New Post

Reload

Overview
 
Chat
NewestArchive
Login
 
Admin
A new post from the new voice!
  Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
roark ®

05/06/2017, 11:56:13
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply

Hello,

In my last post I
commented on the repetitive nature of Forum content, but we may actually break
some new ground here (and I apologize for never being able to get the dang
formatting to look right after cutting / pasting).  My friend has asked me to post the following:

 

I've seen some of the responses to
my message that Mike posted here.

I must admit that I was stunned by
the venomous words I have seen, especially from people who literally have no
idea of what they are talking about.  You are certainly entitled to your
opinion, and it doesn’t surprise me that so much about GMJ deserves condemnation.
 But truthfully, while you are entitled to your opinion, you are not
entitled to disrespect people whose experience you don’t know anything about or
to try to cause hurt through your words.  I’m talking less about me, but
about the many good people on this site who must put up with the words of
hatred.  You can share what you observed and how you reacted to that.
 But if you attempt to say what I experienced, said or did; if you insult
me out of what I can only see as ignorance and ill will, I am going to stop
you.


Admittedly, I know little about this site.  Perhaps it is meant to be a
vehicle for people to get out what haunts them.  I can only hope that
serves you.  However, if I continue to see people post hurtful language,
largely coming from ignorance and, although I don’t know, I can only assume,
some need to express anger, I will stop you.   I have made a
commitment in my life to stand up to violence, be it through actions or words,
as best as I can.  If anything, that commitment was only further nourished
by my experience with GMJ.  I may not be able to stop ISIS terrorists from
cutting off heads, but I can stop those of you who are striking out and hurting
people.  If you doubt my ability to do so, you don’t know me.  So,
test me.  Continue to speak hurtful words.  I truly invite you to.
 I haven’t had such a wonderful opportunity put in front of me in a long, long
time.




If you chose to criticize my comments that criticize your comments that
criticize my comments, you will play that game on your own.  I seek ways
for us to connect and find true commonality.  If anyone
chooses, I will
authorize Mike to share my phone number with any one of you, although I don’t
know how that would work logistically.  I don’t want there to be those who
are right and those who are wrong.  What does that do for us, as
individuals, or as people seeking a way to create a more livable world.
 My life is truly very busy, but if I can support someone, in any way,
that is important to me.




So, if you think I am off the wall, deluded or dangerous, let’s talk.
 Hopefully, we would both come away from our conversation having learned
something.  In any case, it may well be a hell of a conversation!




In the meantime, perhaps what I share below about what my life was like with
GMJ in the 1970s, may help provide a context in which to see what occurred from
a different perspective. You may already be well aware of what I will share, in
which case, I apologize for taking up your time.  But if you are not, I
hope you find some value in it.  




When I became involved with GMJ in 1971, I was in my early 20s; and I literally
joined the Hindu religion.  Any actions of those days need to be seen in
that context. And any relationship I had in those early years with GMJ can only
be understood in that context.  




It might be that Hinduism is a religion you abhor, but many, many hundreds of
millions of people have traveled that path.  Certainly, within Hinduism,
there are and have been gurus, teachers, masters - whatever you call them - who
have exhibited great care, compassion and wisdom.  But also there are
countless examples of gurus throughout history who literally led armies of
their followers to slaughter many people.  This isn’t intended as a
history lesson.  You can explore that further if it is useful to you.
 But I would also remind you that many similar acts were carried out in
the name of Christianity (not to say that somehow justifies them).




To be clear from the outset, I am certainly not an expert in Hinduism, but I
can only share what I do know.  Core to Hinduism is the surrender, let me
repeat that word - the surrender – of one’s life to a guru.  That is not
seen as a task.  It is the most astounding gift from, well, whomever it
was supposed to be a gift from.  Many, many people, even in recent times,
have searched and prayed that a guru would be revealed to them.  You see,
a guru was not seen as a person, but the manifestation of god in our world. In
that sense, how a guru lived or acted was inconsequential. As god’s manifestation,
a guru was seen as being beyond any definitions we might apply to other people.
I am not saying that is right, but only sharing what I learned over decades of
immersion in that practice.  




In that religion, the incomprehensible glorious gift, beyond what any human
being has the right to expect, is that a guru offers the opportunity - even
more - the very purpose of life. By completely and utterly surrendering your
life to a guru's will and guidance, god is showing you his (or her) endless and
supreme grace - to know him, to serve him, to love him.  




Buying GMJ fleets of cars, airplanes (and even pot) wasn’t evaluated in the
terms that we, as modern and hopefully reasonable people, can understand.
 It was seen in the light of an entire perspective of reality.  It
was more than an honor or a gift, it was a grace of an all-loving god being
offered.  You might reasonably ask how this gift of love can cause harm to
so many.  Well, eventually, I could no longer avoid that very question and
had to act on it.  But I do offer the fact that even today countless
people consider that surrender to a guru to be the ultimate gift offered to
them.

I kissed his feet!  Can you
believe that?  And more than once - a lot more.  There are millions
of people who would say that I was blessed beyond comprehension to have had
that chance.  There are literally hundreds of thousands of people - right
now - who walk for weeks just to be in their guru’s presence, sometimes standing
so far back in the crowd that they can't even see him.  That I could kiss
his feet - unbelievable!  If that sickens you - well, you might consider
how that rings of bigotry.  You can chose not to do what I did, but you
can’t cast derision on someone whose religious practices are different than
your beliefs.  That kind of small-mindedness has led to the useless
slaughter of millions over centuries.  When do we break that cycle?


Was I a fool to accept that path?  I did not feel so at the time, after
years and years of spiritual seeking.  I was not an idiot.  I was not
tricked.  I found an experience that I had longed for.  Whether it is
a way you would want or even fathom that you could take is up to you.  But
I encourage you not to dismiss it because you did not experience it or know
what is was - both in the moment it was occurring and as a profound, ancient
and honored religion.


Very important in understanding what I shared on this forum was the experience
I had.  First, I meditated two to four hours a day for more than a decade.
That’s a hell of a lot of meditation. I can never explain what that experience
was, other than to say that it still provides me with a great well of love and
understanding, nearly 50 years later.  I spoke to crowds of 40,000 people
and felt such profound love moving through me that I could not deny it.



