Rennie: street fighter in flannel pyjamas?
  Archive
Posted by:
nigel ®

02/19/2006, 16:52:24
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




[A few thoughts on forum courtesy. I’ve started a new thread so I don’t have to post this as a reply and give the impression the following is addressed to anyone personally.]

I can’t imagine for one minute Rennie Davis ever intended to show up in person here, so maybe the degree of ‘courtesy’ shown by exes is nothing more than a philosophical discussion on the appropriate way to behave on a web-forum.

My own theory for Rennie’s letter arriving right now, just after we’d been discussing him after John posted his ‘open letter’ was simple damage limitation – not the heartfelt plea for common understanding etc. in which he couched his spin-laden disclaimer. People who google the name ‘Rennie Davis’, say, because they’re interested in his venture capital business, would quickly discover some missing pages from his CV, and hostile voices calling for him to explain a few things – and his failure to respond would be seen by an outsider as less than impressive. Therefore, as every politician knows, a piece of soft flannel will wash a long way if the tone is conciliatory.

But Rennie included *nothing’ that a modern premie would find objectionable, and I’d be surprised if Jossi isn’t wetting himself at this evidence that the ‘Lord’ claims really were the work of over-enthusiastic, self-publicising Westerners who are now apologising like crazy for past errors, just like he’s been telling the Wikipedians. The letter will probably re-appear on the Premie sites, if it hasn’t already.

But, seriously, just suppose Rennie Davis did decide to post here and defend his views, or maybe even learn a bit more about the ‘hurt’ he’s apparently baffled by…

As threads, go, Rennie’s over-and-out communique was an instant hit, getting some two-dozen replies within as many hours. But not all of them were warm and friendly. In fact, only one or two could be described as such. So what does that really say about us? Not a lot that isn’t already obvious, in my opinion. And I don’t mean we’re a rude bunch of bastards. Because, apart from Anth (joke ), truly we’re not.

And you can’t even narrow this into a simplistic, good cop / bad cop framework. You can observe a whole rainbow of styles from the ‘thanks Rennie’ extreme (Anth / Lexy perhaps?) to the ‘what a snake!’ other end (Jim / Susan / Mick?). Others (cq?) sit somewhere within that continuum. My own post was probably ¾ of the way towards bad cop, which I’m comfortable with. I could have been more accommodating, but I could also have been a lot more critical…

But these contrasts are just a matter of dressing, not flavour, since the same objections appear repeatedly below, whether the poster was sounding off or holding back. You could also run Rennie’s letter past any random sample of ex-premies who have posted here or on past forums, but no longer do so, and the responses would pan out the same, I’m sure.  It's a collection of views at a moment in time of how ex-premies feel about Rennie Davis, and potentially useful to Rennie Davis if he has a mind to read carefully.  It might help the spiritual growth of the floral prints on his pyjamas. 

The scale of expressed hostility here reflects the degree to which we each feel hurt or cheated out of a significant chunk of our younger lives by the Rawat cult. I still feel both, and am entitled to say so. When I signed up in 1977 premies were still parading Rennie Davis as Trophy Number One to get impressionable people interested. Although Rennie was probably half-way out of the door by then, his role in establishing and legitimising the culture that got me and thousands of others ensnared should never be underestimated.

But I digress. Back to my hypothetical scenario of Rennie actually engaging on the forum: Suppose we had all, from Jim downwards, opted for the ‘Hi Rennie – thanks for sharing, peace brother, ah, well, we all live and learn…’ angle? In the hope he would stay around long enough for himself to learn gradually what we really thought, as and when it felt safe to do so. Would it work?

I bet you Rennie would just nip in, say ‘thanks everyone’ then beggar off again, telling his PR team: ‘Another job well done, Batman!’. So what possible point is there in holding back? If he was interested, he’d have already been here engaging without any prompt from us.

Rennie has been making his thoughts and feelings public property for nigh-on forty years. That kind of hardened street-fighter should be immune to the occasional jibe on his path towards that ‘breakthrough in human consciousness’ which he is still touting however many years it is since he announced much the same thing in Who is Guru Maharaji. And now, thanks to the internet, it is our turn to go public.

