After the New York Times printed an interview and background material on young Prem by an Indian journalist who understood the Indian background some early premies wrote Letters to the Editor "rebutting" the criticism. I wonder if any of them are still premies?
'my son is hynotized' ... 'I have received the Knowledge'
More on 'The Guru Business' ...
The spiritual delight members of the Divine Light Mission find in
experiencing knowledge through the Guru Maharaj ji is not always shared
by their families, who may know other truths and be pained by the
separations these differences bring. The deeply emotional response of
such groups to Khushwant Singh's article, "The guru business, 'Do you
know the aim of life?'" which appeared in this magazine of April 8, is
reflected in the following letters to the editor.
The energy within
Aside from Mr. Singh's flair for making inexpressibly exquisite
(this is, admittedly, subjective) experiences seem like the grossest
inanities, the major inaccuracy of the article is in his deseription of
the experience called "Knowledge." It is not, as Mr. Singh suggests, a
mantra, or "sacred" syllable whispered in the ear of the initiate.
Rather, It is a direct experience of primordial energy within. It can
be seen internally as a brilliant, all-encompassing Light. It can be
heard internally as completely compelling harmonies. lt can be tasted
internally as sweetness. Lastly, lt can be apprehended as a constant
vibration of subtlemost frequcncy. This last phenomenon is descrlbed by
various faiths as a "Word" (which was "In the beginning . . ." John i,
1), Shem Hamephorash, Ram Nam, mahamantra, etc.
SIMON ZALKIND
Brooklyn, N. Y.
Sour fruit
I am one who has experienced the "knowledge" and found lt to be the antithesis of what lt purports to be.
At my "knowledge session" the holy man who was revealing this
"knowledge" asked us to give up all the money we had with us to the
ashram. When some held back, he scoffed at them and said they were not
ready to receive this "knowledge." Although one woman was willing to
surrender her half of a bank account she was told to leave because she
would not give up her husband's half of the account.
After I recelved "knowledge" I went to several premie (receiver
of knowledge) gatherings. The majority of people at these gatherings
were frighteningly fanatic and I found myself being dictated to by
premies who had been meditating longer than myself. I was told I must
go to India for the festival, I must give my money to the ashram, and
so an and so forth. I was also inundated with literature telling me to
go out and spread this "knowledge."
My most recent experience with this movement is the reason for
this letter. A friend of mine was told to leave a house [she was living
in] because she was not a believer in this particular guru. It did not
matter that she had paid her reut or that she had been welcome long
before the other residents turned to this "knowledge": this house must
be strictly for premies.
Intolerance such as this stems from the premies' inability to
cope with ideas outside their own. Their world is very fragile and
great pains are taken for its protection. It is tragic that basically
good, and I think peace starved people, get snared in this trap. Of
course the premies have pat answers to every one of my statements but
words are not enough. One can only know something by the fruits it
bears and 1 would say that this particular fruit is very sour.
SUSAN E. LYMAN
Canton, N. Y.
Neither beads nor cbants
True knowledge of God should not tell us to shave our heads or live
adrift from society, or even give up everything we own. If we want
proof of God and how to realize Him and become perfect, that should be
all we want or need. We should not need mystic words or beads to go
along with it or be it. The knowledge of God must be something which
can be meditated upon at all times, which will make us act as the Bible
teaches.
Guru Maharaj ji purports to give these things, techniques of
God-realization. He does not give a mantra, beads, or chants, nor does
he ask for money or anything material. Rather, he can and does give
direet experience of God. If a person can find and realize God directly
by reading Scriptures, chanting, or counting the beads of the rosary,
then let him. But if he wants and needs proof, then he must have an
experience that's given directly by a living teacher.
THOMAS C. SWAIN
Greenlawn, N. Y.
The unbidden guest
Guru Maharaj ji was present at our Seder table this year. Not in
person, but by the evident destruction he has wrought upon our lives.
In fact, my husband and I were to see each other alone across the
holiday table. Only last year, our daughter was here. A radiant girl of
17 who baked and cooked with her mother, a talented young woman
anticipating college entrance in the fall; an only child who showed
bright promise and for whom we had such hope!
Now she seems in a hypnotic trance. She pays lip service to
love and peace, but her "love" makes her indifferent to our pain, and
she practices what she has been taught by the Guru, a philosophy called
"nonattachment." In keeping with this, she has left her parents as
readily as she has left her home and fled from her school.