The experience I had in serving GMJ was so exquisite that I still try to
experience it in the work and the life I now have – not through surrender to a
guru, but by knowing that I still exist to serve; now I would say to serve humanity
and all those I touch.  I no longer think of it as serving god or a guru,
but I certainly understand that many, many people still see their lives from
that perspective.



I awoke every morning at 4 AM and sang “arti” in Hindi - a chant in honor of the
guru, waving a golden plate holding a candle of ghee (purified butter) before
his picture.  Believe it to not, I can still sing that goddam song in
Hindi - more than 50 years later.  Then I sat for two hours in mediation.
 Then I got up and did my service all day.  And then, every night, I
mean I missed not more than 10 nights in 15 years, gathering to tell of our
experiences, stories of the great “perfect masters,” celebrate god- satsang.
 Then it was back to meditating for a few hours.  For 14 years!
 Poverty, chastity and obedience!  I lived the life that every Hindu
ashram resident had lived for many hundreds of years.  And if you think
that was a bad life, well, I guess you’re entitled to your opinion. My
time with GMJ was a total immersion and one that I will never regret.  


At the same time that I describe what my days were like, I am fully aware that
it was a classical example of brain-washing.  No doubt about it.  But
don't monks live like that?  And not to get too far off the deep end
philosophically, if I haven’t already, isn’t every culture a cult?  We
define our accepted behaviors, we reinforce them all the time, we tell our
stories (TV, Facebook), use our special language and receive the gifts from the
dedication to our practice.  Sounds like a Wall Street broker might fit
that description, too.  



But it changed for us, even back in the ashram days.  We moved from the
yoga whites phase to the suits from Goodwill phase to the suits from Brooks
Brothers phase.  GMJ was, it seemed, trying to relate to the world he was
discovering that didn’t have much to so with his Prem Nagar ashram on the
Ganges (where I stayed for 6 months) or the Ram Lila Grounds in Delhi, where he
would speak to a million people.  I’m not exaggerating.  I was there.
 There was this 12 year old kid holding the rapt attention of a million
people.  What the he’ll was that?  I don’t know and truly, I no
longer care.  There are lots of things I don’t know about - whether we
come back after we die, whether Jesus will return for the rapture.  I
can’t say those things are not true or that they are.  But I can know what
road I chose to follow each day.



It was an absolutely wild time; but in many ways, it was an absolutely wild
times throughout America- the 70s.  And, mostly, it was great joy.  I
don’t know if that joy came from my devout practice of a religion, any
religion, or if it was from his grace.  I have to tell you, for a long
time I not only believed, but I knew it was by his grace.  I have no idea
what to say about all that.  Only, that as our lifestyle changed, the
meanness of the man became much harder for me to dismiss.



I wish I had some words to sum it up.  But like in life, our experience in
every moment, be it meditating or taking a shower, is beyond the mind’s
understanding.  Our minds create concepts - packages or units it parcels
out to deal with what it experiences, because it cannot see the whole. The
classic example is that the mind thinks when we get ill, there’s something
wrong with our body.  It is not too “out there” these days to recognize
that we are one whole - body, mind, emotions, spirit.   Does our mind
know reality?  I doubt it.  It seems to me that it’s operating within
the limitations of our brains, and ends up creating a world view of separation
and limitation.  



The sad part to me comes when our limited minds, overwhelmed with delusions and
frightened to live in the true unknown that life is, strike out - in anger,
confusion and pain; and with that, cause so much suffering to others.  One
thing that GMJ used to say that I still have no doubt about is that too often
we actually not only listen to all our mind’s concepts, but believe them and
act upon them.  Of course, life calls out for action.  But when that
action is steeped in humility, with a sense of our common humanity, and in
seeing the wonder of each day, life can be transformed.



I think the hope, the dream of all spiritual roads is to experience, glimpse,
connect with reality beyond our minds - God? String theory? The return to glory
of my New York Yankees?  I no longer know, and I no longer care.
 Maybe I should.  I do know each moment what choice is available to
me and as much as I can, I chose to open to love.



But the point I want to make is that I had an - I don’t know what words to put
on it - extraordinary, overflowing with love, an unquestionable connection to
the meaning of my life.  It was an amazing experience.  I am not
using that to justify anything, but only to share my experience.  I have
no idea of what it’s like with Prem Rawat now, or what it's been for 30 years.
 Truly, no idea.  And the question just doesn’t come up for me.  


I encourage you to consider that not everyone sees the world as we do. I
understand and respect their right to do so.  However, in saying that, I still
draw my boundaries that I will absolutely not step beyond.  As I brought
up above, one could say that ISIS has another world view.  Who’s to say
they don’t have the right to it.  Well, in my heart and in my mind, I say
they do not have the right to.  To slaughter, enslave and cause
unimaginable suffering to those who do not accept their views - I stand up and
say, I do not accept your right to do so, and I will stop you.



You might view what I did in a similar light.  When I say I caused harm to
others, perhaps I can explain better what I meant.  One example was that
when GMJ needed skilled labor from around the country to work on his airplane,
whether they were ashram residents or married with families, I encouraged them
to come to “serve.”  Did I understand then that it was wrong to cause
families to separate, even temporarily, whether in the name of a guru or not?
  I did not.  I did not have that level of awareness then.
 



I like to think that my awareness has grown. I do my best to live my life from
the greatest sense of awareness, care and love I can find within myself.
 Did I know I was causing harm then and overlook it because I was directed
by GMJ?  Honestly, no.  That is why that I look back at my actions of
those times with chagrin.



Was I a blind fool to see things that way then?  I truly don’t know.
 Did I think that buying pot for my 13 year old guru was an odious act?
 At that time, I did not.  Was I a fool?  Maybe.  But more
directly, I was a servant of my guru.  Even back then, the question would
come up, “Would you kill if GMJ told you to?”  Not for one instant was I
unclear about that.  I would not cross the boundaries of my values; even
if my values might not have been as clearly formed then as they are now.