The forum offers a snapshot of ex-premie feeling at a given moment – but only if we’re honest. Listen well, Rennie, and let the Divil take the hindmost…

Nige

 






Modified by nigel at Sun, Feb 19, 2006, 17:02:34

Previous Recommend Current page Next

Replies to this message

Thoughts
Re: Rennie: street fighter in flannel pyjamas? -- nigel Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Premie_Spouse ®

02/19/2006, 18:48:30
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




I've not joined in the Rennie discussion as I have no idea who or what he is.  But, his letter irritated me because of its "catch phrases".  For example, "each of us creates our own reality", is the biggest bunch of crap.  You can't "create reality", it just is.  You can do a lot with your perception of it and how you handle reality, but you can't "create a new reality".  Ick.  Stop trying to be whatever-the-hell-that is.

Sorry, Nigel.  I had to get that out or explode, but I'll be good now, I promise.






Previous Recommend Current page Next
Is rennie open to looking at flaws of deepak thinking?
Re: Rennie: street fighter in flannel pyjamas? -- nigel Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
bill ®

02/20/2006, 00:09:05
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




I mean, if he just wants to not know, then what drove him from rawat?

If he wants to know the foundational flaws in deepak and rawat and new age thinking, then I invite him to have that conversation.

He did leave rawat, but he did not leave the basic ideas that rawat and deepak lean on.

THOSE ideas, can be discussed here as a separate issue from the issue of how those foundational ideas, lead him to say the sentences that he did here that people are mentioning.

The nature of reality is mercifully enough, provably not supportive of deepak. If Rennie is willing to see if the fundamental ideas deepak tells him are fatally in error, then he will be walking the road of testable truth.

And that will be a road of redemption.I invite him to walk that road, with us. He has rebelled in the past, I invite him to rebel against the claim that he has too quickly embraced flawed ideas about life, and to stand his ground while allowing his ideas to be subjected to the fire to either be tempered, or burned.

If it is a manly road you walk, then stand among us and discuss, or, if you leave today, it is like the gaurd turned stump in the monty python holy grail. 







Previous Recommend Current page Next
I suppose our parents could be 100% totally wrong.
Re: Is rennie open to looking at flaws of deepak thinking? -- bill Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
bill ®

02/21/2006, 00:27:12
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




And that they indeed were limited by fear based heritage thinking that is all based in untrue myth.

And that our generation is the boom that went off and inflated the new universe of released spiritual mojo.

However, before relegating the -ents- to the gravestone of the generation before -the freedom-, I think it only fair to give them a just trial to see if any of thier hallucinations about common sense limits based on reality have any merit whatsoever.

Hell, I dont care if we kangaroo the court even!

But I suggest we pause before embarking on the great journey into the infinite community, and say some words about the hallucinated limits of our possibly 100% totally wrong parents ideas.







Previous Recommend Current page Next
yes, Rennet Ji's letter = public relations damage control
Re: Rennie: street fighter in flannel pyjamas? -- nigel Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Mick ®

02/20/2006, 03:37:05
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




Ok, here's my own subjective 'take' on this:

When I first read Rennie's letter - knowing him way back when and his political background, and then 3 decades later reviewing his more recent and current activities (via the internet) - I immediately felt strongly that there was this other hidden agenda, too, which you have expressed:

"My own theory for Rennie’s letter arriving right now, just after we’d been discussing him after John posted his ‘open letter’ was simple damage limitation – not the heartfelt plea for common understanding etc. in which he couched his spin-laden disclaimer. People who google the name ‘Rennie Davis’, say, because they’re interested in his venture capital business, would quickly discover some missing pages from his CV, and hostile voices calling for him to explain a few things – and his failure to respond would be seen by an outsider as less than impressive."

Like many here, too, I also discerned some attempt by Rennie to come to closure quickly - however casually and superficially, in his typically self-centered inflated manner.

However, while attempting to seemingly play both sides of the fence (and i.e. the 2 Stages skit routine), his remarks were also sickeningly patronizing and a bit provocatory, as well as indicative that he is still partial to the guru (of course as a lower, less divine entity, now), but still entrapped in his mistaken beliefs in the magic guru candle (for example), which is an obvious vestige of his indoctrination long ago at Prem Nagar ashram.

