Here's an idea: for everybody here, for Rennie Davis
  Archive
Posted by:
Mick ®

02/20/2006, 08:54:27
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




To Everybody:

Ok, now that people have gotten some things out of their system, and justifiably vented a bit regarding Rennie and his letter, here's an idea at least worth trying:

Remember that with Donner, Dettmers, and some others (including even non-premie Halley), people collectively brainstormed and compiled some polite questions for each of them. And then, in that scenario and spirit, nobody jumped all over their cases. They all got a fair shake from the ex-premie forum.

After awhile, the old former culties we knew felt a lot more comfortable communicating -- and even posting, and/or emailing back and forth.

Everybody involved in the process learned a bunch from the experience. The same approach could be tried again. At the least, nothing gained, nothing lost.

If Rennie would just get off his high horse, stop pontificating, and stick to some honest two-way discussions on an equal basis and level of mutual respect, then I think there's the possibility of something good coming out of all this.

First, Rennie still believes some of this stuff he was indoctrinated with in the cult and from the whole New Age smorgasbord. There's some understanding and experience that we've all gained from discussing these topics in-depth, reading posts and submitted articles, links, journeys, etc. For instance, I read hundreds of pages of ex-premie testamonials at www.ex-premie.org and the first forum[s] when I truly exited (and I mean Really finally exited from the throes of the Rawat clan gurujism, and its attendant mountain of layers upon layers of bogus conditioned, enslaving concepts), along with reviewing all the docs and other evidence submitted, plus the David Lane writings, and a whole lot of other info out there at other ex-devotee sites of various guru charlatans, as well as studying about co-dependent relationships, reading dozens of related books, and so forth.

It takes some time and a conscious effort to rid oneself of the garbage that was reinforced over and over and over again daily in Rawat's cult, especially for people who were around in Rawat's early years in the West. The more involved a person was in the cult, the more layers to peel away.

For instance, Rennie still thinks it was Prem, and not his own receptivity and state of mind, that accounted for him experiencing inner light, etc.. Some of us have experienced that light all our lives, for whatever that's worth. Yet, we still fell for the necessity of the guru 'pitch,' because it somehow explained our experience, when we heard of the 'divine light', etc. And then, a whole pile of guru junk got immediately ladled on top of that.

As we've observed, Rennie also has this disconnect as far as holding Prem accountable for the Lord of the Universe bs, etc. I still have tapes and videos of all that stuff - from the 1970s all the way to the end of the last century. The person most responsible for pushing the devotion to him, and all the bogus concepts and claims that tied people to him as devotees - was Prem Rawat (Guru Maharaj Ji) himself. The mahatmas (instructors) were just following his agya (direction), and from there so was everybody else. No amount of spin-doctoring by the Rawat cult p.r. apparatus can change that, or obscure the Truth. Rawat played it for all he could, milking the premies for hundreds of millions of dollars - just like the Maharishi, Sai Baba, Ching Hai, Muktananda, Rajneesh, and the rest of the spiritual Eastern frauds who came to the West, ready to convert the naive Westerners to their master-slave cult cash-cow dominions.

What Rennie doesn't realize is that anybody - and I mean anybody - can teach those techniques, and many people have taught the same techs, with people reporting the same effects we're more than familiar with. It didn't matter who showed people the techs. The only connection to any experience was within each person, for whatever that relative experience meant to them. I even showed some people, too, and they had similar experiences. Guess what? Then, those people started looking to me. And I said, "No, no, no!"

And it would be the easiest thing to succumb to the ego and desires, in that position. Imagine - you could set yourself up as a guru, just like the various Rawats did (and lots of other scammers have done, too). Reinvent the history a bit, concoct a little different approach, introduce the guru concept by talking in riddles and allude to yourself in the 3rd person when speaking of God, Guru, the Master, etc. That works incredibly well in India, where you've got about a billion illiterate superstitious poor people who believe in and worship a tradition of elephant and monkey deities (Ganesh and Hanuman), Gods with 6-8 arms, etc and a huge pile of mythological concepts. You can easily con such people into thinking there's this magical transference of energy, opening up their third eye, etc., and they'll believe it. Then, they'll do anything for you. Anything. We know it, all too well. If an unscrupulous person, say a householder and not a genuine renunciant, set himself/herself up as a guru -- the easy and most powerful ego temptation would be to control and manipulate the devotees. For what? Power, wealth, sex, you name it. And then that addiction becomes all-consuming. And a person like that will say and do anything to keep that power, because these false gurus and self-styled spiritual yogis, masters are themselves the slaves of their desires.

This reinforced conditioning has been perfected for many generations in N. India and elsewhere in Asia. Ex-premies and ex-devotees of all types of such cults know the spiels, the games these charlatans use, and the learned helplessness and superstitions that become ingrained in the guileless, surrendered devotee. Kind of like what happens to POWs after extensive brain-washing.

It therefore takes a conscious deprogramming process to undo the psychological/emotional/mental personal damage done by greedy gurus and their cults. For instance, as much as some people out there might think Jim is like a pit bull with some premies on the forums, or with people who will believe just about any thing supernatural (or accept anything from a tradition they don't understand) - it sometimes is necessary to be intellectually confrontational with some people, even rude or mocking, in order to bring out the best of a person's long-suppressed reasoning skills, their independence, and to assist them in getting used to honing their rational intelligent brain and mental skills again. In the Rawat cult, all the members were taught NOT to use their brains. The 'mind' was the enemy. Never leave room for doubt.

Thus, using your intelligence was being "in your mind." People were taught zombie group-think, not to think for yourself. Whatever didn't jive with Rawat or the cult - was the devotee's fault, never the guru's. Always.

