There is nothing in these documents to justify EV's actions (against MacGregor), which is clear evidence of vindictiveness.

I agree. Those documents might corroborate future evidence on Rawat's non-profit tax status, but, by and large, they are innocuous. It represents another example to add to the heap about how petty Rawat can be. What is going to do now, repeat the pie incident and send some mahatma goons with baseball bats to Thailand?

It's funny: working in the architecture business, I understand some of the language in the first document. It sure sounds like M runs a tight ship when it comes to the design process. I would not want to be the sorry architect who has to explain a change order or cost overrun to Rawat. For a man who pretends to know about peace, I'll bet he has melted more than a few architects!