I agree too
Re: Jim, can we agree? -- Cynthia	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: PatD ® 02/24/2005, 15:40:56 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

Andries needs to address these points. I suspect that Andries has chosen to enter this debate because he doesn't trust himself to have a neutral point of view about Sai Baba. It's so much easier to apply those Wiki principles to someone else.

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

So what do you say? Did Andries resolve anything? --- Jim ( Thu, Feb 24, 2005, 20:32:24 ) ( 3691 bytes ) +2 Re: So what do you say? Did Andries resolve anything? --- Toby ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 00:53:47 ) ( 1091 bytes ) +1 nice one toby! (no text) --- dant ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 03:20:12 ) ( 0 bytes ) Re: So what do you say? Did Andries resolve anything? --- Andries ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 01:13:13 ) ( 821 bytes ) link +3 Interesting post Andries --- dant ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 03:15:56 ) ( 1786 bytes ) +2 Dant, a most excellent post , thanks NT (no text) --- Jethro ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 03:27:18 ) ( 0 bytes ) Re: Interesting post Andries --- Yvon F. ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 23:48:34 ) ( 836 bytes ) For rawat "sinister" evidence, read the -trainings- transcripts. (no text) --- bill ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 11:21:37 ) ( 0 bytes ) Andries, Andries, ANDRIES!!!! --- Jim ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 13:27:16 ) ( 3554 bytes ) +1 Andries, the arguement does not rest on "malice" and "sinister... --- bill ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 17:37:47 ) ( 1314 bytes ) wiki principles --- dant ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 04:26:26 ) ( 447 bytes ) +2 Re: wiki principles - Agree Dan... --- Cynthia ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 04:48:03 ) ( 425 bytes ) Re: wiki principles, I started a thread on AAA about Wikipedia (NT) (no text) --- Andries ( Sat, Feb 26, 2005, 14:09:08 ) ( 0 bytes )