Prem Rawat on his critics...
  Archive
Posted by:
Cynthia ®

04/08/2006, 08:04:17
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




Over on Wikipedia someone asked for quotes of Rawat responding to critics.  I don't want to get into the subject of Wiki (because I'm kind of burnt out on it).  I was struck by these:

As for your request for a quote of Maharaji in which he addresses critics, etc., here you have one for each one of the past four decades.

  • July 14, 1973 London, United Kingdom: I know people have written different things about me, “Oh, he has done this and he has done that.” This criticism has been going on for a long, long, long time. But never has anyone criticized what I have really been giving to people. No one.

Hmmm.  No one?  That's definitive.  And, he's wrong.

  • May 18, 1983 Mexico City, Mexico: "You know, I haven’t yet left anybody. But a lot of people have tended to leave me. And come back, sometimes. Sometimes they don’t.

So what?  It's a meaningless statement with a tinge of self-pity and aloofness.  What is his point?

  • April 6, 1991 Kaohsiung, Taiwan: I do not know of a single person who has come to Knowledge where Knowledge has not had a profound impact on their life. Maybe now they say, “Oh, no. It wasn’t this way.” But at that time, Knowledge was having a profound impact on their lives.

Clear proof Rawat lives in his own little world (in his head) and hasn't got a clue about other people.  Just weird and ambiguous.

  • November 19, 2001 Philadelphia, PA, USA
[Question from audience]: I discovered a site on the internet with people who are, quote, ex-premies, who were supposedly close to you, Maharaji.
[Maharaji]: They may garner hatred towards me, I do not garner hatred towards them. I have no reason to. If they extended ...(and it’s not “they,” it would have to be individuals), their hand of friendship, of that feeling, and if it was real, it would be accepted today by me as it was the first day they met me. Why? Why? Not because I’m looking for friendship, but from where I sit, I’m comfortable enough to do that. I’m secure. I don’t have to badmouth anybody. As simple as that.

This is the most telling one of all.  He automatically assumes that anyone that's critical of him, automatically hates him.  The word and label of hate has great significance in the world of Maharaji now, and I'd guess it has been nourtured for a long time.  I suspect it a large part of the aspirant programming too. "Them?  Oh, they're a hate group."  What's so telling is that Rawat says he doesn't hate or need to badmouth anyone, but what's gone on in the past years in attempt to shut ex-premies up (it's a long list) is the direct opposite of what he says in this statement.  Plus, I just don't believe he doesn't bad-mouth exes.  He see exes as those who only hate him and can't seem to understand that he has ever made a mistake and deserves criticism. Interesting. It he's critcized, he's hated, period.

Does that bother me?  You bet it does, especially because my real name is listed with that label that's tough to shed.  I view it as an insidious cult backlash tactic against defectors.  It's the reason I started posting again.  He has no right to label me that way and I won't stand for it.  When I google my name, I'm listed.  So much for Rawat not badmouthing anyone!

Does anyone remember other quotes (place/dates would help) when M spoke about defectors, critics?






Modified by Cynthia at Sat, Apr 08, 2006, 08:20:29

Previous Recommend Current page Next

Replies to this message

Cythia: here is a copy of a post I put up in 2001
Re: Prem Rawat on his critics... -- Cynthia Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Jethro ®

04/08/2006, 09:05:08
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




"In the late 80s prempal did an instructor training course in Penang. One of the particpants there told me that he had some disagreement with someone and made allthe candidates stand uo in a group and videod them saying 'fuck you'.

I was told this by Lee Marges, an Australian pwk, who I know to be completely honest.(I doubt that she talks to me now).
Oh yes, Lee herself refused to participate.

Anyway, I just wondered if you knew anything about this.

Jethro

PS apologies to all who have seen this before, I put this info up some time ago.

PPS to any Ozs reading this. If you see Lee or Sam Bender(her husband) please tell them to email me on the above email and not be angry with me. I see no reason why what Lee told me should not be made public. Pwk's should know the character of their leader. "

I am sorry to say that Lee and Sam just went silent. David Roupell also said he was at the f-u video.

Everyone who has lived around him knows how nasty he is.





