dant: Why do you need to support your experience of knowledge using pseudo-science?
POV: I don't. Science supports my experience of Knowledge. After all, Knowledge is an experience for me, whereas science is just a theory.

dant: You are bound to lose in that kind of argument, unless you can find a way to measure a "whole body full of light" for example. The light you "see" in knowledge is an emotional/neurological condition. It isn't photons filling your body.
POV: There is only one "light".

dant: As I said in my prevous post which you didn't respond to, according to your quoted 1st law of thermodynamics, energy is finite.
POV: POV: I'll repeat it for you. Please try to get it right this time.The 1st Law of Thermodynamics says energy cannot be created, or destroyed, only modified in form, ie it is eternal.

dant: If energy was infinite, the universe couldn't exist, at least not according to any known science.
POV: Well, at least not according to your knowledge of science.