They were just spreadsheets as to who lent how much and blah, blah, blah.

They revealed no crime whatsoever.  Thus, the theft of the documents could not be considered as any kind of protected whistleblowing in court.

And I heard all sorts of bullshit about trading while insolvent that was supposed to mean something.  It didn't.  The documents were non-events and meant nothing other than how much debt Amaroo had been financed by wealthy premies.  And there are no laws preventing private lending amongst individuals.  Sorry!