Mr. or Ms. Thinking really cares about things that might mitigate the culpability of Prem Rawat. For example they couldn't stop talking about the cultural practices of Telugu-speaking Indians they had found on some web page, which it turns out is totally irrelevant.
But what close associates had to say about Rawat, that is somehow not important to them. And that Prem's wife abused their children under his nose, yeah why should that possibly matter?
Obviously a dyed in the wool follower, but what I don't understand is why they post here. Are they thinking they are going to convince someone with that pretzel logic? Or is this some way of pushing back on their own doubts? Or is this simply someone like Charles Glasser doing service?
I suppose we will never know. But I found out something interesting recently. There was an Australian premie, who I am guessing is an ex-premie now, who used to post on the forum to defend Rawat back in those early raucous days. He explained to me that their avatars were in reality run by a team of premies. They had – for that time – sophisticated software that controlled who posted and also masked the original authors. There were indeed several teams doing this at the time. Maybe Thinking is also a team effort? I don't think so though.
However these kind of efforts typically backfire on them. It just reveals the cult nature of Prem and his followers.