Over time, I could no longer deny or explain away what I saw him doing, and how
he lived his own life, and knew I had to draw my line.  There are
countless stories, for example, one being of a guru wandering the streets, dead
drunk, with two “women of the night” in his arms, and nearly everyone
shuttering their windows in disgust.  But the lesson offered was that only
the true devotee could recognize a guru.  Certainly I am no longer willing
to accept that idea, but the truth is that many, many people still do.
 Clearly, that is changing rapidly as western values permeate the world.
 But don’t think for a moment that that perspective no longer exists.

I offer the thought that if you
think my ashram life with GMJ was terrible – well, I’d chose it over working 60
hours a week to afford that fourth TV to put in the bathroom, so you don’t
miss…well, whatever you think you’re missing.  And it sure beats being so
stressed out that you don’t even notice how many shades of green there are in
the tree overhead.  Yeah, we can communicate a hundred times faster; but
what are we communicating?  Ever read those texts and tweets kids are
sending out these days, their heads buried so deep in the latest iPhone that
they don’t even know what’s going on around them, much less participating in
it?  I’m not longing for the good old days.  But I am longing for a
sense of family and community that is so much more important.  It’s not
the times or the technology that makes life good.  It’s the connection we
can have to each other, to nature and to it all.  Maybe some of you should
save your anger for your own life and don’t go pontificating about how terrible
others are. 

I’m not promoting the ashram or
GMJ's lifestyle anymore.  I stopped living it 35 years ago.  But I
had that experience and I knew what I was choosing to walk away
from.  And I’m not blaming someone else for my experience.  I’m
taking responsibility for my own life.  Each day, I have the choice to
experience depression, anger, stress and frustration or to experience love.  That’s
a choice I make day to day, minute to minute.


Am I a coward to look back after all
these years and lament what I did?  I don’t know and I don’t find value in
ruminating over that.  I saw that I could no longer follow that path and I
made a change.  I guess you have every right to judge me however you wish,
but you do not have the right to spew venom as a sign of your disapproval.
 You can ask, how can I possibly be at peace with those actions.  In
truth, I have spent many decades learning and hopefully, growing.  I do my
best each day to live by my deepest values.  As most of you know, I would
assume, life is a journey we walk each moment.



I am not sorry for that part of my life.  If someone came to me today and
asked if I thought they should become a Hindu, I would not discourage them; but
only encourage them to know from the depth of their being that they are
choosing to follow the teacher they are truly meant to.



I feel lucky to have found a strength within to see what I truly value and to
make the effort to live by it.  I hope I share that with each of you.
 



I greatly apologize for all my preaching and for my expression of anger.
 But I am not sorry for responding with anger to what I see as hurtful
words.  I would see them the same way even if they didn’t demonstrate
ignorance.   If it isn’t already obvious to you, I claim no sainthood
for myself.  I’m just living my life, like you, trying to know and walk my
truth every day.






Modified by roark at Sat, May 06, 2017, 12:12:04

Previous View All Current page Next
Re: A new post from the new voice!
Re: A new post from the new voice! -- roark Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
swimming free ®

05/06/2017, 12:29:18
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply
After reading your post,I had to go back and reread the thread that resulted from your previous post.  I didn't find the venom that you referred to.  Perhaps I am missing something.  Can you please point out specifically those posts or portions of posts that you find offensive.  Thanks.






Previous Current page Next
Ditto!
Re: Re: A new post from the new voice! -- swimming free Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
Genny ®

05/06/2017, 13:56:40
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply
Me too...kept wondering, 'what venom?'...I found the whole thread lovely and fascinating...a free flow of such varying feelings, which is why this site is so awesome!  I must of missed something...but generally I adore the freedom to fight and make up and question and answer here...so much compassion behind all of it.

I kept thinking...'new voice' will be fine, they just need to read more Journeys and a few more forum discussions to see that there was no attack...just questions!

I personally know of several ex-premies who seem to be doing well now, and I'm constantly amazed and delighted by the wellness of my EPO friends...but I remain in a place where I need to hate the guru and I appreciate hearing about what a dick he is...so thanks!!

Keep coming..keep arguing..keep makin up,
G






Previous Current page Next
Quick observations
Re: Re: A new post from the new voice! -- swimming free Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
roark ®

05/06/2017, 14:47:25
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply

Hi Swimming Free,

You questioned New Voice on why he would feel
there was ‘venom’ or offensiveness within some of the responses to what he
wrote.
  Venom is a pretty strong word, and I share your question and value your approach to
dialogue.
 

I know that when I read several of the responses to
his first post, I felt a little bad, and I can see why New Voice would feel
defensive, and I’m now questioning whether I should have asked him if I could
post his snippet (written to me in the context of our own communication) in the
first place.

For clarity I am not speaking for him, only for myself, but please carefully
read these quoted responses, and please let me know if you feel that adequate civility
and respect for his veracity and perspective is being extended to someone that
that is coming to this Forum for the first time:

 

Rawatcher: posted "I was pimping for him
when he was 13. I was buying him booze and dope even earlier." Rawat
turned 13 on December 10, 1970 and arrived in the West on June 17,1971. Our
informant has probably mistaken the age and dates. Could he really have been
supplying Rawat with alcohol in India? Prostitutes? Rawat spent 1 month in
England and then flew to USA and returned to India in November? Could he really
have been supplying Rawat with alcohol and dope during this time? Prostitutes?
Is he talking about Marolyn Johnson when he refers to pimping?

13 wrote: “So long as you never
have to think about the people you were complicit in harming, you can go on
feeling comfortable in yourself. Charming.

Manincar wrote: “That's a lot of complicity
just hanging around waiting to be let off the hook. I guess I would have to say
"step up and take some responsibility"

13 wrote: “It's hard to forgive
someone else's complicity when they seem to express no regret themselves, nor
acknowledge the harm caused with their assistance. Just shrugging it off and
never thinking about it doesn't cut it for me.

Swimming Free wrote: “If you truly were the vehicle for him to create much suffering in
people's lives, then I am surprised that you give Rawat such a free pass and
that you don't feel worse about the whole issue of your involvement with Rawat.”
 

Lesley wrote: “Of course he was tricked,
trapped and cajoled, as he says earlier up the page, neatly parcelling it as
part of the human lot.  And he was heavily manipulated.  But now he
knows, it's his choice to stay?  Doesn't change a thing about what's
happened in the past and at that point in time, it's ongoing.

