On second reading...
Re: Unbelievable premie sophistry from Wikipedia -- Andries Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Cynthia ®

02/24/2005, 15:53:43
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Andries,

"Supporters say that indeed Maharaji expressed his understading that there is only one perfect master, but that he never said he was one. That is up to the student to ascertain. Throughout the years his claim has always been that It is up to each human being to “find the one you can trust to help you get where you want to go and stick with him.” See also Importance of the living teacher."

I just reread this and actually, premies do admit that if a student ascertains, and it's up to them (wink, wink) and okay for them to "ascertain" that Rawat is the perfect master, so be it. So the wiki premies really are admitting that even if a premie believes Rawat is the Perfect Master/Lord/God, that's perfecly okay with him, too, even though it's some warped thinking/writing to get to the same thing as saying it straight out.  It's also an admission that someone needs a certain "one you can trust .." (more winks) All are hidden messages wrapped in hidden meanings.  The "Importance of a living teacher" reference adds meat to the ex-premie argument and is also very good proof that premies agree with ex-premies' position that we were told by Maharaji that he is the Lord/Perfect Master/God, and that we needed him, an avatar, or god-in-a-bod, in order to complete their experience of K, or life itself.   

But, if I got into analyzing everything those people distort over there, well, I'd never had any time for fun and life is much, much too short.  NPOV writing puts me into a coma, especially as written by premies!






Modified by Cynthia at Thu, Feb 24, 2005, 16:09:16

Previous Recommend Current page Next