References to "the ‘knowledge’ of Guru Maharaj Ji" and statements like "Guru Maharaj Ji was able to create an energetic bridge to my light body" are evidence that he never investigated further into the cult roots, history, etc., nor questioned any of it more deeply after departing to become his own guru.

Similarly, as usual, Rennie doesn't have his facts straight. Prem was 8 when he became guru, not 6 (which was when he got initiated by dada).

He also confuses the "kill the guru" aspect with Prem's "tradition"; in fact, my own first contact with that concept came from the Buddhist tradition, or perhaps it was from reading an interview with Richard Alpert (aka RammeDAss) back in the 1960s: "If you find the guru, kill him." [something like that] It was definitely not any part of the bhakti yoga (devotion) that we were continually force-fed by the maha and his minions. I don't think "Kill the guru" was part of Arti, either, or the initiation oath, or the cult vocabulary, was it?!. But, hey, if that works for somebody... (Hmmm, maybe that's why I got put on WPC security detail, protecting the Perfect Master of our age. So, maybe I just missed something, and Kill the Guru IS an important second stage of the tradition, after all... or Maybe Rennet Ji needs to be put on the bongo premie list at programs; ya never know, after all... )

Based on Rennie's own words regarding this forum ("I suppose if all the readers of this web site agreed with this point of view, your site would have to change its direction or go out of business"), I got no impression whatsoever that he really wanted a genuine discussion on this forum - at least among equals, or with anyone who might intelligently challenge his nebulous suppositions or fantasies. I don't think he's up to that; he doesn't have the balls, or the brains to back it up. [Do you, Rennie?] It would probably be too embarrassing and confronting for him. He doesn't want his ego bubble challenged, or his balloon popped. I mean, he's like a "public personality," after all. Wow!

Conversely, after reviewing all the related documents over at www.ex-premie.org, the Mikes (Donner and Dettmers) were much more straight up, receptive, forthcoming, and down-to-earth. And Pat Halley, the Pie Man, he surprised almost everybody -- turns out he's practically a Saint - metal plate and all in his reconstructed skull and face. He actually forgave Rawat, the cult, and instructor Fakiranand for trying to murder him. Seriously.

On the contrary, Rennet Ji's words would seem to indicate he thinks being superficially "charming and positive" is more important than personal integrity. He doesn't want to look in the mirror - at least not the mirror of his own actions and the consequences on others.

I find these remarks quite revealing:

"Thank you for your invitation to speak." Yeah, Rennie, our community coordinator sent you an invitation to speak at this program of blissful ex-premies. [quietly] btw, I have taken the liberty of handing out these darshan envelopes, for cash-only contributions to your non-profit org. (We're quite used to this procedure.)

"Probably no one knows better than me the need to feel my own righteousness through judgments and blame." His own righteousness? You're right; nobody would know - better than YOU. [with the capital 'Y']

"I feel I owe Guru Maharaj Ji an apology as well." ????? So, when does Rennet Ji get paid back for this abjectly contrite appearance with the apostates? Or, maybe he's got (or could use) some premie business connections, too? [or, Don't tell me You boned Marolyn, too? I remember your routine: sitting there face-to-face looking intently into whichever horny-celibate nubile premie shes eyes, and then the old back massage routine. It worked sometimes, I guess. And, darting out for cigs.]

"I felt touched by the beauty of my own spirit." [cough]

"...we spent a week in a northern Indian ashram filled with Americans, many of them people that had participated in anti-war demonstrations I had organized." As if Rennie single-handedly organized these demonstrations, right? Other sources indicate that was Not the case. (Of course, we wouldn't want to spoil the 'mystique.')

"I felt skeptical—maybe closer to what you feel today." Maybe he thinks people here are just malcontented former aspirants. Hey, Rennie, after you split, some of us practiced this so-called Knowledge for another 25 years. So, oh yeah, I see where you're at now, Rennie. Been there, done that. [That was always a good hippie ego comeback putdown line.] Btw, you seen the chakras, too? Great colors - outa this world, bro! Nectar - sweeeett! Listening to those flutes... So, dude, like why did you leave, anyway?

In his letter, Rennie compares himself to Pascal. In the Forbes magazine interview, he compares himself with Copernicus. See the massive ego? Or, maybe Rennet Ji is the next Stephen Hawking. You got PhDs in math and physics, too?