I've researched a bunch of other guru cults, and it's the same sick games, the same sick superstitions, the same role-playing, the same subservience, the same types of cult brain-washing. People just giving up the reigns of their lives to these manipulative dictators posing as spiritual people. The guru is the parasite, but pretends to be the giver of the gift, constantly reinforcing the message again and again, at every opportunity. If the guru was Not a parasite, then the guru would give the so-called gift with NO strings of devotion, or of any kind, whatsoever - monetary, or otherwise - attached. If such a thing as a true guru existed, then that guru would Never accept anything tangible in return from the student. After all, that's even what Kabir himself said. That's the quickest way to tell a fraud.

The young pampered Napoleon Prem Rawat pretended he didn't want anything monetary in return, just devotion and some service. (He still does pretend this, and the vocabulary and external trappings and modus operandi have been modified with time to conceal the fact that it's just the same old game, at the core of the conditioning.) This Knowledge was supposed to be "Free," right? Yeah, if it's Free, then why does he nowadays even go to the point of making aspirants literally sign legal documents before getting the techniques? It's all about power and control. That's the whole shebang. That's how he got filthy and obscenely rich, off the slave labor and donations/gifts of thousands of his devotees, and that's how his family got every single material thing they have in this entire world. Sure, the finances and diverted non-profit org funds are covered in layers upon layers of shell corporations and fake non-profits and foreign bank accounts now, and so forth, but we know the scam inside and out. We've been around the block by now. We won't be fooled again!

Now, back to Rennie. From reading his letter, it's obvious to us he never made it to the point of recognizing this scam for what it really is. He's still caught up in this la-la land, where he retains a large measure of the inculcated guru and cult bullshit, deep within the neurons of his brain. Maybe he thinks he could teach ex-premies, but in fact - he would be the student. Ex-premies would have to teach him how to uncondition this shit in his head that has entrapped him into predictable ways of thinking - and believing. As he's admitted, he made a "leap of faith," based on seeing some inner light. Ok, we understand that, don't we? And that simple 'leap of faith' directed at Prem and his personality cult entrapped Rennie, just like it's done to tens of thousands of people, at various times.

So, I think if Rennie could just open up to listen here, and really think about it, and reclaim the brain he had before he got sucked into the Rawat trap, he would be all the wiser and better off again. It would at least show him the falsehood and absurdity of some of the stuff he was spouting in that letter. It would change his life, for the better.

Similarly, there are probably some things he eventually felt within and learned from external sources elsewhere, too, that helped him at least have the strength to physically separate himself from the cult, to some extent, years ago. Yet, he is still evidently susceptible, because he never rid himself of some of the underlying concepts and gimmicks foisted on us by the guru. And the guru learned these gimmicks from the age of 2, imitating his dad. That's why he could get up at 8 years old and say and do the things he did, however impressive it might have seemed, at the time.

Hey, I was taught violin before I even went to elementary school. By the time I was 7-8, professional classical musicians were calling me the little Paganini. But, I wasn't, really. I had just been trained from an early age. So, it's not surprising that Rennie still remains impressed with those initial experiences in India, when everything was so new to him, and he was most impressionable. Running into by that time a 15-year old who seemed to know more about spirituality than he did, with some common meditation techniques purloined by the family from yogis that sealed the deal. Hey, we all learned the stories, how to give satsang, by example. Now, imagine if any of us had started being groomed to run that racket from the age of 2! It's obvious now why Prem could say the things he did, and so forth. Once you get the drift and the rap down, it's so easy to expand upon it. After awhile, the guru concept logorrhea comes naturally out of the mouth. Everything and any subject can be turned into seeming 'satsang'. We did it, we know the game. From dung beetle discourse to talking about cars to quantum physics. It's just a learned conditioned behavior. And it has an effect on other people, because most people want to believe in something higher than themselves that explains everything and ties everything together, they want something positive, and they want to think they can find ultimate peace and knowledge. Once a person gets into this repetitive conditioning reinforcing pattern of thinking, talking, and believing in this manner conceptually, and ignoring the warning signs and shutting off their brain an hour or two a day, that's it. They're caught, oh yeah, they're in the trap to the point where if you open the cage door, they'll even go out and bring back goodies at the bidding of the cage keeper. They don't even see the psychological co-dependent prison they're in.

So, We know Rennie has some steps to make on this journey. Only, HE thinks HE Knows. And he's created this magical space in his head where he's developed new fantasies, adding more concepts to the pile. It's like a disease. You gotta get to the roots of that disease, the bottom of that concept pile, and knock it over, expose it for the crap it really is -- because everything else was simply built on top of that foundation of guru conceptual elephant shit.

I see these alternative magazines at the news kiosks and health-food stores all the time. They are so full of this crap - literally shit for the brains, mind-rot. And people fall for it, adding it onto their pile of spiritual baggage and burdensome concepts they carry around with them. You know what I'm talking about: people setting themselves up as Reiki masters, Rolfing, EST, channeling spirits, and on and on and on. It's like a Pandora's Box of peddled wacky spiritual and holistic garbage in these alternative magazines, 99% of it total bullshit. Boulder, Colorado is the capital of this mind-rot plague. All these aging hippies and now next generation hippies, and other people searching for something who are then unwittingly sucked into some of these trips.

For many of us in the West, it started when we were kids, beginning with the Judao-Christian mythologies, supersitions, and dualistic concepts. But most of us had enough experience in our own culture to see through the Bible-thumping charlatans. Yet, we were greenhorn babies, we had no such experience or understanding, initially, of some Eastern concepts - and the Asian religions' version of the Bible-thumping eyeball-pressing snake oil salesmen.