Related link: http://www.ex-premie.org/best/bof02032001160005.htm#P_174K
Modified by Jethro at Sat, Apr 08, 2006, 09:06:00

Previous Recommend Current page Next
yup!
Re: Cythia: here is a copy of a post I put up in 2001 -- Jethro Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
LP ®

04/08/2006, 09:14:29
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin





I've browsed the "conference" transcripts a few time on EPO, not all of them, but cannot make sense out of it. Some parts sound distinctly wierd, not to say: indecent. One consistent pattern seemed to be that every time someone dared comment it was viewed as criticism and they were subjected to ridicule and sometimes profane abuse.  The entire "conference" seemed to be an extended tirade... with a pledge ending..





Modified by LP at Sat, Apr 08, 2006, 11:35:09

Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: Cythia: here is a copy of a post I put up in 2001
Re: Cythia: here is a copy of a post I put up in 2001 -- Jethro Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Cynthia ®

04/08/2006, 12:55:55
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




Thanks, Jethro, I remember it.  Read through those old posts too.  Virgil was another guy that scared the crap out of me.  But, that was just me and men in authority at the time. 

Yeah, I hope any premies reading this forum realize that when they say ex-premies are a hate-group that they are pepetuating one of Maharaji's urban legends, a myth.  It doesn't bother me in a contant nagging way, but premies must know that if they experience any joy, glee, or triumph at labeling us as such and reading my posts today, they really need to search their consciences.






Modified by Cynthia at Sat, Apr 08, 2006, 12:58:11

Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: Cythia: here is a copy of a post I put up in 2001
Re: Cythia: here is a copy of a post I put up in 2001 -- Jethro Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Ocker ®

04/08/2006, 16:59:31
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




Lee Marges refused a direct command of Prem Pal's? Really? Well she passed the course anyway as I recall she was doing speeches in this area as an instructor. I've never heard a bad word said about her.

I wonder if it is possible to understand the extraordinary dead-ends, 180 degree turns, stops and starts of the whole Western mahatma/iniiator/instructor/part-time instructor/DVD operator saga. Talk about a tornado in a tea-cup. As Mahatma Saphlanand was apparently the only Western mahatma and he soon saw the light and left the lotus feet there can't be anyone who has actually lasted the whole course. Is there anybody who has gone the distance from 1974 on? Ira Woods maybe, there was a heavy duty one track mind if I ever saw one.






Previous Recommend Current page Next
The Western Mahatmas
Re: Re: Cythia: here is a copy of a post I put up in 2001 -- Ocker Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Joe ®

04/10/2006, 16:02:20
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




Maharaji ordained 4 (or was it five?) Americans as "Mahatmas" in 1975 and as far as I can tell, only Ira Woods is still in the cult.

Bill Patterson (Mahatma Satchitanand), left the cult in the 80s or early 90s, and then was in some kind of serious accident and I have heard he is very disabled.  I was living in the ashram with Bill Patterson when he got christined, and I remember we got him a set of cowboy clothes, complete with boots and a Stetson, so he would be a true "Western Mahatma."  Bill was a true fanatic, but I liked him, he was a nice guy, just annoyingly positive.  If I were to pick someone who I would judge as THE LAST person to leave the Rawat cult, it would have been Bill Patterson, but leave he did.

Arthur Brigham (Mahatma Gurupujanand (or was that Ira?)) also left the cult, and I heard he was living in Southeast Asia.  Maybe his name was Mahatma Hans Jayanti or something.

Kathy Sullivan (Pranam Bai), was Rawat's head housekeeper in Malibu, and I heard she left the cult and runs a mobile library truck for the LA Public Library and has a website on which she recommends books.

Ira Woods (Mahatma Gurupujanand (or maybe that was Arthur)), is apparently still a card-carrying devotee, last I heard.

Around 1977, Rawat started ordaining Westerners and changed the name from "Mahatma" to "Initiator."






Modified by Joe at Mon, Apr 10, 2006, 16:03:40

Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: Arthur Brigham
Re: The Western Mahatmas -- Joe Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Ocker ®

04/10/2006, 16:31:20
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




I'm pretty sure Arthur Brigham went to gaol here in Australia for a while for drug smuggling or selling offenses. He had moved to the Cairns district in North Qld and was involved in the hosptitality trade but it wasn't profitable enough for him. This would have been the early 1980's.

I remember he rang and had the gall to try to "super-premie" me into giving his girl-friend front row seats at a program with Maharaji. "Arthur who?" "I'm sorry who are you?"






Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: Arthur Brigham
Re: Re: Arthur Brigham -- Ocker Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Joe ®

04/10/2006, 16:51:26
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




Yes, I had heard he got in trouble with drugs, but it was second hand information so I didn't want to mention it.

