You sound like a Hitler apologist

You sound like a Hitler apologist
Re: Better a clown than a loud-mouth who preaches intolerance! -- jonx	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by:
Jim ^Ž

07/29/2005, 10:00:59
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators

Jonx,

Even if, for argument's sake, some crazy person at some time misconstrued Rawat's meaning, it doesn't mean he didn't have one. Any reasonable person reading Rawat's many, many lectures about surrender would have no difficulty understanding exactly what he meant. Your problem is that he said it. Sorry, fella, there's nothing we can do about that. If you can't handle it, get a new guru!

Recommend Current page

Replies to this message

What a ridiculous claim! --- jonx ( Fri, Jul 29, 2005, 10:57:21 ) ( 1823 bytes ) +5

Mate --- Marshall ( Fri, Jul 29, 2005, 11:40:06 ) ( 173 bytes )
sweet dreams --- dant ( Fri, Jul 29, 2005, 14:35:07 ) ( 1637 bytes ) +1

Re: sweet dreams --- jonx ( Fri, Jul 29, 2005, 14:47:47 ) ( 92 bytes ) +1

um, excuse me? --- dant ( Fri, Jul 29, 2005, 15:24:17 ) ( 1350 bytes ) +1

No, excuse me! --- jonx ( Sat, Jul 30, 2005, 01:22:32 ) ( 125 bytes ) +1

Re: No, excuse me! --- dant ( Sat, Jul 30, 2005, 01:37:42 ) ( 225 bytes ) +1

Re: No, excuse me! --- jonx ( Sat, Jul 30, 2005, 01:54:17 ) ( 538 bytes ) +1

integrity --- dant ( Sat, Jul 30, 2005, 05:11:30 ) ( 897 bytes ) +3

Now what could surrender mean --- Jethro ( Sat, Jul 30, 2005, 05:44:13 ) ( 465 bytes )
Re: integrity --- jonx ( Sat, Jul 30, 2005, 09:14:23 ) ( 1586 bytes ) +2

dant being very serious now --- dant ( Sat, Jul 30, 2005, 11:55:17 ) ( 2712 bytes )
Checkmate again, Jonx! LOL!!!!!!!!! (I love it!) --- Jim ( Sat, Jul 30, 2005, 16:00:47 ) ( 787 bytes ) +1

What a perfectly lame argument! --- jonx ( Sun, Jul 31, 2005, 05:28:48 ) ( 441 bytes ) img +1

So what if you were an instructor? You lose, MATIE! --- Jim ( Sun, Jul 31, 2005, 10:57:58 ) ( 448 bytes ) +1

Re: So what if you were an instructor? You lose, MATIE! --- jonx ( Mon, Aug 01, 2005, 01:07:52 ) ( 1040 bytes ) img

pointless --- Toby ( Sat, Jul 30, 2005, 09:53:22 ) ( 545 bytes ) +1

Re: pointless --- jonx ( Sat, Jul 30, 2005, 11:11:45 ) ( 362 bytes )

OK, Jonx, mate, why don't YOU tell us what "surrender" meant? --- Jim ( Fri, Jul 29, 2005, 15:00:53 ) ( 213 bytes )
Problem solved r.e. the meaning of surrender --- Steve ( Fri, Jul 29, 2005, 19:34:38 ) ( 5968 bytes ) link
Re: What a ridiculous claim! --- Hilltop ( Sat, Jul 30, 2005, 00:48:54 ) ( 123 bytes ) file img +1

Re: What a ridiculous claim! --- Hilltop ( Sat, Jul 30, 2005, 01:12:21 ) ( 344 bytes ) file img +1

Re: What a ridiculous claim! --- Hilltop ( Sat, Jul 30, 2005, 01:29:02 ) ( 112 bytes ) file img