Rennie jumped from inculcated Methodist to political activist into the clutches of an Eastern Jimmy Swaggert /Jim and Tammy Baker/Jim Jones. Only it looked and sounded and seemed different. After all, it was all so quite new. We were the experimenting hippie generation. We didn't trust our own culture or our elders in society, so we gravitated towards the exotic, the esoteric, the Eastern cultures. For many, the mind-altering drug experience legacy was a contributing factor in what attracted people to the so-called Knowledge techniques. In America, it was a pivotal time in many people's lives back then - with the Vietnam War prolonged, the LSD and mescaline, etc., all the turmoil in society, the race riots, the pop music evolving.

Everything seemed to be rolling on this continuum, and people were looking for answers. The greedy charlatan gurus were only too happy to oblige. We naively gave them our personal power, and they took it, and of course abused it for their own selfish ends. In the brainwashing of the cult members, a lot of internal scarring and damage occurred.

So, it's not simply enough just to physically walk away from a cult - as Rennie probably did. No, you have to rid yourself of all this artifical harmful guru and cult thinking, and the related mental behavioral tendencies -- from the inside out, because that's exactly how the damage began and occurred, too. The cult conditioning was to break down the student from the inside, beginning with "a leap of faith," "surrendering" to the guru and inculcating the cult concepts, and then the key - basic techs of individual mind-control, but falsely taught as a means to suppress the very brains and intelligence we were born with, leaving a vacuum to be filled with Eastern cult concepts and guru empowerment student disempowerment concepts. Never leave room for doubt.

Maharaji used to talk about the 'concept-maker', claiming he was like Shiva breaking the concepts. No, that was a lie; he just cleverly persuaded everybody to let down their guards internally, and then once emptied he filled the vessels [us] with HIS learned concepts, assimilated when he was a guru protege (as modeled and taught by his dada), concepts that debilitate the guru's student both mentally and functionally, to the detriment of the individual's natural and innate personal development. In fact, gurujism stunts one's personal growth and awareness.

It's like walking around with a narrow field of vision looking through colored glasses. It is Not empowering for the student, it is enslaving. The enslaved student empowers the guru. Why did all the premies gravitate to and fawn over the mahatmas and cult officials? Because the cult power heirarchy went from the guru through his agents, trickling down to the worker ants. It's only natural. Once premies, their personal power was surrendered and gone, their egos, their independence surrendered to a greedy guru, who naturally abused the situation to the fullest, under false pretenses. The only empowerment was in moving up the cult ladder. So, that explains the attraction of wanting to be an instructor or a coordinator. Or, upon physically leaving the cult, setting oneself up as just another New Age guru-type. It's just a learned behavior. Rennie still carries this baggage around - only, he thinks he's moved beyond. No. In truth, he just piled more similar shit onto that pile. He never rooted out the fundamental problem, at the very bottom of the pile. That's the only way to get rid of it, short of a lobotomy. Starting at the very bottom of that phony conceptual pile of learned behaviors and ways of thinking - from the inside out - dumping that shit right out of your head.

So, having some ex-premies around to provide feedback is the best thing that could possibly happen to Rennie right now in his life. You can't bullshit around ex-premies. We know all those spiritual games. We've heard all the raps from thousands of people, all those premies coming around to preach to us - and then becoming ex-premies themselves, including instructors and the very people Rawat even had monitoring the ex-premie websites and forums. It's funny, really. He's got attorneys after prominent ex-premies, he's got his cult computer hackers, he's got his hired spin doctors, the ever-changing FAQs on his websites, the name changes in the organization, the cult requirements for aspirants to effectively sign away their bonafide legal rights, etc. etc. But, we're onto him, and ex-premies aren't ever going away, NOPE, not as long as there's a Rawrat guru on the face of this earth. For every premie who stays entrapped, 10-20 more leave. It's attrition by numbers, except of course in India, where gurujism, rampant superstitions, and a quasi caste system still reign supreme.

Anyway, my suggestion is this: whoever wants to contribute, why not just come up with some legit questions you'd really like to ask Rennie. Let's give him a chance - not dump any more of our outrage on him - his pile of shit is already way big enough. That's an awful lot of personal work he's going to have to unravel for himself, that is, if he's interested in actually learning something.

I'm done. Rennie's got nothing to fear from me, anyway. The worst I'd do is mirror him back, or make a joke, if he starts ladling out his predictable spiritual amoebic dysentery rap again. That's the only time to really confront him, just like ex-premies have always done, if somebody's conceptual caca really starts to stink. I probably won't even be around when he posts, anyway, and there are other people who'd like to talk with him, get some answers, and in turn maybe help him make sense of it all, too.

I'm feeling old and tired now. Gotta go get some rest here, so I can get some work done.

later...

- Mick


Let's kick this off:

So, why did you leave in the 1970s, Rennie?

What made you go to Maharaji/Prem Rawat program again, after all these years?

Maybe ask him about some inside the cult stuff, whatever...








Previous Recommend Current page Next

Replies to this message

Re: Here's an idea: for everybody here, for Rennie Davis
Re: Here's an idea: for everybody here, for Rennie Davis -- Mick Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Will ®

02/20/2006, 09:20:20
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




Wow, you certainly bring up a lot of points.  It would be interesting to get all of these issues worked out with Rennie, if he were to accept the challenge.

One of the salient points for me is the understanding of the actual damage that is done by gurus and cults.  People in cults believe that they are being helped.  And sometimes, when people leave, they often think that although things didn't pan out, no harm done really.  But I think it is so important to see the negative effects, both of cults and of religion. 

