Thinker - there’s an aspect to your posts which I think is worth noting.
Prem’s personal life has been quite strongly protected by legal restrictions – PDAs etc, which have very effectively limited what those who worked closely with Prem can say. The usual terms of such personally focused PDAs is that they invariably give protection not just to the principle but also to the principle’s family and close associates, notably children are often given especial protection.
Despite this you seem happy to repeat claims by a member of Prem’s personal staff regarding a child’s medical condition, to make a claim regarding the current interactions of Prem’s family, to make a claim about one person’s extreme attitude to his parents and siblings, and to make claims about the denial by one family member regarding statements of another, all of which can only come from protected sources, unless of course you are being economical with the verisimilitude.
So do you have access to usually protected sources in the Rawat family ? Have you been told that Hans Rawat no longer enjoys the protection provided by PDAs applied to the Rawat family ? If so, has it been explained to you the legal basis for Hans being ‘cut loose’ in this way ? Have you been given permission to quote members of the Rawat family ? Are those quotes limited to derogation of one family member for purposes of protecting the selfish interests of one or more other family members or individuals involved in Prem’s businesses or non profits ? Or is it you are drawing quotes from the atmosphere ?
