>is your focus on helping those who are still stuck to the "Lotus feets" to examine their position, or is it just to mock it?<

Not sure if I qualify as an 'old ex' yet (is there a pension ?) Over the three years I've been posting on the ex forums I've become progessively less optimistic about the possibility of 'dialogue' between remaining  premies and exs - at least in the public domain. This is despite a great effort on  'our' part to make the forums a place in which fair discussion can take place.

Not a single pro Rawat poster who has come to F8 in the last year has made the slightest effort to engage with ex arguments. Without some attempt from 'the other side' to do things differently there is no chance of any 'help being given to those who are still stuck' - except perhaps that the arguments, comments, observations and statements made here, may be read by those who are questioning their addiction to Rawat.

There is another aspect, exs, if they have any duty to 'help' may actually owe that duty to a wider audience than current 'premies' - who at one level could be considered a lost cause. Perhaps we should be more concerned with the next generation of potential Rawat dupes - and in demonstrating the foolishness of becoming a Rawat drudge - mockery may well be a valuable tool.

Personally as long as folks stick to the forum rules I don't think there can or should be any limits on how people express themselves.

N