the forum idea (ot)

the forum idea (ot)
Re: Re: Differences between SSB & DLM/EV -- Andries	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by:
dant ^Ž

02/23/2005, 07:00:35
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators

Hi Andries,

I wanted to respond to Cynthia's suggestion from the post below to you about starting a Sai Baba forum. The thread below was making me seasick so I am bringing the discussion here.

I think this is a fantastic idea. I know you are, for whatever reasons that are incomprehensible to me, dedicated to this Wiki stuff, but I agree so much with Cynthia that you would be doing so much more for yourself and other SB ex-followers if you started a Sai Baba forum. I also would think it fun if the two forums had a loose association and exchange with one another. What do others think about this?

Here is the excerpt from Cynthia's post where she brings this up:

One more thing. Don't you think it would be more beneficial if you started a forum for ex-sai-baba folks? I was looking at your websites this morning and there seem to be plenty of former members -- enough at least to form your own discussion group. It seems to me, like with this forum, that it would much more more beneficial for you and those people to talk amongst yourselves about your particular cult issues, and etc.

Modified by dant at Wed, Feb 23, 2005, 07:51:08

Recommend Current page

Replies to this message

Re: the forum idea (ot) --- Cynthia ( Wed, Feb 23, 2005, 08:33:47 ) ( 419 bytes )
i wouldn't wanna loose andries' presence here.... --- Toby ( Wed, Feb 23, 2005, 12:50:32 ) ( 320 bytes ) +1

seconded. Don't let the xenophobes boot him out! (no text) --- cq ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 12:41:03 ) ( 0 bytes )

Re: (OT) I founded an Ex-guru forum on yahoo --- Andries ( Thu, Feb 24, 2005, 10:19:13 ) ( 61 bytes ) link +1

(Way Off Topic) Geesh --- Jonathan ( Thu, Feb 24, 2005, 11:14:18 ) ( 757 bytes ) +1

Re: I am not anti-semitic and have corrected my earlier post --- Andries ( Thu, Feb 24, 2005, 11:29:03 ) ( 1337 bytes ) +1

And while we're at it, you better clear this up too, if you can, Andries --- Jim ( Thu, Feb 24, 2005, 11:47:39 ) ( 1996 bytes ) +1

Re: I did not give the same weight to the two opposing perspectives --- Andries ( Thu, Feb 24, 2005, 14:51:03 ) ( 1122 bytes ) +1

You're inconsistent and confusing about this, Andries --- Jim ( Thu, Feb 24, 2005, 15:52:36 ) ( 866 bytes ) +1

Re: You're inconsistent and confusing about this, Andries --- Andries ( Thu, Feb 24, 2005, 16:03:27 ) ( 162 bytes ) +1

So what are you implying then? Is this how you talk in the real world?! --- Jim ( Thu, Feb 24, 2005, 16:19:24 ) ( 1336 bytes ) +1

Re: I want to keep an open mind until more evidence becomes available --- Andries ( Thu, Feb 24, 2005, 16:22:00 ) ( 106 bytes ) +1

So what you're REALLY saying is that maybe we ARE that bad! --- Jim ( Thu, Feb 24, 2005, 16:32:40 ) ( 787 bytes ) +1

Re: Evidence --- Andries ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 01:07:09 ) ( 83 bytes ) +3

Definition of Harrassment --- JHB ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 02:31:38 ) ( 609 bytes ) +1

Re: Definition of Harrassment, John I believe you --- Andries ( Mon, Feb 28, 2005, 17:39:35 ) ( 202 bytes ) +1

Re: Definition of Harrassment, John I believe you --- Jethro ( Tue, Mar 01, 2005, 01:21:03 ) ( 845 bytes )

Re: Evidence --- Cynthia ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 04:42:51 ) ( 3130 bytes )
Then what, Andries? --- Jim ( Fri, Feb 25, 2005, 12:59:34 ) ( 70 bytes )