- That's evidence of deception? --- cq ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 12:47:12 ) ( 381 bytes ) +1
- I don't get it --- Neville B ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 13:22:36 ) ( 279 bytes ) +1
- "The introduction...didn’t explain anything about Knowledge. ".. --- Joe ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 13:39:55 ) ( 2557 bytes ) +4
- "constipated and lifeless"? No shit, Sherlock. --- cq ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 13:53:02 ) ( 145 bytes ) +1
Okay, Okay, I surrender! --- Cynthia ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 13:53:57 ) ( 1045 bytes ) +2
- The problem is doubly bad, in fact --- Jim ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 17:35:58 ) ( 1842 bytes ) +1
- Re: "The introduction...didn’t explain anything about Knowledge. ".. --- quirky ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 21:24:17 ) ( 394 bytes )
- Re: Wow!!!! Direct evidence that the Rawat cult recruits with deception!... --- another training survivor ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 15:17:28 ) ( 1468 bytes ) +1
- Re: Wow!!!! Direct evidence that the Rawat cult recruits with deception!... --- quirky ( Sat, Feb 26, 2005, 00:07:35 ) ( 172 bytes ) +1
|
|