This issue is the one of the most important ones facing the world today.  Although humans will probably not evolve much more physically through mutation and selection, we must evolve psychologically toward a healthier state.  The evolution that Rennie is hoping for is one such proposition, but I think his idea is too phoo-phoo for the actual reality of this world.  It is true that we must create our own reality, but we must do this with our intellect and our hands, we must avoid over-idealizing the world we live in.

So I think that gurus bring their students along a dead-end path that might be fairly innocuous for certain individuals, but the general effect of false doctrines can be truly devastating to our collective well-being.  This is why I think it is important for us to continue to counter Rawat's philosophical teachings.







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Not so sure about that, Mick
Re: Here's an idea: for everybody here, for Rennie Davis -- Mick Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
nigel ®

02/20/2006, 09:56:37
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




That was a very well-written, insightful post, Mick – and I can hardly fault a word of it. Thanks.

However, I couldn’t go along with your Rennie proposition. Aren’t you simply allowing / inviting My Davis to carry on basking in his special status: Celebrity premie becomes celebrity ex? I can just see him holding court here, once he’s certain no one’s going to be nasty to him – lapping up our collective focus like nobody’s business. All ex-premies are important, but none of us are that important.

Even if I didn’t find the idea somewhat distasteful, setting up a special task-force to save Rennie from himself seems –mm - rather evangelical – surely the apotheosis of all it means to be an ex -- that is, no longer involved in any kind of group-think, unless it’s the kind of spontaneous collective action where people simply do it off their own bats – as with posting negative reviews of Rawat’s fake poetry on Amazon etc.

Because, basically, that is what would happen anyway, had Rennie come across as more sincere and less arrogant – turned up in person, even. Us forum funsters would no doubt welcome him, entertain him, question him, make him tea and give him group hugs. But all that means is doing what we do anyway when newcomers appear, provided they don’t imagine they have something to teach us all. Then, for sure, they’ll get themselves a verbal slapping.

Let Rennie show up, as and when, if he ever gets genuinely curious. He knows where to find us. Otherwise forget about him, I say.

Nige

 






Modified by nigel at Mon, Feb 20, 2006, 13:56:17

Previous Recommend Current page Next
I tend to agree with Nige here : )
Re: Not so sure about that, Mick -- nigel Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Dermot ®

02/20/2006, 13:00:31
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin










Previous Recommend Current page Next
We should Rennie to give us a talk, do a workshop
Re: Not so sure about that, Mick -- nigel Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Jim ®

02/20/2006, 13:39:27
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




If there's any chance I can get some of that comfy capitalism going my way, I'm in.

Rennie, don't listen to these other guys.  They're rude loosers.  They were sure rude to you now weren't they?  Personally, I thought you were kind of charming and positive.

Email me!  I think I know people who know your people. 

jimheller@shaw.ca">jimheller@shaw.ca






Modified by Jim at Mon, Feb 20, 2006, 13:39:51

Previous Recommend Current page Next
Contact!
Re: We should Rennie to give us a talk, do a workshop -- Jim Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
nigel ®

02/20/2006, 14:09:55
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




I have found myself in unexpected psychic communication with Premie Davis via a pretty cool bridge of light. He is humbled and privileged to be doing a workshop and helping out here and has channelled me the answers to your questions. He tells me that once you understand what he’s saying, all questions become irrelevant, but he’ll do what he can…

>>>>

To Karenl:

>Just exactly WHEN did you stop believing that rawat was LOTU, and what exactly precipitated that realization? The light was presumably still "within inside" you, still blazing away. Rawat was still giving darshan in private settings, so what changed?

It must have been when I came around to a deeper understanding that taking on a guru is a step along The Way. By ‘killing the guru" metaphorically, we can make our own reality and carry on having that experience, yet still feel gratitude to The One who set us on our respective paths. Darshan is for those who still need it, and nothing to get upset about if you don’t receive it any more. It sounds like you too have moved a little beyond that, Karen. Well done!

To cq:

>Rennie, in February 1974, you were quoted as saying:
"Either Guru Maharaj Ji is for real, or he's the biggest fraud of all time."
My question: how's that fence you're sitting on holding up?

Is that what the magazine reported me as saying? Wow! - I guess they had a negative agenda of some sort. Or, well, maybe let's suppose I did say it - though I'm pretty sure I didn’t – I was probably just explaining that that’s the way the world sees Maharaji in Western, dualistic terms. He’s EITHER this, OR he’s that – so much dumb-ass binary logic. Reality doesn’t work like that, and it can’t be explained in words, as it’s an experience. But if I did say that, well – yeah, sure, I guess I apologise, if any of you guys found it confusing but that might have just been your reading of it.

The truth is, we all had our ‘then’ realities, just as we have our ‘now’ realities. It is the problem you encounter when you apply your mind to conceptualising the consciousness that lies beyond simplistic rationalisation, as in the either/or ‘fence-sitting’ you talk about. Progress for humanity is about growing and moving on beyond that.

I hope these words and a bit more time will help you heal and work things out for yourself, Chris.

Peace and sublime good wishes…

Rennie Ji

 






Modified by nigel at Mon, Feb 20, 2006, 14:21:45

Previous Recommend Current page Next
hmmm ... Rennie - express relief?
Re: Contact! -- nigel Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
cq ®

02/20/2006, 14:26:21
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




yup, thanks for the laugh Nige, but which orifice were you channelling through?

Seriously though, I think it'd be interesting if Mr D could be encouraged to reply in person.

Don't you?






Modified by cq at Mon, Feb 20, 2006, 14:29:45

Previous Recommend Current page Next
You really think so?
Re: hmmm ... Rennie - express relief? -- cq Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
nigel ®

02/20/2006, 15:36:59
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




>yup, thanks for the laugh Nige, but which orifice were you channelling through?

