I'm glad to see you're both kicking.  Nigel, I'm assuming from your comment that the study isn't valid, or that the results don't mean what the researchers are claiming.  Anyway, thanks for responding, and if you do get around to beheading this thing, double-thanks.

For anyone interested who didn't see the original post, the link is  http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/Allen_Press/2RMCi0892-3310-002-02-0155.pdf