Ecellent, Steve. I wonder how we could have "misinterpreted" that?
Re: Maharaji's rather graphic definition of surrender - Jump in the well -- Steve	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: Joe ® 08/01/2005, 11:40:56 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

The world of Jonx and any other Rawat cult-member is this: "Rawat is always right and NEVER wrong.  So, if you find something that is embarrassing, derrogatory, or contradictory to how Rawat is trying to portray himself in his current PR campaign, then you must have "misinterpreted" it, and I, as a cult member do not care how stupid or ridiculous I sound by saying that."" The following is the first commandment of the Rawat cult member: "Also, I will NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, criticize Prem Rawat. I cannot, I will not; it scares the crap out of me to even think of doing so." But as we all know, NO ONE is perfect, NO ONE is beyond error, and this commandment is the numero uno fact that makes the Rawat cult a cult. Modified by Joe at Mon, Aug 01, 2005, 11:44:19

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Re: Ecellent, Steve. I wonder how we could have "misinterpreted" that? --- Steve ( Mon, Aug 01, 2005, 12:03:25 ) ( 418 bytes ) +1 Steve, that's also the biggest reason for me. --- Joe ( Mon, Aug 01, 2005, 16:29:00 ) ( 733 bytes ) +2 Re: Steve, that's also the biggest reason for me. --- PatD ( Mon, Aug 01, 2005, 17:58:01 ) ( 693 bytes ) Re: Steve, that's also the biggest reason for me. --- jonx ( Tue, Aug 02, 2005, 17:51:48 ) ( 638 bytes ) +4 Bilmey, you are in a cult. Very sad. (no text) --- Joe ( Tue, Aug 02, 2005, 19:58:09 ) ( 0 bytes ) +2 Re: Bilmey, you are in a cult. Very sad. --- Joe ( Tue, Aug 02, 2005, 20:01:58 ) ( 758 bytes ) +1 Re: Bilmey, you are in a cult. Very sad. --- jonx ( Fri, Aug 05, 2005, 07:52:34 ) ( 5150 bytes ) Okay, okay... I'm in a cult!! --- jonx ( Fri, Aug 05, 2005, 07:51:42 ) ( 199 bytes ) img So why read here then? --- Anna ( Wed, Aug 03, 2005, 02:31:59 ) ( 380 bytes ) Re: Steve, that's also the biggest reason for me. --- Jean-Michel ( Wed, Aug 03, 2005, 03:45:54 ) ( 525 bytes ) How bent out of shape Jonx? --- hamzen ( Wed, Aug 03, 2005, 06:12:21 ) ( 936 bytes ) +3 Hi Ham --- Jethro ( Wed, Aug 03, 2005, 08:52:50 ) ( 232 bytes ) An offer for Jonx and current premies --- Danny ( Wed, Aug 03, 2005, 08:57:53 ) ( 1603 bytes ) +2 Re: An offer for Jonx and current premies --- Steve ( Sun, Aug 07, 2005, 07:41:47 ) ( 641 bytes ) Scuze me Mr. Dan but... --- jonx ( Sun, Aug 07, 2005, 10:20:04 ) ( 679 bytes ) img +2 Actually he wouldn't exist without us --- hamzen ( Sun, Aug 07, 2005, 19:50:32 ) ( 343 bytes ) +1 Re: Actually he wouldn't exist without us --- jonx ( Mon, Aug 08, 2005, 12:51:16 ) ( 803 bytes ) +1 There you go with the spiritual assumptions again --- hamzen ( Mon, Aug 08, 2005, 13:44:12 ) ( 891 bytes ) Re: Scuze me Mr. Dan but... --- Danny ( Wed, Aug 10, 2005, 16:28:42 ) ( 424 bytes ) Re: How bent out of shape Jonx? I#ll ask again --- hamzen ( Mon, Aug 08, 2005, 03:30:17 ) ( 53 bytes ) +1 Re: How bent out of shape Jonx? I#ll ask again --- jonx ( Mon, Aug 08, 2005, 12:54:52 ) ( 50 bytes ) +1 Do you usually make comments about people --- hamzen ( Mon, Aug 08, 2005, 13:47:49 ) ( 223 bytes )