a question for POV
Re: the logic of POV -- billy Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
dant ®

10/14/2004, 07:32:15
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




As Bill points out, your whole belief that Rawat could not have known about Jagdeo earlier is based on the notion that Rawat had "disciplined" other Mahatmas guilty of sexual transgressions. I'd like to leave the topic of Jagdeo for a moment and ask you something else. Amongst those Mahatmas that Rawat sent back to India were also rapists. Do you think that the appropriate way to deal with rapists is to send them back to India? Is that your idea of dealing with the problem?

Rawat dealt the same way with Fakiranand and Rick Fletcher after they tried to kill Pat Haley. One of the people whom you recently quoted as a source, Mike Donner, gave witness to the fact that Rawat asked him to get Fakiranand out of the country. Is this the appropriate way to deal with would-be murderers?

Rick Fletcher was still living years later in the New York ashram. He didn't have to work like the rest of us. He had the cushy job of house mom. He was also on the aspirant team then. He wasn't even thrown out of the ashram! Is this the appropriate way to deal with would-be murderers?






Modified by dant at Thu, Oct 14, 2004, 07:33:56

Previous Recommend Current page Next

Replies to this message