|
|
|
|||
|
| Re: Then you are omitting something very important |  | ||
| Re: Then you are omitting something very important -- aunt bea | Top of thread | Post Reply | Forum |
|
AB - The statement of Miller and recording of Prem Rawat are contradictory. T - John Miller doesn't know what happens when he's not there. He can only refer to his own experience. AB - Prem Rawat admits that what he did to Hans was wrong and knows it was wrong now, but he claims he didn't realise it at the time because it was what his family had done. T - Prem Rawat didn't admit that what he did with Hans was wrong. He said touching a little boy's penis was " in our, in our whatever India was, it was very common. It was not a taboo thing." And we know that it was common and affectionate in many cultures. Rawat believes that what he did wasn't wrong and he still doesn't believe it was wrong. T - Rawat's answer to the second half of Hans' question "did you not know that touching (my) genitals would have a negative impact, a life-changing impact on me?" Of course he didn't. In Rawat's culture it's a gesture of affection. The prevalence of little Indian boys of a certain culture remembering it as "sexual abuse" is unknown. What Rawat is referring to is Hans. He is realising that Hans is having "a negative impact, a life-changing" response to what Rawat thought was a gesture of affection. So he agrees with Hans, he realises that it is possible "Now I realise that that’s true, now I do, I do, I do." Hans is have "a negative impact, a life-changing" response. AB - That is completely contradictory to Miller's claim that nothing happened beyond a medical treatment. T - Once again we can discount anything John Miller didn't see. AB - Beyond that, Miller's statement is just absurd. How can he possibly know what happened in the Rawat house at all times and in every room, even in the intimacy of the family private space? T - Obviously he couldn't. AB - So I asked you a question earlier which you didn't answer. Now I will ask you again. Rawat was living in Miami, with an American wife and surrounded by Westerners, where what he did to his son Hans would not only be considered wrong, it would be considered a crime. Do you think what Prem Rawat did to Hans is okay in that context? T - We agree that Rawat touched his son's penis. All fathers and mothers touch their son's penises. In Rawat's culture it's a gesture of affection. So yes it's OK. |
| Previous | Current page | Next |
| Replies to this message |
|