Lexy wrote (to
me):
“In the
past, your own posts have sparked a similar reaction in me. I felt that you and
your friend must have encouraged each others denial of the negative side of
premiedom.

Then today
13 wrote:
Discussions have
occasionally morphed into arguments here, but in the many years I've been
reading here, no-one but people still deluded about Rawat (premies, pwk's) have
issued threats.
” 
FYI, I interpreted New Voices’ “I will stop you” to say he will try to convince you otherwise,
even offering to communicate in person over the phone towards that end, not as
a “threat”.  And in just a few sentences, 13 effectively
called him a person
still deluded about Rawat”, telling
him apparently cannot be “full of love”, that
he is sees from his “high horse” and considers
himself to be superior, not regarding others on the Forum as “equals”. 

And Jim posted: I guess a lifetime spent as a lackey to a cult leader will do
a number on one's instincts. The threats are outrageous though. Not to mention
the ISIS comparisons. I wonder how he thinks people will warm up to him and
respectfully consider his past reflections when he peppers them with those kinds
of insults and warnings. Dude, I'm embarrassed for you. No one's going to want
to talk with you unless and until you retract them.”
which speaks for itself

 

I mean I
get the Forum venue format, where things can be batted around freely, love it. 

But is
it just me, or possibly do you also sense any unnecessary questions of integrity,
sarcasm, insults, presumption, snap-judgement and/or disrespect for what he expressed on his
first post (without further questioning and verification) that could influence his
second post?

M






Modified by roark at Sat, May 06, 2017, 15:11:06

Previous Current page Next
Re: Quick observations
Re: Quick observations -- roark Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
13 ®

05/06/2017, 15:25:43
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply
 Here's a quote for you Mike:

I may not be able to stop ISIS terrorists from 
cutting off heads, but I can stop those of you who are striking out and hurting 
people.  If you doubt my ability to do so, you don’t know me.
(What is this? An ex premie come with more power than before? Who did he merge with, Vishnu? It would be sinister if it wasn't comical).

  So, 
test me.  Continue to speak hurtful words.  I truly invite you to. 
 I haven’t had such a wonderful opportunity put in front of me in a long, long 
time.


That sounds like a man looking forward to a fight, hinting he's enjoyed such confrontations before.

Mike, I suggest you stop acting as this fellow's proxy. He can register with jhb to post here for himself if he's hard enough.






Previous Current page Next
Re: Quick observations
Re: Re: Quick observations -- 13 Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
roark ®

05/06/2017, 15:55:15
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply

Hey 13,

I believe it was actually Shiva /ex-premie coming
with more power than ever before, LOL (good one!)

You are free to suggest I suppose, but he
informed me a while ago that he is trying to sign up for the site, but hit a technical snag and is awaiting the blessed benediction of jhb most high into the vaulted temple of the Forum (where he
will be summarily torn to shreds) and where all things get clarified, resolved
and enlightened.

We’ll see if he is hard enough.  I think he has an interesting perspective and unique history.

But if you are too awful tough on him, I may have
to come there and kick your ass (provided your are a dude, and then Heller’s too for
good measure and fun).

Best, Mike








Previous Current page Next
Here's a better idea
Re: Quick observations -- roark Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
Jim ®

05/06/2017, 15:52:45
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply

Buddy apologizes for the threats and insults. He then wades into the murky but safe enough waters of deconstructing the past. Because that's what this is all about, isn't it? So he takes some flak for playing a more active role in the deception than others. Many if not most of us would have too given the chance. It was a cult after all.   But the over-amped sensitivity is uncalled for. You know that. 





Modified by Jim at Sat, May 06, 2017, 15:53:47

Previous Current page Next
Re: Here's a better idea
Re: Here's a better idea -- Jim Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
roark ®

05/06/2017, 15:58:19
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply
Yes, I see.  And it will be more fun if he is not in deposition mode.






Previous Current page Next
Fun for whom?
Re: Re: Here's a better idea -- roark Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
Jim ®

05/06/2017, 16:09:01
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply
Maybe more fun for him but maybe not for others. Look, lots of former PAMs avoided the forum because they didn't want to be taken to task for their roles in the subterfuge. What can you do? This is a no-stakes game now. If he can't handle a little bit of understandable grief he doesn't have to participate. But ISIS? Really? 






Previous Current page Next
Re: Fun for whom?
Re: Fun for whom? -- Jim Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
roark ®

05/06/2017, 16:25:15
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply
Yeah, I just like the idea of exchanges engendered by open minds and civility as a rule, not defensive entrenchments (and re entrenchments) engendered by unflinching worldviews and piling on.






Previous Current page Next
Re: Fun for whom?
Re: Re: Fun for whom? -- roark Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
Jim ®

05/06/2017, 16:39:14
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply
Sure. 






Previous Current page Next
Re: Quick observations
Re: Quick observations -- roark Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
swimming free ®

05/06/2017, 16:48:17
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply

Hi Mike.  I still remember my first posts on the forum and the hurt I felt from some of the responses to my first few posts.  I think that that the forum is a kinder place now than it was then, only 6 or 7 years ago.  I don't think that there was venom or even a bit of venom in my post.  

Your friend stated that he "had been the vehicle for creating much suffering" at the behest of Rawat.  I stated "if you truly have been...", which I guess could have been construed as doubting his veracity.  However, not knowing the individual, nor his specific actions, I considered that perhaps he was overly blaming himself while at the same time, I got the impression from his post that he wasn't placing the same level of blame on Rawat for having actually directed his actions.

  To me, this was like a secretary in the Madoff investment scandal acknowledging the pain that resulted from her complicity in his scam, while at the same time defending and refusing to blame the head of the scam, Madoff himself.


I felt no emotion posting my response to your friend, mostly I was just puzzled and curious.
There were several posters who were pouring some sugar on your friend as well as those you listed who were raising some valid questions for discussion.


I look forward to your friend joining the forum.  I am sure that he has much valuable insight to share.






