Do all your friends have no integrity like me? Jonx, I explained what I thought surrender meant. You in turn are not willing to talk about your own so that we might actually have a meaningful discussion about what Maharaji might have meant. Instead you insult me. How about offering some other alternatives to my definition, which you claim were rampant, even if they aren't your own. Otherwise your rather nasty insult has no substance, and is simply that, a nasty insult to hide behind because you can't or won't talk about the issue. Anyone who doesn't agree with you has no integrity or is ignorant without you offering one shred of evidence for your claim.And while your at it, I return to my previous assertion and this time do request that you answer it. If people were as confused about what Maharaji meant about surrender as you claim, what does that say about his ability as a teacher?