Then, you must know Los' Theorem, Symmetric case: Given a set V of vertices and a collection of edges on V, either this graph or its edge-complement has the complete graph on V as its transitive closure.

@xyzPxy&Pyz->Pxz.&@xyzQxy&Qyz->Qxz.&@xyQxy->Qyx.&@xyPxy|Qxy.=>@xyPxy|@xyQxy (Los' Theorem)

[Let P and Q be transitive relations and Q is symmetric, such that for every pair (x,y) either P holds or Q holds. Then if there is any pair (a,b) for which P does not hold, then for every pair (x,y), Q does hold.]

btw, Rennie Ji, what's your hat size -- XXXLarge (with capital Xs)? If it expands any further, the universe will be destroyed! Beep! beep! beep! beep! This emergency just calls for 'ThermoMan.'

"Some of the readers of your web site may not realize..." Yeah, Rennie. You are the superior power in person, oh satrugu. Has it Ever occurred to you, maybe You don't realize? [Of course it hasn't. Oy vey, what was I thinking...]

"I thought he was charming and positive." Yeah, after all, that's what's so important. The car salesman who sold me that lemon piece of sh-- was also charming and positive, too. So was the guy who was trying to sell me expensive term life insurance I didn't need. Hey, that's sales, for ya.

"millions of people today are coming to this remarkable understanding." Where do your stats come from, Rennie? The same place as Bush's pre-war intelligence? Bend over, drop trousers, and let's take a look.

"an extraordinary new idea now reaching critical mass." Great -- so, when does the Astrodome levitate, and the alien mothership come, right, etc.? I mean, remember when you were saying this exact same thing about the critical mass of people receiving Knowledge [big K] in this world?

"In the two-stage guru tradition, first you create the experience of being the devotee. Then you create the experience of rejecting the guru." No, Rennie, this was NEVER a part of the Prem Rawat cult tradition, nor what we were Ever taught in his cult, by the Perfect Master - or anyone else! That would have been blasphemy, heresy - grounds for ex-communication, as it were -- or getting your head bonked with a zealot devotee's baragon or hammer! [You must have slept in and missed Arti way too many mornings. Oh, the terrible burden of being a cult celebrity.]

"Blaming others for what happens in one’s life is a stage of awareness and there’s nothing wrong with any stage of awareness. Perhaps a part of humanity is getting ready to move on, however, into a new understanding." Yes, Rennie, you are the vanguard of the NEW movement, the White Panthers, SNCC, Chicago Seven, spokesman for the Perfect SatGuru, somebody once paid by IBM, after all. So, when are You going to move onto a NEW understanding? This stuff you spout now sounds awfully like repackaged stuff that you said 30+ years ago.

"I don’t feel embarrassed about what I have done at any stage of my life." Sounds like George W. Bush! Funny you should mention him in your letter, too, for some reason...
"Guru Maharaj Ji, Rennie Davis, George Bush or other public personalities". Yes, you have now placed yourself in that Holy Trinity of divine avatars and seers, Rennie. You, maha, and W. - and the NEW World Order. [excuse me while I kiss the sky, and barf]

"In a bold departure from the human condition.." Does this mean you have left the mere mortals behind and attained to being a Supreme Superman, oh Great Soul? Or, is this just some more of your predictable bs - or maybe your personal version of 'talking in tongueS'? After all, white man speak with...

"Perhaps this apology and somewhat long explanation can lend a hand to all the ex-devotees of Guru Maharaji Ji." Yeah, well, thanks but no thanks, Rennet Ji. I'm starting to get indigestion from your curdled cheesy enzymes. Maybe THIS response can lend a hand to YOUR own spiritual awakening -- from 'denial.' [That's called Step #1, by the way, Mr. Davis.]

Hey, Rennie [if you're lurking - you sly dogg], if you ever want some genuine, honest discussions with Real Human Beings - that is, sans merde - drop in again sometime. But check that XXXLg hat at the door. This is the Company of Truth, after all.

Ciao,


-- Mick


P.S. That's why I responded the way I did to Rennie's letter, in a post the other day. Bad cop. Reason: Good cop approach doesn't work with an unmitigated bullshitter. You gotta slap 'em around a bit, let 'em know you're wise to their shit; then if they settle down, ok, time for good cop. [Hey, we've all seen worse here, right?! Why should a puffed-up celeb get special treatment? This was all about Him, anyway, not us. If in doubt, just read the letter again.]