Arthur was a true pompous ass.  That's it:  Mahatma Pompousassanand.  Now I remember.

Ira was also a fanatic.  I always thought he had the look of Tony Perkins in Psycho.  I think he was a cab driver in NYC before he became a professional premie.






Modified by Joe at Mon, Apr 10, 2006, 16:52:13

Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: Arthur Brigham
Re: Re: Arthur Brigham -- Joe Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
LP ®

04/10/2006, 16:54:45
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




 Seems ... I remember him playing the sitar....  or has my memory begun to get carried away .....?






Previous Recommend Current page Next
Yes, he was in the "Holy Jesters" with Charanand and Rich Neal.
Re: Re: Arthur Brigham -- LP Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Joe ®

04/10/2006, 17:16:40
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin










Previous Recommend Current page Next
nice line up
Re: Yes, he was in the "Holy Jesters" with Charanand and Rich Neal. -- Joe Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
LP ®

04/10/2006, 17:27:30
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin










Modified by LP at Mon, Apr 10, 2006, 17:50:44

Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: Ira Woods was a NY cab driver
Re: Re: Arthur Brigham -- Joe Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Ocker ®

04/10/2006, 19:02:24
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




When he was in Australia he often mentioned beng a NY cab driver. Actually he had some pretty funny  lines which he delivered in a monotone deadpan. ACtually, everything he said was in a monotone deadpan. I've got some tapes of his satsangs I'm going to digitise and have a listen to if they don't self destruct on opening.






Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: The Western Mahatmas
Re: The Western Mahatmas -- Joe Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
LP ®

04/11/2006, 03:35:48
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin





Any one remember hearing of Kathy's daring escape from the res. at Trancas, when she ran down the south west side with fire threatening to engulf her from either direction, when fiery Santa Anna winds blew over taking out his motor home, model 'T' ford etc... etc.... and every cactus in the canyon!





Modified by LP at Tue, Apr 11, 2006, 05:02:36

Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: OT I am not an online gentleman, what type are you?
Re: Prem Rawat on his critics... -- Cynthia Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Andries ®

04/08/2006, 10:12:06
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




Cynthia,

You wrote at Wikipedia that I am an online gentleman. Even I think  that this is untrue, at least in Wikipedia. I guess I am more of a combination between a tireless rebutter, a duelist, and a eagle scout

What type are you?

Andries






Modified by Andries at Sat, Apr 08, 2006, 10:12:24

Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: OT I am not an online gentleman, what type are you?
Re: Re: OT I am not an online gentleman, what type are you? -- Andries Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Cynthia ®

04/08/2006, 10:32:14
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




I don't dare say, Andries, because I've been called the worst.

That website is funny.

Hope you're well (aside from being a tireless, dueling scout). 






Modified by Cynthia at Sat, Apr 08, 2006, 10:32:39

Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: Jim is the atheist
Re: Re: OT I am not an online gentleman, what type are you? -- Cynthia Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Andries ®

04/09/2006, 07:10:17
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




(Jim, I hope you do not mind, but this was just too funny not to post. Andries)

Atheist is Deacon's cyber-doppelganger. Deacon and Atheist hold equally fervent, though diametrically opposed beliefs about religion, and both feel compelled to share those beliefs at every possible opportunity. Should an unsuspecting forum member make even a passing comment about faith or spirituality of any flavor, Atheist will descend like one of the Furies, mercilessly hectoring all of the ignorant and delusional believers about the sordid history of the church and the pernicious effects of religion on society. After a few of Atheist’s anti-religious jeremiads most other Warriors will avoid the subject altogether, though Evil Clown may egg him on a little, and Philosopher may amuse himself by pointing out flaws in his reasoning. If a forum has the misfortune of having both Deacon and Atheist as members, the bickering often continues until Nanny or Admin pulls the plug. Bliss Ninny can also sometimes squelch the conversation by saying, “Well, everyone has a right to their [sic] opinion.”





Related link: Mike Reed charicatures "The Atheist"

Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: Prem Rawat on his critics...
Re: Prem Rawat on his critics... -- Cynthia Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Premie_Spouse ®

04/09/2006, 16:35:35
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




The "seat", if you will, of premie paranoia, obviously comes from the top down.  Why don't they just get over it?  If they indeed have the "Knowledge of all knowledges", what the hell else matters? 






Previous Recommend Current page Next