Seriously though, I think it'd be interesting if Mr D could be encouraged to reply in person.

Don't you?

No, Chris, I don't. Rennie's irrelevant - thirty years out of the inner circle, remember. He already has been invited to reply in person and he has replied and given us a pile of impenetrable, New Age bollocks. You've little hope of educating him and improving him whilst teasing out little pieces of M scandal, if that’s the general idea. What else would be the aim? ‘Rennie Davis abandons Maharaji (again)’ is not the kind of headline that will send shockwaves through the western world, or even the cult.

But, hell, I don't know. Basically I find the guy both boring and depressing, in spite of this flurry of ex-premie excitement. By all means go ahead everyone, if you find it interesting but, if you’re not careful, Rennie's going to end up looking like a lab rat we're doing a pointless experiment on. Unlike Dettmers, Donner, etc. who showed some integrity, he reminds me of David Icke – a hopeless case. One more self-indulgent fantasist pronouncing from on high, secure in his lucrative, otherworldly niche, unworthy of my time or yours.

But I’ll be happy enough if you can prove me wrong here 

NIge







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Prove you wrong? Now what would that prove?
Re: You really think so? -- nigel Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
cq ®

02/20/2006, 15:51:25
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




Rennie's irrelevant?

The guy who Rawat owes more to than anyone else for getting where he is today?

Well, as Steve Martin might say - exCUUUUUUUse me.

I'd like to hear a bit more from him, and I'm surprised to hear that you wouldn't.

Integrity is learned, no?

(forgive me for being a boring old wanky toss-pot for pointing that out, but ... well, SOMEONE should)

- point that out, that is






Modified by cq at Mon, Feb 20, 2006, 15:54:49

Previous Recommend Current page Next
Maybe, you've a point Chris, maybe not...
Re: Prove you wrong? Now what would that prove? -- cq Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
nigel ®

02/20/2006, 16:33:17
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




But if there is some insight to be gleaned from Rennie (maybe because Mick seems to know him) it would probably best be achieved via email, phone calls etc.  It needn't be on the forum at all unless there's something to tell.  Facts are useful.  Rennie's personal salvation might be over-ambitious.

Soliciting questions to collectively put to him still looks like the 'celebrity on stage / grateful listener' set-up I find depressingly reminiscent of cult-land, Q&A's.   We've all been there, and all our experiences are as valid, and in many cases three or more times as long and more painful than Rennie's brief prostration before the holy microphone.       

Rennie exited the the cult around the same time I joined, so I'm not that qualified to judge your statement here, but is it really true that Rennie was:

>The guy who Rawat owes more to than anyone else for getting where he is today?

I'm not saying you're wrong, Chris, but I've never heard anyone else say that.  (He was irrelevant to my own cult involvement, for sure.  Maybe others could comment here?) 

And it looks to me like Prem Rawat had a lot to do with getting Rennie Davis to where he is today.

Hmm, I find them both obnoxious, boring, grim... (yawn)

But do carry on. 

I think I might need to take another forum break...







Previous Recommend Current page Next
obnoxious, boring, grim... (yawn)
Re: Maybe, you've a point Chris, maybe not... -- nigel Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
cq ®

02/20/2006, 16:51:29
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




well, if you need to take another forum break Nige, you don't need me to let you go.

I can understand that my posts might, to some, be boring, grim, etc. - but when the likes of major movers in the realms of Rawat come close to telling it like they remember, I'd rather be willing to listen first and judge later. And that doesn't limit them to only one post.

What I mean is simply this: you're your own helmsman here, as are we all. Personally though, I'd prefer to see you contributing, however much you might feel at the mercy of ... jings, I can't imagine! Obnoxious? Moi?


In the meantime, re Rawat getting famous on Rennie Davis' claims - I take it you've not viewed the "LOTU" video that Amazon is selling?

I can lend you my copy, if you'd like.
(email me at above address, if so).






Modified by cq at Mon, Feb 20, 2006, 17:17:01

Previous Recommend Current page Next
LOTU Video
Re: obnoxious, boring, grim... (yawn) -- cq Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
JHB ®

02/20/2006, 17:17:04
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




I can lend you my copy, if you'd like. (email me at above address, if so).

Chris,

Would that be one of my two PAL copies that I made from the NTSC version a kind person sent me from the US? I've no problem with you lending it out further, but I would be very grateful if you could make a copy for yourself and send mine back to me. Of course, if it's not my copy, then I would appreciate a copy anyway.

John.







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: LOTU Video
Re: LOTU Video -- JHB Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
cq ®

02/20/2006, 17:28:00
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




John, could you email me about this? I did indeed borrow your copy, but I passed it on to someone else.






Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: LOTU Video - guess what I just found? (OT)
Re: Re: LOTU Video -- cq Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
cq ®

02/21/2006, 10:48:44
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




I could have sworn I'd lent it to Loaf.

Anyway, that's good news, I'll get it in the post to you soon. Could you email me your address?







Previous Recommend Current page Next
My address
Re: Re: LOTU Video - guess what I just found? (OT) -- cq Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
JHB ®

02/21/2006, 12:06:44
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




Chris,

That's good news.  My address is:-

Jokas
Limbazi Pagasts
Limbazi Rajons
LV-4011
Latvia

All the best,

John.






Previous Recommend Current page Next
I've seen Rennie clips and read stuff from LOTU and Who is Guru blah,,
Re: obnoxious, boring, grim... (yawn) -- cq Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
nigel ®

02/20/2006, 17:32:22
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




I didn't call you boring or grim, Chris.  It's just the on-going focus on this big fish of the cult's long-lost past that I'm getting depressed by  - both the brainless twaddle-speak that Rennie uses, and this strange, starry-eyed hope around here that he might even be interested in sharing a few naughty secrets from 1975 or whenever. 