If it turns out Rennie comes around again, and actually becomes a straight-up guy, then ok -"sorry." [gee, that was easy]. sorry. sorry. that's pretty sorry, isn't it? like,sorry, dude. ciao.

I mean, lots of us had to listen to him bullshit - for years - going on and on and on and on. Now, it's his turn to Shut up and listen, for a change.

Also,
r.e. a post further down: I don't think "bolshy" is in my Lexycon. However, I did see a ballet on the tele once, and I asked my friend about it. She said it was "bolshi-" (or something like that), and I said, "No, they're very good!"

Hahaha.

When I was in Canada last year doing propagation for the proles, I must have missed something there, too. They're really loony about their dollars. In fact, Loony-Toony.

Oh well, it must be some kind of dialect tick.

Or, maybe it was in a skit with that bearded guy, Grouchy Marx. Or was that Lennon? A working-class hero is no fun to be.

I dunno... Gee, I only made it through grad school... I mean, it's not as if I were the great Rennet Ji. I mean, he's got 4 separate bodies, after all, and wears an XXXLg hat. Who can compete with that? (except maybe Maharaji, Deepak, Trump, Bush - or perhaps Hyacinth Bucket, oops, Bouquet) Surely not Abbie, not Jerry, not Kunstler, not Coffin, not Seale, and certainly not me.

Maybe we can go Quayle hunting sometime, too...

LOL









Previous Recommend Current page Next
Rennie Davis and Google searches...
Re: yes, Rennet Ji's letter = public relations damage control -- Mick Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Cynthia ®

02/20/2006, 05:51:17
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




Good post Mick.  I think that Rennie Davis is probably quite savvy about the internet and Google searches.  Hell, if he Googled "Prem Rawat" and "Maharaji" he figured out right quick that the ex-premies get high ratings on the major search engines.

I figure Rennie Davis doesn't want his name showing up on Google or Yahoo in association with Prem Rawat or Guru Maharaj Ji, seeing he's white-washed his own involvement in a destructive cult.

Interesting to observe his machinations, though, to brush ex-premies off.  Street theater.







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Brilliant post, Mick
Re: yes, Rennet Ji's letter = public relations damage control -- Mick Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Anthony ®

02/20/2006, 06:16:25
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




When I saw Rennie's reply my first reaction was great surprise, as I had thought, and said in a post, that the chances of him doing so were akin to those of a snowball in hell.

I was amazed at the anodyne content of the letter, its total lack of substance, and the way he wrapped up the whole of the Maharaji experience as first enthusiastically falling in with a guru, then next, as a natural development, killing the guru.

Kerplonk, end of story. No personal detail of the thought processes which led him to abandon Maharaji at such an early stage and flit to his next purely altruistic world redeeming venture.

I then concluded that it was actually written for others, who might arrive here via google and wonder about the whole deal.
It was a neatly constructed pre-emptive defence which wrote off this period of his past as a youthful outing typical of so many of his contemporaries, and that the people here were just, well, killing the guru, as you do, period.

Thing is about Rennie, I think it quite possible that he is sincere, self-serving, gullible, street-wise, superficially attractive and charming yet maybe quite empty all at the same time.

Such people exist, and can even come to head up governments, and make you vote for them. It's quite scary.

I'm voting Tory next time.







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Anth, just responded to your Vietnam post way below --nt
Re: Brilliant post, Mick -- Anthony Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Mick ®

02/20/2006, 19:45:53
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin










Previous Recommend Current page Next
Mick, Anthony is not Anth.
Re: Anth, just responded to your Vietnam post way below --nt -- Mick Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
AJW ®

02/21/2006, 08:47:29
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




Hi Mick,

Although I sign my posts off as "Anth" and my real name is "Anthony", my handle here is AJW. The person who writes as Anthony isn't me.

To sum up:

Anthony the Anthony writes as Anthony.

Anthony the Anth writes as AJW.

I've been posting here on and off for seven or eight years, and I still don't know how many people Gerry and Jerry are.

I read your response to the Vietnam post below btw and replied.

