It's obvious that the cult responds there to what is said here and that's how I see most of those faq's, including that one. Why else would the question even be brought up?  It's like Nixon talk -- another non-denial denial.

Notice that they don't deny the accusation made here that Rawat creates a dependency upon him, but say "it's voluntary."  No.  Not just voluntary but "purely voluntary."

All the words the cult uses count and mean something specific with a purpose.

There are no rules to follow, no organisations to join, and no membership fees to pay.

That's the statement that lead me to my opinion yesterday that the Event Team website is deceptive.  "No rules (procedures) to follow...No organizations...purely voluntary..." Of course.  No smoking gun, but another log for the pyre.