Modified by swimming free at Sat, May 06, 2017, 16:51:42

Previous Current page Next
Re: Quick observations
Re: Re: Quick observations -- swimming free Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
roark ®

05/06/2017, 17:15:12
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply

Hi

I did not sense venom in what you posted.

He is signing on soon.  I suggested "Brainwashed Hindu" to him as a name, but I think he is going another direction.

M






Modified by roark at Sat, May 06, 2017, 17:15:46

Previous Current page Next
Re: Quick observations
Re: Re: Quick observations -- roark Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
lesley ®

05/06/2017, 19:26:14
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply
oh that is funny.  Brainwashed Hindu is good!  I called myself Lotus Eater when I first arrived.






Previous Current page Next
Re: Quick observations
Re: Quick observations -- roark Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
tarvuist ®

05/06/2017, 19:20:29
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply

Mike with your friend you've got some steamed up here, huh!  

I hesitate to trespass assuming myself perceptive enough to comment on his character (while others have dived in headfirst, or rather headless or somewhat heedless I'd say.  Yes rather insulting to him I can agree).  But...since he's ventured into this steamy public place allowing you to post his...

I liked what he wrote.  He seems to me an honorable guy.   ...although, like others have mentioned, I think he swaggers a bit too far picking a rather "two-fisted" challenge standing up against violence and hurtful words and such, and defending his own honor.  But why not.  Moreover that's simply expression of strong will and a noble attitude as he describes it, and I take it as sincere. So I believe he's beyond reproach really in announcing his antagonism against those evils.  But others react wanting to swipe a bit at his strong character, swipe back at his righteous challenge, but he sounds as though he probably can respond well to all this. 

Well, I've been occasionally wrong in the past about guys and gurus being noble and honorable, and I've also foolishly stumbled blindly into fights I thought honorable.

Anyway I thought it an excellent and intelligent summary he wrote of the sources, the times, the culture and mental ambiances of those days, and forthcoming of his own experiences and present attitude. Maybe one of the best I've read of anything like that, in his post #2.  ...certainly coinciding and resonating with me from memory in '72 at least, and times onward.

Inculpating Discosure: I should say I was also one engaged rather early on, and way thoroughly, and ultimately had some positions somewhat of
status or responsibility in it all so maybe I'd be thought to be merely defending or forgiving him and thereby myself of all that.  Don't worry, for some reason St. Peter may refuse me at the gates and justice
will be served...if he's stlll keeping the keys by then...or maybe it's the great Tarvu holding the keys, a bit more forgiving.







Modified by tarvuist at Sat, May 06, 2017, 19:31:12

Previous Current page Next
hmmpff
Re: Quick observations -- roark Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
lesley ®

05/06/2017, 19:55:52
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply
I fail to see what is offensive let alone venomous in that quote from my post.

The main thrust of the post is questioning just how much of a choice he really had at the time.

no offence intended.






Previous Current page Next
No need for the melodrama and threats.
Re: A new post from the new voice! -- roark Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
13 ®

05/06/2017, 12:41:55
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply
You really don't know much about this forum. You might have had the courtesy to become familiar with it first. It's a discussion forum. People air their experiences and views, and others respond. If you take issue with a response, say why as clearly as you can. Don't just issue some vague threat to 'stop' people.

Discussions have occasionally morphed into arguments here, but in the many years I've been reading here, no-one but people still deluded about Rawat (premies, pwk's) have issued threats.

If you're so full of love, you should find it easy to dismount from your high horse and discuss things with the rest of us as equals. 






Previous Current page Next
Not one but two comparisons of ex-premies and ISIS - I can see clearly now!
Re: A new post from the new voice! -- roark Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
Jim ®

05/06/2017, 13:47:25
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply
This guy sounds earnest, defensive and all over the place. I guess a lifetime spent as a lackey to a cult leader will do a number on one's instincts. The threats are outrageous though. Not to mention the ISIS comparisons. I wonder how he thinks people will warm up to him and respectfully consider his past reflections when he peppers them with those kinds of insults and warnings. Dude, I'm embarrassed for you. No one's going to want to talk with you unless and until you retract them. 










Previous Current page Next
Hi New Voice
Re: A new post from the new voice! -- roark Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
lesley ®

05/06/2017, 15:04:33
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply
It's entirely normal to have an angry and defensive emotional response when your soft spots are questioned.  Considering that was an angry response I thought it rather good, lots of reasoning going on.

But, it is a forum, and I do have some things I'd like to say in response.

point a - the people going round hurting other people are largely Not people lashing out in pain, that is minor compared to all the hurt that is being dished out - it's people with nasty natures who are doing most of it and they seem to enjoy it.

point b  oh well probably I will ramble on from here - the profound experience that comes with the surrender of your life to a guru.  You really are standing on high here, as if you don't think any of us stood on our own hills, of course we did.

Really, that is the crux of the conversation here - as I exited the cult that is what I wanted to understand.  What I'd experienced.

To me that is the real cruelty of religion - sticks it's oar into the profoundly personal heart of us.

In my imagination of paradise lost there is no religion no earnestly misguided priests dispensing bad advice and no charlatan messiahs screwing you over.  There's no dishonesty and love rules. 

 










Previous Current page Next
Hello NewVoice
Re: A new post from the new voice! -- roark Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
karenl ®

05/06/2017, 16:32:58
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply
I like others would like to see you register so there is no middle person between yourself and the posters.

Many of the people on this Forum (active or lurkers) were long time ashram premies, or deep into service at DECA or the Rez. Your descriptions of ashram life are similar to my own. The Bhakti, the Bliss, the SURRENDER, the foot kissing and etc. Many in the Forum share that history with you. I find it a little odd that a: your tone is that you were the only one to experience that, and b: that you are adopting a defensive posture to those here in the Forum.

While I welcome your voice, and I heartily welcome a lively debate, (there are times it gets a little boring here) I feel you are coming off a little preachy and superior here. Get to know us a little. You will find there is a LOT of kindness and compassion in this group!

If you want to see FIREWORKS and arguments go back a few years and read when premies would post here. Anyone remember Jonk?

So when did you ex-out? What were some of the "drips" that led you to leave? What were some of your hardest issues to process?