There are other families whose lives have been disrupted. Let
us consider the widowed mother whose daughter left College one month
before graduation because the ashrarn required her services. Let us
speak of the family whose child left for India, lulling them into the
belief that she was taking a school-sponsored trip to Canada. (The
invitation arrived in the mail on college letterhead!) This family
received a letter each week from their daughter, mailed to them from
the ashram in Montreal, before they inadvertently learned that the
College had never sponsored such a trip and that the ashram had
perpetrated a hoax. We must speak too of those children who, at 16 and
17, departed for India against their parents' wishes, having been
informed by the ashram that there was no legal action parents could
take past the age of 15.
We parents are separated by geography and anonymity. We are united only by pain.
NAME WITHHELD
Whitestone, N. Y.
Aphorism
The article written about Guru Maharaj ji reminds me of a saying: If a pickpocket meets a saint, he will see only his pockets.
STEPHEN PEARSON
Poughkeepsie, N. Y.
Despair
Thank you! For one day in the past six months I didn't cry, thanks to your article.
My son, who is normally very sensible and bright, is hypnotized
by Guru Maharaj ji. Is there anything we can do to keep him and his
traveling mahatma out of this country?
NAME WITHHELD
Plainview, N. Y.
Awakening
I am a physician practicing internal medicine and I have received the Knowledge of Balyogeshwar (Shri Guru Maharaj ji).
Every person is aware that he has a body and a mind. There is
some debate as to whether he has a soul or a spirit. Certainly medical
science does not attempt to answer this question. Yet, there clearly is
an energy keeping the body and mind going, keeping the heart beating,
the lungs breathing. The Knowledge of Guru Maharaj ji is not
philosophy, words, religion or ideology. By means of simple natural
techniques, Guru Maharaj ji shows us how to turn our awareness and our
senses inward in order to experience this life energy. These
experiences exist in everyone. Maharaj ji points them out to us. They
(Continued an Page 83)
do not make one want to leave this world and just meditate.
lnstead, they awaken the desire Lot full activity, for full service to
humanity. They completely relieve the emptiness and depression so
commonly experienced. They bring the mind to a peaceful, clear stato
which, contrary to Mr. Singh's cominents about the benefits of a
tortured mind, provides one with an unimpeded means to fully express
whatever talents he has been given: our creativity, our skills, and our
ability to love.
As a physician, I approached this with a skeptical, analytic,
mind. I haue now had the opportunity to practice this Knowledge for 10
months and each day I am made more aware of its unique and wonderful
nature.
EDWARO S. HANZELIK, M.D.
Divine Health Care Services
New York
Prodigals' return?
You have correctly described the infatuation many elite Jewish young
people have with Eastern cults. Some of our best young men and women
have been drawn, not to the fatuous Jews for Jesus, but to the more
distant, and to them more profound, spirituality of the Orient, I have
inereasingly heard from some of these devotees, however, who, having
tasted of mystic exotica, now are eager to blend their new experience
with their own native tradition. They have not been helped much by a
Jewish community whose priorities are in buildings and overseas
projects rather than in the religious inspiration of their own young.
Still, at least one of the young men I know, now studying meditation in
a foreign ashram, wrote me recently:
"Would you please send one of those booklets for the Passover
service? I think I would like to celebrate it this year and it will not
be possible to get to a synagogue in the area. ... As you know I have
felt, even after leaving my atheist stage, that Judaism was somehow
dominated by the fierce father God of the Old Testament, but I am now
seeing beyond this to the essential closeness to the source which
permeates the religion and is expressed particularly in a festival such
as Passover, a festival of death and renewal, of freedom and duty. I
learn very slowly how muck of my rejected past I must reaccept, and how
good and right it is that I do so."
He may be a more typical returning Jew than we have come to
expect. In any case, he will bring new insights and new demands to his
own people. I hope we can begin to confront both.
ARNOLD JACOB WOLF
Chaplain and Direetor,
B'nai B'rith Hillel Foundation
at Yale University
New Haven
Back to the source
The "knowledge" that Guru Maharaj ji is freely revealing to all who
ask is a practical method for us as human beings to realize the source
of our own lives. This source, which some call God, manifests itself in
Divine Light and overwhelming waves of love, bliss, and peace. That is
why the guru business is booming. Salutations at the lotus feat of Guru
MaharaJ ji.
KENNETH FISHER
Rochester
Whose reality?
I remember having heard so many times in the past, "You only see
what you want to see." It appears to me, dear editor, that Khushwant
Singh only saw what he wanted and at the same time had both eyes
closed. To a blind man, the light of the sun does not exist, but in
reality, does it not shine ever so brightly? Similarly, to a person
perceiving only from his two carnal eyes and from the mind, Shri Guru
Maharaj ji is a plump 15-year-o1d Indian boy. But to those fortunate
souls to whom has been revealed the Divine "third eye," he is a light
brighter than ten thousand suns.
Here is one human being perceived by two other human beings, but which is the one real reality?
STEVEN A. KANE
Brooklyn, N. Y.