Anth the Anthony the AJW






Previous Recommend Current page Next
Something needs repeating, Mick
Re: yes, Rennet Ji's letter = public relations damage control -- Mick Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Dermot ®

02/20/2006, 08:03:51
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




not for any particular reason except it's hilarious...


>>>>In his letter, Rennie compares himself to Pascal. In the Forbes magazine interview, he compares himself with Copernicus. See the massive ego? Or, maybe Rennet Ji is the next Stephen Hawking. You got PhDs in math and physics, too?

Then, you must know Los' Theorem, Symmetric case: Given a set V of vertices and a collection of edges on V, either this graph or its edge-complement has the complete graph on V as its transitive closure.

@xyzPxy&Pyz->Pxz.&@xyzQxy&Qyz->Qxz.&@xyQxy-

>Qyx.&@xyPxy|Qxy.=>@xyPxy|@xyQxy (Los' Theorem)

[Let P and Q be transitive relations and Q is symmetric, such that for every pair (x,y) either P holds or Q holds. Then if there is any pair (a,b) for which P does not hold, then for every pair (x,y), Q does hold.]

btw, Rennie Ji, what's your hat size -- XXXLarge (with capital Xs)? If it expands any further, the universe will be destroyed! Beep! beep! beep! beep! This emergency just calls for 'ThermoMan.<<<<<<<

If Rennet JI ( again, hilarious) reads any of this stuff it should be your two posts.And as you knew the guy in the flesh ..what better?







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Hey Mick, Please don't go away: Great stuff
Re: yes, Rennet Ji's letter = public relations damage control -- Mick Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Ocker ®

02/20/2006, 15:23:36
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin











Previous Recommend Current page Next
Holy Mick--eral andy, the voice of god.
Re: Hey Mick, Please don't go away: Great stuff -- Ocker Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
bill ®

02/20/2006, 22:58:48
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin










Previous Recommend Current page Next
Here's a very interesting 1979 retrospective on Rennie et al
Re: Rennie: street fighter in flannel pyjamas? -- nigel Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
Jim ®

02/23/2006, 13:41:24
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




This is an article (chapters from a book?) written by a former anti-war activist with a very interesting, well-written section on Rennie Davis and his momentous introduction of the Lord of the Universe to his crowd at Berkley. 

Unfortunately, I tried to cut and paste in either PDF or HTML but, for some reason, my browser kept getting stuck.  Perhaps someone else might have better luck.





Related link: "Kiss my Lotus Ass!"

Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: Here's a very interesting 1979 retrospective on Rennie et al - cut & paste test
Re: Here's a very interesting 1979 retrospective on Rennie et al -- Jim Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
cq ®

02/23/2006, 16:10:59
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




QUOTE

... "Show Us Your Lotus Ass, Rennie!"
(Bliss and Fear in Berkeley)
I have a recurrent nightmare. I'm in a great hall filled with people and turbulent energy,
everyone's shouting and waving signs. Some cry FOR?, the rest cry AGAINST! I'm kneeling
on the floor with a broken pencil and a small scrap of paper, my finger is bleeding, I'm still
trying to write "No two of us know the same reality," but the blood gets in the way. I look
up. Everyone is staring at me. A dreadful silence settles, and the signs begin to fall … .
I had it again the night after Rennie Davis came to town, bearing the message of his new
Perfect Master, the fifteen-year-old guru Maharaj Ji, known to his detractors as "that fat
kid." The story of Rennie's sudden conversion was already a legend of our time: en route to
Paris to meet with Madame Binh to celebrate the end of the Vietnam War, a series of
"coincidences" diverted Rennie to India, to receive illumination while watching the Perfect
Master do perfect wheelies on a motorcycle, spattering mud in the faces of his disciples.

ENDQUOTE






Modified by cq at Thu, Feb 23, 2006, 16:25:21

Previous Recommend Current page Next
cut & paste test works - but needs formatting into paragraphs.
Re: Re: Here's a very interesting 1979 retrospective on Rennie et al - cut & paste test -- cq Top of thread Archive
Posted by:
cq ®

02/23/2006, 16:13:00
Author Profile


Alert Forum Admin




anyone care to spend the time? It looks like a fascinating read (honest!) but I'm not sure about the copyright issue.






Previous Recommend Current page Next