>when the likes of major movers in the realms of Rawat come close to telling it like they remember...

I must have missed that one, Chris.   Rennie's done nothing but obfuscate.

I'm with Jim, here.  Rennie's a snake.

Nige







Previous Recommend Current page Next
one post from Rennie, and you've made your mind up?
Re: I've seen Rennie clips and read stuff from LOTU and Who is Guru blah,, -- nigel Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
cq ®

02/20/2006, 17:39:33
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




give the guy a chance to even WANT to open up, why don't you?!






Previous Recommend Current page Next
No, but but I'm not holding my breath.
Re: one post from Rennie, and you've made your mind up? -- cq Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
nigel ®

02/21/2006, 11:28:47
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




Chris, if you read what I've actually been saying in this thread (summarised in my post to Dermot in thread above) my concerns are not about whether or not we talk to Rennie, but how we go about it. 

I'm sure Rennie may have useful information if he feels inclined to share it - fine - JHB made a preliminary invite, now Jim's made a second - which is great.  So Rennie already does have 'a chance to even WANT to open up', as you put it.  I'm doing nothing to stop that, and wouldn't want to. 

I was just offering a personal opinion on Mick's suggestion, since that was what Mick was inviting.

I just don't think we should start petitioning him en masse, as if he were some kind of representative for EV or Rawat - for whom, that kind of approach might be appropriate. 






Modified by nigel at Tue, Feb 21, 2006, 11:33:40

Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: No, but but I'm not holding my breath.
Re: No, but but I'm not holding my breath. -- nigel Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
cq ®

02/21/2006, 11:55:21
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




Nige, I have indeed been reading what you've been saying, and this is how our exchange began:

I said "I think it'd be interesting if Mr D could be encouraged to reply in person. Don't you?" to which you replied "No, Chris, I don't"

I took that as reluctance on your part to have him around.

As it happens, I've been reading some of his ideas on the site Cynthia linked to. It's fascinating stuff, almost as funny as David Icke's!





Related link: http://www.prem-rawat-talk.org/forum/posts/2495.html

Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: Maybe, you've a point Chris, maybe not...definitely NOT
Re: Maybe, you've a point Chris, maybe not... -- nigel Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Cynthia ®

02/20/2006, 17:05:28
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




Rennie Davis was famous for his radicalism in the 60s and mostly because he was one of the Chicago Seven.  Rawat didn't bring him fame, he brought fame to rawat, if anything.  I was definitely was influenced by hearing that Davis was a premie, but I can't say I joined up because of him either.

Have you seen his website?  Did I miss it below?  Feel free to cast your vote for a new humanity!  -

Cynthia 





Related link: Foundation for a New Humanity
Modified by Cynthia at Mon, Feb 20, 2006, 17:06:41

Previous Recommend Current page Next
I rest my case.. doubly obnoxious, doubly pointless ..
Re: Re: Maybe, you've a point Chris, maybe not...definitely NOT -- Cynthia Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
nigel ®

02/20/2006, 17:16:28
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




There's not a hope in hell of getting this corporate new age guru to publically diss a fellow corporate new age guru, (or vice-versa) unless there's something in it for either of them, which there obviously wouldn't be.  But good luck, anyone who wants to try tempting them..






Modified by nigel at Mon, Feb 20, 2006, 17:17:44

Previous Recommend Current page Next
You've got the wrong end of the stick there, Cynth
Re: Re: Maybe, you've a point Chris, maybe not...definitely NOT -- Cynthia Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
cq ®

02/20/2006, 17:35:32
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




I described Rennie as: "the guy who Rawat owes more to than anyone else for getting where he is today"

Like you said: Rawat didn't bring him fame, he brought fame to rawat, if anything.

A point? A palpable one? Well, who's keeping score? (not the Capulets, surely?)







Previous Recommend Current page Next
PS, I just made a discovery
Re: You've got the wrong end of the stick there, Cynth -- cq Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
cq ®

02/21/2006, 11:11:30
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




Hi Cynthia. I only just discovered that the greyed out text at the top of his site links to other pages. And what a laugh they are!

"The new humanity workshop mission is based on an ancient philosophy. The world we inhabit is a psychological construct-thought-reactive-and that our own experiences change as we change our Self."

What command of English grammar!

And there's this:

… The design of humanity envisions a future in which humanity is able to create life. The stomach holds a previously undiscovered source of life that can be accessed. The DNA also holds the vision of a future human being in a protein material. The memory of the entire physical development-human and non-human--is contained within the 23 pairs of chromosomes. However, buried within the mitochondria DNA are trillions of undiscovered stains of non-physical or 'spiritual DNA' holding even more of your legacy and gifts-gifts that can never be taken from you--waiting to be discovered. Workshop participants are able to connect to their spiritual birthright or 'non-physical' DNA. You inherited your entire DNA-an inheritance that includes the memory of every human ancestor.

Trillions of undiscovered stains eh? So, if they've not been discovered … er … how exactly can he talk about them?


Try the link to his book: http://www.thegreatturning.org/ and discover that you "… live in a moment when a new humanity can emerge - unconditional, deeply curious, ever passionate. Releasing yourself from the social harness of consciousness, a new humanity rises naturally out of yourself."

So releasing yourself from consciousness is the new way, eh?

thinks ... didn't we used to call it meditation?