I was in the ashrams from '73 - closing. I was one of the gopi girls. I worked the darshan recovery area for those that passed out after kissing the LOTU's feet (cringe). I passed out myself more than once. I set the table nightly for the ji with a plate of food and flowers. One night I polished a green apple and went out in the Berkeley night at midnight to steal flowers for the altar. When I got back the apple was GONE! Everyone in the house was long asleep! I was questioned by EVERYONE in authority to see if I was having a psychotic break . Out of that I wrote the poem about Bhilni. You probably read it. It hungon the ji's wall at the rez for a while.

I had a LOT of "mystical" (for lack of a better word) experiences. I still don't have a handle on what was "real" and what was emotionally fomented brain activity.I don't know if I ever will. 

I moved into the ashram at 20. Moved out at 30. Those 10 years stunted my emotional growth and warped my emotional state to the point that I haven't been able to have a healthy love relationship with a man. I still have the "surrender"model wrapped up with "love"and end up getting manipulated and used. Single life is OK.

Anger, yes, at times I am still VERY angry about being used by a narcissistic sociopath that I TRIED FROM THE BOTTOM OF MY BEING TO SURRENDER TO! (look everyone - no cussing, no 90 pt red bold screaming hate filled message to the ji). 

So, welcome to a family of wounded contrary misfit cats that cannot be herded in any one direction. 

I look forward  to lively conversations, sometimes perhaps heated, and continued deconstruction of the effects cult life have had on all of us. The more real we all are with each other, the more we grow out of the shadow of the ji. 

Karen Kirschbaum
Waynesville, NC USA



Bhilni's Poem

I live in a hut at the edge of a clearing
In summer the brook almost runs out
The autumn leaves are dry as I sweep the walk
Waiting for You
I didn't notice the years, but one day
The still waters showed gray hairs and a withered body
I live in the corner of this hut
The rest, O Lord, is Yours
The plums are ripening just now
And the blackberries
Again I will test them for sweetness
And set the table for You
Is it this morning?
Maybe this 
noon
When the sun is mellowing
Or as the stars poke out of that blue You make at the edge of night
Will I hear Your step?

I light a small fire, make your tea, sing Arti
Comb out my braid and offer You my meditation

One day You will come
Hot and dusty, or bitten by the wind
You will find me ready to receive You

Bhilni says, Oh foolish world
I would trade this life for no other
My heart burns a hole through the sun







Previous Current page Next
Brilliant, Lexy...
Re: Hello NewVoice -- karenl Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
cynthia ®

05/06/2017, 17:12:25
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply
I still love that poem.  I tried to live like Bhilni but I wasn't living in a simple hut at the edge of a clearing.  I was working hard for Maharaji in Hialeah, Florida.  Everyone was.  And as a gopi, I longed to kiss his feet.

Everything you wrote is what I wanted to say, but couldn't put the words together right.  So, thank you.

Cynthia










Previous Current page Next
TY nt
Re: Brilliant, Lexy... -- cynthia Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
karenl ®

05/06/2017, 17:23:08
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply







Previous Current page Next
(NT ) I wish I was that brilliant...but it wasn't me
Re: Brilliant, Lexy... -- cynthia Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
lexy ®

05/06/2017, 20:04:42
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply







Previous Current page Next
yes great post, Kelly
Re: Hello NewVoice -- karenl Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
lesley ®

05/06/2017, 19:44:37
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply
"the more real we all are with each other, the more we grow out of the shadow of the ji."

um, you might be less warped than you think, Karen - I think the issue with being manipulated and used is more to do with whether the man loves you back than changing the way you are.  At the end of the day when you partner with someone you have to be able to trust them to have your wellbeing at heart.  And there are so many tossers around! 






Previous Current page Next
Re: A new post from the new voice!
Re: A new post from the new voice! -- roark Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
cynthia ®

05/06/2017, 16:56:04
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply

New Voice,

I think it would be productive if you posted here directly.  Much of what you say pertaining to our practices in the Rawat cult are so similar to most here. 

No one was venomous nor hateful.  I was too critical of a brand new poster, you, so for that I apologize.  I did misunderstand your use of "pimp."

I adored Maharaji and did everything in my power to obey his agya.  When I was at DECA I spoke to him often on the phone and saw him everyday, when he was in town.  I thought I was the luckiest premie in the world.

You said:

I may not be able to stop ISIS terrorists from
cutting off heads, but I can stop those of you who are striking out and hurting
people.  If you doubt my ability to do so, you don’t know me.  So,
test me.  Continue to speak hurtful words.  I truly invite you to.
 I haven’t had such a wonderful opportunity put in front of me in a long, long
time.


This forum isn't a game.  No one means you harm and as far as I can see, no one harmed you.  Sign up and let's have hearty, logical, reasoned conversations.  Many folks here are smart and know a lot about Rawat, his shennagans and what it means to deconstruct Prem Rawat's belief system and religion.

You could benefit from this.  I have, tremendously.

All the best,
Cynthia

Btw, ISIS?  Really???






Modified by cynthia at Sat, May 06, 2017, 16:57:27

Previous Current page Next
This much is obvious to me, re: New voice....
Re: A new post from the new voice! -- roark Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
la-ex ®

05/06/2017, 17:07:20
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply
First of all, you have chosen to be here, at this time, for a reason. You may or may not be fully aware of what type of processing you are inviting yourself to participate in, but it's already happening, big league, as our prez would say...

Second, you've got a whole lot more going on beneath the surface than your probably realize....this is a great place to deconstruct it all, with a wide variety of hearts and minds willing to help you and be your friend in the process...

Third, if you threaten people with your supposed, but unnamed powers and taunt them to question or defy you, they will. They did.

I think you've got a whole lotta stuff going on, and perhaps you see just the top of it, kind of like the proverbial "iceberg" example...this is a great place to work it out....the time is now...be ready for the ride of your life, if you choose to continue....I've never met anyone who regretted it, in fact everyone seems grateful for EPO...






Previous Current page Next
Hinduism
Re: A new post from the new voice! -- roark Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
PatD ®

05/06/2017, 20:55:40
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply
On the subject of ignorance I'm amused that you don't understand that the Rawat religion, inherited from his father but debased by him upon immediate contact with richer people of a different culture, us, is an offshoot of Sikhism.

