Re: Description of the techniques are missing
Re: Description of the techniques are missing -- JHB	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: toby ® 10/09/2004, 12:46:57 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

they were once included in the main article but taken out with comment "these are sacred to us". although wiki is supposed to be an encyclopedia, there were no objections from the wikipedians, especially gary,zappaz, senegal. what does that mean? think about it. toby

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Re: Description of the techniques are missing --- Andries ( Sat, Oct 09, 2004, 14:23:54 ) ( 217 bytes ) +2 Re: Description of the techniques are missing --- toby ( Sat, Oct 09, 2004, 14:31:07 ) ( 236 bytes ) The fact it's a cult is what's missing!... --- Cynthia ( Sun, Oct 10, 2004, 10:40:57 ) ( 3472 bytes ) +4 Excellent Post! (no text) --- Dr.wow ( Sun, Oct 10, 2004, 12:22:35 ) ( 0 bytes ) Let's have a Knowledge Review ! --- Lexy ( Sun, Oct 10, 2004, 17:25:31 ) ( 793 bytes ) +2 Re: Let's have a Knowledge Review ! --- cq ( Sun, Oct 10, 2004, 18:15:41 ) ( 587 bytes ) link img +1 Here are the modern techniques --- JHB ( Sun, Oct 10, 2004, 22:58:41 ) ( 388 bytes ) link Let's have a Knowledge Review... --- Hilltop ( Sun, Oct 10, 2004, 23:53:11 ) ( 235 bytes ) file img The only Nigel post I could find is about meat ~ sorry --- Hilltop ( Sun, Oct 10, 2004, 23:20:42 ) ( 75 bytes ) file +1 Happy Halloween BTW... A Scary Picture of Santa Claws! --- Hilltop ( Sun, Oct 10, 2004, 23:24:43 ) ( 0 bytes ) file img Larkin's website is down. But I found this spoof on Hiawatha - a classic! --- cq ( Mon, Oct 11, 2004, 15:02:00 ) ( 2945 bytes ) +1 Shri Hans Ji (on Shri Hans’ gee-gee) ! --- Lexy ( Mon, Oct 11, 2004, 18:44:21 ) ( 963 bytes )