- Good grief! (no text) --- Neville B ( Thu, Feb 24, 2005, 13:01:42 ) ( 0 bytes )
- It's quite believable and Jim's request as a repost... --- Cynthia ( Thu, Feb 24, 2005, 13:22:26 ) ( 2725 bytes )
- Do you think the premies "work" Wikipedia in good faith? --- Jim ( Thu, Feb 24, 2005, 13:26:12 ) ( 347 bytes ) +1
- Jim, can we agree? --- Cynthia ( Thu, Feb 24, 2005, 13:31:24 ) ( 221 bytes ) +2
Sure! --- Jim ( Thu, Feb 24, 2005, 13:58:25 ) ( 88 bytes )
- I agree too --- PatD ( Thu, Feb 24, 2005, 15:40:56 ) ( 243 bytes ) +2
- So what do you say? Did Andries resolve anything? --- Jim ( Thu, Feb 24, 2005, 20:32:24 ) ( 3691 bytes ) +2
- Re: So what do you say? Did Andries resolve anything? --- Toby ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 00:53:47 ) ( 1091 bytes ) +1
- Re: So what do you say? Did Andries resolve anything? --- Andries ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 01:13:13 ) ( 821 bytes ) link +3
- Interesting post Andries --- dant ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 03:15:56 ) ( 1786 bytes ) +2
- For rawat "sinister" evidence, read the -trainings- transcripts. (no text) --- bill ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 11:21:37 ) ( 0 bytes )
Andries, Andries, ANDRIES!!!! --- Jim ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 13:27:16 ) ( 3554 bytes ) +1
- wiki principles --- dant ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 04:26:26 ) ( 447 bytes ) +2
- You be the judge . . . --- Billy-Bob ( Thu, Feb 24, 2005, 13:48:31 ) ( 3949 bytes ) +2
- On second reading... --- Cynthia ( Thu, Feb 24, 2005, 15:53:43 ) ( 1719 bytes )
- Disappearing up one's own arsehole. --- AJW ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 05:30:48 ) ( 985 bytes )
- "He never said he was one" (Perfect Master that is) - WHAT????? --- cq ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 12:12:44 ) ( 1530 bytes ) file +2
|
|