Related link: http://www.thegreatturning.org
Modified by cq at Tue, Feb 21, 2006, 11:25:59

Previous Recommend Current page Next
Like I said - David Icke, all over. Still up for doing the petition?
Re: PS, I just made a discovery -- cq Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
nigel ®

02/21/2006, 11:52:40
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin










Previous Recommend Current page Next
Petition? That was your idea. I never suggested such a thing!
Re: Like I said - David Icke, all over. Still up for doing the petition? -- nigel Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
cq ®

02/21/2006, 11:59:01
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin










Previous Recommend Current page Next
'Group action' then - my take on Mick's suggestion. Whatever...
Re: Petition? That was your idea. I never suggested such a thing! -- cq Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
nigel ®

02/21/2006, 12:23:46
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin










Previous Recommend Current page Next
Nor did I suggest "group action". You need target lessons!
Re: 'Group action' then - my take on Mick's suggestion. Whatever... -- nigel Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
cq ®

02/22/2006, 01:37:52
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin










Previous Recommend Current page Next
I said 'MY take on Mick's suggestion'.
Re: Nor did I suggest "group action". You need target lessons! -- cq Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
nigel ®

02/22/2006, 06:42:29
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




'Group action' was my own choice of phrase and I haven't attributed it to you or anyone else.

I don't know what you mean by 'target lessons' - I didn't realise I was firing at anyone.  I've expressed a couple of fairly basic arguments based on my interpretation of what Mick was suggesting, not with any desire to perpetuate a discussion, but just to have my say.  And I think I've done that. 

Feel free to have the last word if you like, but that's all I want to say on this.  It looks events have already overtaken us anyway (eg. Jim's unilateral email) 

Nige







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Reading Rennie Davis turns my brain to mush...(no text)
Re: PS, I just made a discovery -- cq Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Cynthia ®

02/21/2006, 15:30:33
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin










Previous Recommend Current page Next
funny you should say that. He had much the same effect on me at Millennium '73!
Re: Reading Rennie Davis turns my brain to mush...(no text) -- Cynthia Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
cq ®

02/21/2006, 15:47:32
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin










Previous Recommend Current page Next
Funny as hell, Nigel, LOL
Re: Contact! -- nigel Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Jerry ®

02/21/2006, 14:22:52
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




But since you're in contact could you ask Rennie to elucidate on those 4 bodies and 14 senses of of his. I think he may be onto something there, but I need some clarification just what the fuh he's talking about.






Previous Recommend Current page Next
...and my question is..
Re: Here's an idea: for everybody here, for Rennie Davis -- Mick Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
KarenL ®

02/20/2006, 10:52:01
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




Rennie,

Just exactly WHEN did you stop believing that rawat was LOTU, and what exactly precipitated that realization? The light was presumably still "within inside" you, still blazing away. Rawat was still giving darshan in private settings, so what changed?

Karen

P.S. I reserve the right to ask a second and possible third question to Rennie.







Previous Recommend Current page Next
...and here's mine ...
Re: ...and my question is.. -- KarenL Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
cq ®

02/20/2006, 11:30:36
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




Rennie, in February 1974, you were quoted as saying:

"Either Guru Maharaj Ji is for real, or he's the biggest fraud of all time."

( Ramparts magazine )

My question: how's that fence you're sitting on holding up?







Previous Recommend Current page Next
must read post above from cq
Re: ...and here's mine ... -- cq Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Susan ®

02/21/2006, 21:46:12
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin









Modified by Susan at Tue, Feb 21, 2006, 21:46:41

Previous Recommend Current page Next
I jumped on Dettmers and exes...
Re: Here's an idea: for everybody here, for Rennie Davis -- Mick Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Cynthia ®

02/20/2006, 12:34:35
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




Another really good and thoughtful post, Mick, thanks. 

Remember that with Donner, Dettmers, and some others (including even non-premie Halley), people collectively brainstormed and compiled some polite questions for each of them. And then, in that scenario and spirit, nobody jumped all over their cases. They all got a fair shake from the ex-premie forum.

I don't remember anyone "collectively compiling" questions (maybe some did, but I wasn't in on it).  Folks just asked about what they were interested in or curious about.  More and more information came forward as Dettmers considered his answers and then posted them. 

At one point I complained that some exes seemed to be fawning over himn as a celeb/high profile ex-premie (it was a little much for my taste) and some folks jumped on me for saying so, but in the end no one got hurt.  After all, Michael did reveal some important information about Rawat, not the least of which was that he ran down and killed a bicyclist while driving in India, and had someone else take the blame, while he sped off with his entourage. 

Personally, I don't really care if Rennie Davis ever posts here.  If he wanted to engage anyone, he already knew where to find the forum and could have easily logged in and posted his own letter himself.  His letter was a slight, kind of an afterthought, imo, and doesn't in any way indicate an interest in learning anything about cults or exes or himself for that matter.  Maybe I'm wrong, in which case, he can log in here and post just like everyone else.  I'm not going to cajole the guy. 

Besides, I'd be more interested in hearing from a ex-PAM (premie around Maharaji) who has recently left.  But, I think those days are over, what with confidentiality agreements, etc.






Modified by Cynthia at Mon, Feb 20, 2006, 12:39:07

Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: I jumped on Dettmers and exes...
Re: I jumped on Dettmers and exes... -- Cynthia Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Dermot ®

02/20/2006, 13:28:34
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




Personally, I don't really care if Rennie Davis ever posts here.  If he wanted to engage anyone, he already knew where to find the forum and could have easily logged in and posted his own letter himself.  His letter was a slight, kind of an afterthought, imo, and doesn't in any way indicate an interest in learning anything about cults or exes or himself for that matter.  Maybe I'm wrong, in which case, he can log in here and post just like everyone else.  I'm not going to cajole the guy. 

Besides, I'd be more interested in hearing from a ex-PAM (premie around Maharaji) who has recently left.  But, I think those days are over, what with confidentiality agreements, etc.

Agreed, Cynthia.