The Sant Mat/Rhadasoami tradition is less than 200 yrs old, is a product of the mingling of ideas from East & West current in the circumstances of British rule in C19th India, & is regarded as a kind of 'Uncle Tom' view of the world by right on Hindus both now & when the old feller was still alive.

You need to get up to speed on what people here know & don't know & have found out over many years before coming out with the ignorance label.

And by the way, you don't have a choice to avoid experiencing depression etc, not if you live in the real world rather than in some bubble.....bubbles are fragile.

Hope this helps.









Previous Current page Next
Re: Hinduism
Re: Hinduism -- PatD Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
roark ®

05/06/2017, 23:19:05
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply

Hi PatD

Are
you quite sure of your assessment regarding the origin of GMJ’s merchant-guru
family business? 

Sikhism,
founded over 500 years ago had a succession of ten gurus, became heavily based after
the death of the last guru on the book the ‘Guru Granth Sahib’, and is pretty
high-profile in northern India.  The Sant
Mat sect, founded by Hazur Swami Ji Maharaj (who was born in the early 1800’s) was
annexed to Sikhism, but heavily focused on the concept of Sat Guru and
more mystical / meditation practices. 
They had a clear succession of Sat Gurus until Sawan Singh died in 1948, then
splintered into multi-guru branches.  Sant Mat
also employed initiation into secret meditation techniques that are very similar
to ‘Knowledge’ and based on the same Bhakti / Sat Guru principles. 

I
agree that Shri Hans’ teachings pretty much mirror those of the Sant Mat gurus and some accounts tie him to Radha Soami and initiation to Sawan Singh, but Shri Hans is also thought to come out of the Avait Mat tradition (not Radha Soami).  But regardless, the encompassing culture clearly was Hinduism and his teachings also mirror identical mechanics as many Hindu sects. 

All
Indian religions essentially tie back to the four Vedas, and subsequent Vedic literature,
particularly the Upanishads and the epics (Mahabharata and the Ramayana).  The stories and lore around GMG and Shri Hans
I saw or read about were almost always core Vedic, with the Mahabharata and the Ramayana
the most often quoted sources.  I did see
some references to Guru Nanak, the first Sikh guru, but personally never saw a
reference to any Sant Mat gurus during my time.

My
own opinion is that it was quite a mash-up, and while seemingly derivative
of Radha Soami sect principles, Shri Hans' / GMJ's religion is MUCH more culturally derivative of classical
Hinduism, with emphasis on Bhakti Yoga.
  Hinduism and the Yoga
tradition have employed the same Sat Guru philosophy as Sant Mat for much, much
longer and more pervasively than Sikhism / Sant Mat.






Modified by roark at Sat, May 06, 2017, 23:27:38

Previous Current page Next
Re: Hinduism
Re: Re: Hinduism -- roark Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
cq ®

05/07/2017, 03:22:14
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply
Not too sure about that, Mike. If you get time, have a look at the linked piece on the fundamentals of Sikhism - definitely a closer match to what we were indoctrinated with than Hinduism, though Rawat used a few tales from the ancient Hindu scriptures to widen his appeal.




Related link: http://www.realsikhism.com/index.php?subaction=showfull&id=1248308356&ucat=7

Previous Current page Next
Re: Hinduism
Re: Re: Hinduism -- roark Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
rawatcher ®

05/07/2017, 14:29:26
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply
Further elucidation. You are confusing Radha Saomi/Sant Mat and other modern cults with the Sant Mat devotional and egalitarian tradition that goes back to the 13th century based on the poetry of Kabir and others. Wikipedia actually demonstrates this quite well with its page on "Sant Mat" and its separate page on "Contemporary Sant Mat movements" which basically are cults especially in the West.
Shri Hans "teachings" are similar to Radha Saomi as they're based in these same traditions but the Radha Saomi meditation techniques are quite dissimilar. Radha Soami and similar groups are usually more esoteric than Rawatism which is probably because Rawat, himself, is not an intellectual and likes to keep things simple.
Naturally Roark didn't hear respectful mention of other modern Sant Mat gurus - they were the competition and despite Foot Kisser's pleas they were judged and condemned rather nastily by Hans Rawat.
Hinduism is quite a mash up and the Upanishads/Bhagavad Gita are completely different to the Vedas which seem to be about rituals and animal sacrifices.






Previous Current page Next
Re: Hinduism
Re: Re: Hinduism -- rawatcher Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
roark ®

05/07/2017, 15:26:21
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply
Rawatcher,

Yes Sant Mat is broader than Radha Soami, and I may have interpolated them incorrectly in what I wrote.  I was actually on my way to be initiated by Charan Singh, a Radha Soami guru in the Punjab when preempted by my infatuation with GMJ, and so somewhat familiar with the Radha Soami diaspora, meditation practices, and some central texts of Radha Soami (such as the Sar Bachan) are still in my bookshelves.   What are considered Vedic writings is much broader than the original four Vedas.  Yes, Hinduism is a mash up and a very broad and inclusive pot, which is really my point.  I am not trying to go all na na nanny goat on this, just support the idea that it is not incorrect to see GMJ's lineage within the Hindu culture and inextricably tied to Hinduism.






Previous Current page Next
Re: Hinduism
Re: Re: Hinduism -- roark Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
rawatcher ®

05/08/2017, 19:36:54
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply
Well not according to Rawat himself who says he is a non-aligned peace educator but I agree with you. In the space out of 76 there was no local DLM satsang so I went to local satsangi satsang instead and now know more lapsed satsangis than lapsed premies. I wasn't taken with the esotericism or the mantra - simram - meditation, I'm too straightforward for the esotericism and bore too easily for the simram but while all groups have hypocrisy RS had a lot less tha DLM.






Previous Current page Next
Re: Hinduism
Re: Re: Hinduism -- rawatcher Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
roark ®

05/08/2017, 20:06:53
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply
Interesting, I never got the chance to hang with the RS's having made that slight detour running into GMJ.  Charan Singh has a requirement that one had to be alcohol, meat and drug free for either one or two years, which I completed before I was twenty.  I am just thankful that the balancing factor of my peyote and acid days predated that.  But then I ended up in the ashram and became fecking celibate, WTF arrrgggghhhhhh.  I did try to make up for things later in my defense.






