Gallery, click the "Surrender to Maharaji Ji and do whatever he says" image.  Here is how Maharaj Ji defines surrender. Please keep in mind that these are Maharaji's own words.        Once we have Knowledge it shouldn’t be difficult, because we are all premies, we are bound by the same love of Maharaji Ji. So we can really do it. And if we come to the point where we do whatever Maharaji Ji wants us to do, then if he says, “Jump in the well,” we’ll jump in it without saying, “Maharaji Ji, this is a well. I don’t know how to swim.” Maharaji just wants us to surrender completely.        And what surrender completely means is surrender completely. If you are really one with Guru Maharaji Ji that you’ll say, “Even if I die, I will have so much oneness with him that I will still live in him.” Then there is only Maharaji Ji.   A pretty explicit definition of surrender don't you think. Not much room for interpretation there. I'd like to see jonx try to weasel his way out of this one. Related link: http://gallery.forum8.org/surrender.htm Modified by Steve at Mon, Aug 01, 2005, 09:01:31

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Ecellent, Steve. I wonder how we could have "misinterpreted" that? --- Joe ( Mon, Aug 01, 2005, 11:40:56 ) ( 802 bytes ) +1 Re: Ecellent, Steve. I wonder how we could have "misinterpreted" that? --- Steve ( Mon, Aug 01, 2005, 12:03:25 ) ( 418 bytes ) +1 Steve, that's also the biggest reason for me. --- Joe ( Mon, Aug 01, 2005, 16:29:00 ) ( 733 bytes ) +2 Re: Steve, that's also the biggest reason for me. --- PatD ( Mon, Aug 01, 2005, 17:58:01 ) ( 693 bytes ) Re: Steve, that's also the biggest reason for me. --- jonx ( Tue, Aug 02, 2005, 17:51:48 ) ( 638 bytes ) +4 Bilmey, you are in a cult. Very sad. (no text) --- Joe ( Tue, Aug 02, 2005, 19:58:09 ) ( 0 bytes ) +2 Re: Bilmey, you are in a cult. Very sad. --- Joe ( Tue, Aug 02, 2005, 20:01:58 ) ( 758 bytes ) +1 Re: Bilmey, you are in a cult. Very sad. --- jonx ( Fri, Aug 05, 2005, 07:52:34 ) ( 5150 bytes ) Okay, okay... I'm in a cult!! --- jonx ( Fri, Aug 05, 2005, 07:51:42 ) ( 199 bytes ) img So why read here then? --- Anna ( Wed, Aug 03, 2005, 02:31:59 ) ( 380 bytes ) Re: Steve, that's also the biggest reason for me. --- Jean-Michel ( Wed, Aug 03, 2005, 03:45:54 ) ( 525 bytes ) How bent out of shape Jonx? --- hamzen ( Wed, Aug 03, 2005, 06:12:21 ) ( 936 bytes ) +3 Hi Ham --- Jethro ( Wed, Aug 03, 2005, 08:52:50 ) ( 232 bytes ) An offer for Jonx and current premies --- Danny ( Wed, Aug 03, 2005, 08:57:53 ) ( 1603 bytes ) +2 Re: An offer for Jonx and current premies --- Steve ( Sun, Aug 07, 2005, 07:41:47 ) ( 641 bytes ) Scuze me Mr. Dan but... --- jonx ( Sun, Aug 07, 2005, 10:20:04 ) ( 679 bytes ) img +2 Actually he wouldn't exist without us --- hamzen ( Sun, Aug 07, 2005, 19:50:32 ) ( 343 bytes ) +1 Re: Actually he wouldn't exist without us --- jonx ( Mon, Aug 08, 2005, 12:51:16 ) ( 803 bytes ) +1 There you go with the spiritual assumptions again --- hamzen ( Mon, Aug 08, 2005, 13:44:12 ) ( 891 bytes ) Re: Scuze me Mr. Dan but... --- Danny ( Wed, Aug 10, 2005, 16:28:42 ) ( 424 bytes ) Re: How bent out of shape Jonx? I#ll ask again --- hamzen ( Mon, Aug 08, 2005, 03:30:17 ) ( 53 bytes ) +1 Re: How bent out of shape Jonx? I#ll ask again --- jonx ( Mon, Aug 08, 2005, 12:54:52 ) ( 50 bytes ) +1 Do you usually make comments about people --- hamzen ( Mon, Aug 08, 2005, 13:47:49 ) ( 223 bytes ) Jumping in the well.......and the abuse of "surrendering" --- Lexy ( Mon, Aug 01, 2005, 12:07:07 ) ( 1553 bytes ) link +2 Re: Jumping in the well.......and the abuse of "surrendering" --- shelagh ( Mon, Aug 01, 2005, 16:27:18 ) ( 473 bytes ) Re: Jumping in the well.......and the abuse of "surrendering" --- PatD ( Mon, Aug 01, 2005, 19:17:11 ) ( 763 bytes ) Surrender is what everybody is looking for -- but to what? --- jonx ( Tue, Aug 02, 2005, 17:13:17 ) ( 1310 bytes ) +2 Re: Surrender is what everybody is looking for -- but to what? --- Steve ( Tue, Aug 02, 2005, 20:51:36 ) ( 3506 bytes ) No need for a 'master' or anybody else to let go inside --- Jean-Michel ( Wed, Aug 03, 2005, 05:13:15 ) ( 230 bytes )