Previous Recommend Current page Next
You guys are great!
Re: Re: I jumped on Dettmers and exes... -- Dermot Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Mick ®

02/20/2006, 18:23:33
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




Hi again,

Ok, I woke up from my old codger nap, and I've just read all your posts in response on this thread. Thanks.

btw, I was just putting the idea out there, precisely to get some good feedback from y'all. And everybody weighed in with really good points, and some fun, too. I love it. I really do enjoy listening to other people's various viewpoints on this, and other, subjects.

And I don't think anybody has to worry about too much group-think here (like the dualistic, two sides of the coin i.e. Renniejism stage 2) - particularly once somebody mentions it - we're conscious; so, not to get paranoid about that, either - 'cause we're obviously all very different people who also have some serious life experiences in common, too - nothing wrong with that, imo. Otherwise, none of us ever would have posted, in the first place.

It's certainly ok to agree and work together, too, constructively. It's better than bickering just for the sake of argument, and some camaraderie leaves each person with a better taste when they sign off the web each time. We're all Free thinkers and individuals here, after all, not zombies (cult or ex-cult). That's the beauty of it. And every one of us is a valid human being with our own identity, which nobody can ever take away. Sameness is boring, too. But, empathy and compassion - great!

Honestly, in writing some of these posts (this one and the others) I was thinking Rennie (or one of his friends - he probably has a few ) would probably read all the stuff that's been posted about this in the last week. (Hey, "inquiring minds want to know," right? It's only natural.)

Maybe it's got him thinking now. Whatever...

So, definitely, if he comes around again or emails (or if somebody wants to email him), I don't think anybody here wants to treat him like a celeb - No, but rather to discuss and engage, just like anybody else that showed up to chat.

Also, here's an opportunity for him to take some freaking personal accountability, without the methane spewing out of his quantum ego all over again - that is, if he's capable of that. (A big IF [caps], of course.)

And my real purpose (sure, an intel op): I thought by taking this approach, too, and maybe even formulating some good questions, we might get some decent information (just like we've gotten in the past, as noted) - some more pieces of the collective jigsaw puzzle. If he thought he was walking into a wasp's nest, I'm sure he wouldn't do it, nor would he be forthcoming with any pertinent info, that's all.

And if he replies again, he sure better leave that XXXLg hat at the door! Otherwise, fair is fair, right?

And if he doesn't respond, and we were correct about his disingenuous intentions - which were simply to protect his image and do some damage control - then who the bleep cares anyway, right?

I mean, admittedly, he's old news. It's not as if one of the still remaining official flunkies on the Titanic jumped ship, and we picked her/him up - and did some CPR. That's a tight ship, these days, btw. Making the aspirants sign confidentiality contracts. That's unreal, and has got to be a major Red Flag to anybody even considering the sphincter constrictive Prem package of Real Ham. For most people nowadays, the only 'key' they'd want, after really analyzing the control freakdom of the Rawat personality cult, is their own key to the highway. Vroomm, we're outta here... [Gee, I forgot where I parked the green Rolls, or was it the Lamborghini - no, the Aston Martin - today? So little time, so many expensive cars. Oh, it's the Mercedes. No, those are all the perfect bungmeister's, bought and paid for by his cult slave laborers. Oh yeah, here's the '89 Chevy. Please start, this time... cough, cough, cough, unk, unk, unk, vroom, vroom, vroommmmmmmmmm...]

[So, really, WHY Did you leave, Rennie? What was going on, really, inside the organization and with the zitted, potato-chip crunching, jamoca almond fudge munching, toking, cognac swizzling, devotee-shtupping bungmeister " and the inner circle? I mean, you must have a few revealing stories. C'mon. Also, you missed out on decades more of some really weird shit from Prem.]

So I think, first, Rennie Really Really needs to check out ex-premie.org and all the info available there. It's a real wake up call, for anybody who was ever involved with the Rawat cult. Now, there is just so much information on that site, and well organized, too -- a Lot of hard work, by so many many contributors. And there's Finch's site, and Drek, too, Dave... Then, just maybe, Rennie will be in a 'better space' vis a vis an ex-pr forum. If not, who cares, so what, right? We tried. His loss, not ours. Next...

Thanks again to Everybody who responded. It was just an idea, from a very tired old dude.

- Mick


P.S. I actually enjoyed doing the other post (a thread or two down) in response to Nigel. If nothing else, when I post (however infrequently), I do want people here to feel good, validated, and intellectually, it is fun to poke holes in all the bull caca cult ladus whenever the air starts to stink. What divine sport - our Lila! [ok, couldn't resist that one] Airs the room a bit, anyway, methinks.

If Rennie (or any premie aka Rawat 'student') is reading: most of us are not intentionally mean here. Ex-premies just don't take no bs from nobody no how no more. Hey, it's way way better than groveling at the feet of the perfect bungmeister, faces pressed to the floor, or paying buckos for those insipid mind-control Prem cult videos - or living in some kind of fantasy dream world.. Most of us are pretty grounded.

oops, tea kettle is boiling. cuppa...







Previous Recommend Current page Next
That's all well and good Mick, but . . .
Re: Here's an idea: for everybody here, for Rennie Davis -- Mick Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Dr.wow ®

02/21/2006, 21:42:58
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




People just giving up the reigns of their lives to these manipulative dictators posing as spiritual people.

That would be reins.

not to rains on yer parade






Modified by Dr.wow at Tue, Feb 21, 2006, 21:51:50

Previous Recommend Current page Next
That was an obvious Freudian slip, I'd say...
Re: That's all well and good Mick, but . . . -- Dr.wow Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Neville B ®

02/22/2006, 14:32:28
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin










Previous Recommend Current page Next