Andries,

You started off sounding like you were considering the two perspectives on roughly equal terms.  Now you've given reasons for rejecting the one that criticizes ex-premies as an apostate hate-group interferring with someone's freedom of religion.  You say you never intended to put the same weight on it as the other. 

So how much weight do you put on it?  Any?  And if not, why would you have posted as you did in the first place?  Don't forget, this was all in the context of your criticizing "black and white thinking".  In other words, you offered the two perspectives to show that the trtuh lay somewhere in the middle supposedly.  But when asked to show much truth there is in the anti-ex perspective you're not willing to say any.  Or are you?