One specific error of yours

One specific error of yours
Re: You're making the same mistake you always make -- 13	Top of thread	Post Reply	Forum

Posted by:
Jim ^Ž

12/26/2016, 18:26:27
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin

Post Reply

Your speculation as to why the Germans didn't disseminate the attacker's picture is wrong. As this article and the enclosed German media link prove, it was to avoid inciting "racial hatred":

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/12/german-pol-prevented-cops-from-publishing-pics-of-berlin-jihadi-during-manhunt-for-fear-of-inciting-racial-hatred

In other words, they most definitely put civilizans at further risk and hamstrung the effort to find and arrest or kill him to serve some outrageous politically correct madness.

Hey, it worked out in the end. Amri didn't kill anyone else and was eventually found. But it could have gone differently and quite possibly because of this outrageous decision. You can see how your wishful thinking goes nowhere. Isn't it time for you to readjust your coordinates? How often do you have to miss stuff before you do a full course correction?

Modified by Jim at Mon, Dec 26, 2016, 18:55:03

Current page

Replies to this message

Re: One specific error of yours --- 13 ( Tue, Dec 27, 2016, 01:15:13 ) ( 367 bytes ) +2

Oh wow ... --- Jim ( Tue, Dec 27, 2016, 08:21:39 ) ( 323 bytes )
You are 100 percent wrong on the facts! --- Jim ( Tue, Dec 27, 2016, 08:38:53 ) ( 915 bytes )

This is incorrect --- aunt bea ( Tue, Dec 27, 2016, 09:26:21 ) ( 1097 bytes ) +2

Re: This is incorrect --- Jim ( Tue, Dec 27, 2016, 10:00:23 ) ( 191 bytes ) +1

Even that is wrong --- aunt bea ( Tue, Dec 27, 2016, 11:25:14 ) ( 675 bytes ) +1

You are in denial --- Jim ( Tue, Dec 27, 2016, 12:09:21 ) ( 265 bytes )

Even Der Spiegel admits that "calm and stoic" is insane --- Jim ( Tue, Dec 27, 2016, 10:07:55 ) ( 224 bytes ) link +3

Also wrong, but that should be obvious to anyone. (nt) --- aunt bea ( Tue, Dec 27, 2016, 11:26:14 ) ( 2 bytes ) +1

How? He keeps saying there must be something wrong with him --- Jim ( Tue, Dec 27, 2016, 12:02:55 ) ( 9 bytes ) +1

Here's what I find wrong --- PatD ( Tue, Dec 27, 2016, 13:05:16 ) ( 849 bytes ) +1

Re: Here's what I find wrong --- Jim ( Tue, Dec 27, 2016, 14:54:37 ) ( 206 bytes ) +1

Re: Here's what I find wrong --- PatD ( Tue, Dec 27, 2016, 17:41:54 ) ( 459 bytes )

Der Spiegel in denial and Obama gone rogue --- Jim ( Wed, Dec 28, 2016, 09:48:26 ) ( 1787 bytes ) +1

Obama gone rogue --- auggie55 ( Wed, Dec 28, 2016, 10:33:40 ) ( 465 bytes ) +1

"Israel apartheid" = leftist poison slime jargon --- Jim ( Wed, Dec 28, 2016, 13:59:26 ) ( 66 bytes ) +1

Re: "Israel apartheid" = leftist poison slime jargon --- auggie55 ( Wed, Dec 28, 2016, 14:09:40 ) ( 453 bytes ) +1

British heat --- Jim ( Thu, Dec 29, 2016, 08:52:41 ) ( 296 bytes ) link +2

Re: British heat --- auggie55 ( Thu, Dec 29, 2016, 10:53:29 ) ( 65 bytes ) +1

Re: British heat --- Jim ( Thu, Dec 29, 2016, 10:59:43 ) ( 427 bytes ) +1

Re: British heat --- auggie55 ( Thu, Dec 29, 2016, 11:45:48 ) ( 785 bytes ) +1

Re: Sanity here --- auggie55 ( Thu, Dec 29, 2016, 12:12:25 ) ( 438 bytes )

Theresa May --- PatD ( Thu, Dec 29, 2016, 22:08:10 ) ( 1768 bytes ) +1

Fuck! --- Jim ( Fri, Dec 30, 2016, 08:12:01 ) ( 1273 bytes ) +1

Nooooo --- PatD ( Sat, Dec 31, 2016, 21:13:17 ) ( 82 bytes ) img +1

OMG, you're mocking me! --- Jim ( Sun, Jan 01, 2017, 09:42:04 ) ( 154 bytes ) +1

Happy New Year Jim.... --- PatD ( Sun, Jan 01, 2017, 11:59:11 ) ( 390 bytes ) img +1

BTW --- PatD ( Sun, Jan 01, 2017, 12:27:57 ) ( 107 bytes ) +1

Re: BTW --- Jim ( Sun, Jan 01, 2017, 13:55:30 ) ( 483 bytes )

well I read that article Jim --- lesley ( Wed, Dec 28, 2016, 16:14:08 ) ( 669 bytes ) img +1

Re: well I read that article Jim --- Jim ( Thu, Dec 29, 2016, 07:04:22 ) ( 687 bytes ) +1

I thought afterwards of the right word - not stoic, phlegmatic --- lesley ( Fri, Dec 30, 2016, 10:08:23 ) ( 1019 bytes ) img +1

Lesley, that's a ridiculous analogy --- Jim ( Sat, Dec 31, 2016, 09:41:01 ) ( 530 bytes ) +2

No, Jim --- lesley ( Sat, Dec 31, 2016, 14:48:58 ) ( 290 bytes ) +1

The only reason for sang froid is other people's worry --- Jim ( Sat, Dec 31, 2016, 18:49:11 ) ( 298 bytes ) +1

Re: The only reason for sang froid is other people's worry --- lesley ( Sun, Jan 01, 2017, 14:18:41 ) ( 2089 bytes ) +3

Re: Miss 13 too.(no text) --- auggie55 ( Sun, Jan 01, 2017, 16:00:34 ) ( 2 bytes )
You lost me --- Jim ( Tue, Jan 03, 2017, 08:57:58 ) ( 116 bytes )
You lost me - (disregard duplicate) --- Jim ( Tue, Jan 03, 2017, 08:58:55 ) ( 118 bytes ) +1

thanks Jim, but I think we've moved on --- lesley ( Tue, Jan 03, 2017, 14:33:26 ) ( 469 bytes ) +1

Once again, that's ridiculous --- Jim ( Wed, Jan 04, 2017, 09:10:33 ) ( 506 bytes ) +1

lordy, Jim --- lesley ( Wed, Jan 04, 2017, 12:34:18 ) ( 772 bytes ) +1

You're missing something critical --- Jim ( Wed, Jan 04, 2017, 12:49:58 ) ( 340 bytes )

and it's not a ridiculous analogy --- lesley ( Sat, Dec 31, 2016, 15:15:48 ) ( 504 bytes ) img