The flaw with wickpedia is that they are not even shooting for accurate.
Since when does assessment of harm have to depend on motive?We have the accurate story of rawat, in writing in his own publications and on video and tape, and that means nothing to wickpedia.
cultists, who have motives that propel them to use fraud, lies and misrepresentation, are allowed to rult the wick presentation because they say the truth is not the truth,
and they distract wickens by saying you must get lost in wondering what was going on in rawats head !!
I am sure rawat sent money to wick to stifle thier ability to see truth.
THERE is where we can have a discussion of motive !!
WHAT possible motive can be at the root of the wick behaviour?
Some sort of greater smartness? Not a chance.
The issue is not rawats motive.
The issue is the facts about what rawat has said.
And what he has done.
Why cultists are allowed to screw with the facts is the only foggy area that exists.
I say it is the fog resulting from bribery.
OK..............to non judgemental to say the word --bribery--?
Then call it whatever, but wick needs monetary help, and they had to decide wether to leave it on the table, or not.
They choose to accept the money and let --truth-- be debated.
Allow --motive-- to play fogmaker to hide thier decision
