|
|||
|
| Re: So a "commandment" isn't a commandment? LOL!!!! | |||
| Re: So a "commandment" isn't a commandment? LOL!!!! -- Jim | Top of thread | Forum | |
|
You're deep into Monty Python territory, mate. Rawat called it a commandment and you can't even admit that. The commandment meant, "instead of wallowing in doubt, practice knowledge and you will see for yourself it is real". It is real mate. No "room for doubt" when that's happening. Yes, you are a liar. Despicable, in fact. Liar? Hardly. Why do you resort to such tactics? Is it because your arguments are so weak? And while we're on the topic of integrity, why don't you explain to the folks again your plot to improperly borrow someone's password so you could eavesdrop on a forum you were not invited to, and how you were barred from this forum by your fellow ex-premies as a result. Remember those past indiscretions mate? You're in no position to make such claims. So therefore you have to think about the situation, right? In other words, wonder if you got the right advice -- in other words, entertain doubts about it. I'll tell you when not to doubt. When you experience something first hand. To doubt at that point is to doubt yourself. In order to know if the directions are accurate you have to think about it and consider the possibility they aren't. In other words, doubt them. Okay, let me get this straight. You can tell if the directions are accurate when you're out there lost if you doubt it. So your having doubts about your directions, in a state of confusion, and you're pondering turning back, and that very doubt and confusion somehow... magically... helps you to know the directions are accurate. How absurd! How devoid of reality! This borders on sheer downright stupidity. You must not be a very good lawyer... are you you. But, to be fair and give credit where it's due, over time many religions at least acknowledge the fact that people do naturally doubt and try to address those doubts substantively. Name one. You're just making this shit up as you go aren't you. Rawat refuses to have something so basic as an open, unscripted honest discussion with anyone. That's hardly the sign of someone who respects reason or the intellect. Reason and intellect will not address your problem mate. More importantly, it has precious little to do with the heart, which is what he does engage in "unscripted honest discussion" for. Modified by jonx at Wed, Aug 10, 2005, 00:59:53 |
| Previous | Recommend Current page | Next |
| Replies to this message |
|