Previous Current page Next
Re: Hinduism
Re: Re: Hinduism -- roark Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
rawatcher ®

05/08/2017, 21:15:05
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply
I don't think it was that long though I would have made the cut off when I "received Knowledge." Not too many of the premies at the satsangs I attended would have passed that test when they "received Knowledge" according to their testimony. Imagine if Rawat had demanded that as a prerequisite.






Previous Current page Next
yeah that business about Hinduism
Re: Hinduism -- PatD Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
aunt bea ®

05/07/2017, 05:36:18
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply
I didn't know if I should comment or not, and don't want to really go into detail, but in a word, the "New Voice's" characterization of Hinduism is completely wrong.

I certainly would not call myself an expert on the subject, but I did study it in college and even studied Sanskrit for a bit.

Rawat's references to Hindu scriptures doesn't make his philosophy Hinduism any more than Jim Jone's references to the Bible make him Christian.

Hinduism is first of all more like a collection of many religions rather than a single one, so it is very rich and complex. But the basic tenets of it are about following dharma (duty) which influences your karma (fate). Not so much different than Christianity actually, except that hell is being reborn rather than a place to roast marshmallows.

Anyway gurus and surrender are not a central thesis. There was a kind of populist Bhakti movement that evolved at some point around Krishna, kind of a fast track way of getting past the Brahmin (priest) gatekeepers. Today gurus do play a role in some offshoot sects of Hinduism, but this is definitely not the central tenet. Spend some time in an Indian temple and this will be obvious.






Previous Current page Next
Re: yeah that business about Hinduism
Re: yeah that business about Hinduism -- aunt bea Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
roark ®

05/07/2017, 12:21:44
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply

Hi Aunt
Bea,

I
have to disagree, I see it differently.

Just
look at the most popular 'modern' texts of Hinduism: the Mahabharata and the Ramayana.

The
central tenant of the Mahabharata resolves around Krishna, and his students, gopis, devotees
if you will.  Same goes for the Ramayana
and Rama.  The dominant theme ties into
devotional love for and the worship of a representative of God (“Guru”). 

There are soooo many sects of Hinduism, and I can even see Sikhism as a sect of Hinduism in a way.  One can even make a good argument that the Buddha was a nice Hindu boy, but did not tie what he learned to the
Vedas, thus the offshoot known as Buddhism. 
Looking closely, his eight-fold path was elucidated over prior centuries
within Vedic lore.  Then for the most
part, Guru Rinpoche took Buddhism to Tibet where it mixed with Bon and became
Tibetan Buddhism, and Bodhidharma took Buddhism to the far east, where it morphed
into Zen, all really parts of the same philosophical bucket. 

Anyway,
unless you want to split hairs, it is all emanated out of the Harappan
civilization, the original Vedas and that which was appended; and I would say
it would not be wrong at all to call the basket that holds this pot luck cornucopia of
religion and philosophy “Hinduism” (although personally I would use the term “Indiology”).  Some popular forms of Hinduism may not be so specifically
focused on Bhakti and surrender of a guru, it that theme is very, very
well-baked into Hinduism.  It is not
exactly science though, and I may have spent some time in Indian Temples, thanks.

Many lengthy, complicated and contradictory books have been written about this type of obviousness.

M








Previous Current page Next
I don't know where you get your info from
Re: Re: yeah that business about Hinduism -- roark Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
aunt bea ®

05/07/2017, 16:11:49
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply
but it makes no sense to me.

Mahabharata: probably the longest poem ever written. It's thousands of pages. Most of it has little to do with Krishna. And even the Bhagavad Gita, a very small part of it, though obviously important, is more about following the Hindu path of righteousness than about devotion to a, well actually it says nothing at all about devotion to a guru. Krishna is god.

Ramayana: I have no idea what you are talking about. That is not the Ramayana I have read. I think I own three different versions of it. And by the way, guru does not mean representative of god. And it also does not mean someone who brings you from darkness to light. The root of the word means heavy in Sanskrit, so he is the heavy guy.

Vedas: are first of all not in Sanskrit, they are spoken in Vedic, a language that is largely lost. There are 4 of them, the most important being the Rig Veda. The last time I checked, there was only one translation of this into English, by Wendy O'Flaherty. I might still have my copy. She only managed 10% of it. I can't remember anything in there about devotion and certainly nothing about gurus. The Vedic religion, the precursor of Hinduism, was focused on mysticism and ritual. The Hindu reformation mostly did away with the ritual because it apparently stressed everyone out too much. If you get the ritual wrong, all hell breaks loose. One that was still practiced fairly recently was a horse ritual where you follow a horse around for a year and do lots of sacraments. Obviously an expensive endeavor. I once watched a documentary of the last one ever performed.

A more interesting part of the Rig Veda is the description of and preparation of something called soma, which was some kind of psychedelic plant substance. One theory is that it was magic mushrooms, though this hasn't been proven.

Anyway, believe what you want, but I learned my Hinduism from some pretty smart people, some of whom were leading scholars at the time. And what you are saying doesn't make a lot of sense from a sociological point of view. Religions are a bulwark to the cultures they serve. They are like glue. Hinduism, for better or worse, is the thing that has kept Indian society together for some thousands of years. Simply put, perhaps overly simple, its function is to keep everyone in line. Questioning that status quo, that kind of subversion is what cults are for.






Previous Current page Next
Re: I don't know where you get your info from
Re: I don't know where you get your info from -- aunt bea Top of thread Post Reply Forum
Posted by:
roark ®

05/07/2017, 16:24:35
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin




Post Reply
Yeah, we'll have to agree to disagree

I have all four Vedas (translated into English) sitting on my shelves.  The Vedic writings went far beyond those four, and Hinduism is a big ole potpourri.  You should pity me that I spent so much time reading about this shit!  Be glad to send you a bibiolography

At a high level, Krishna and Rama were godmen, and had their devotees (circa Gopis and Hanuman), and Hinduism is chock full of this Guru principle.

Comeon man, hair splitting, we were fucking Hindus, be loud and proud, man!  Own it bro!

We were beautiful, young Hindus (but in Earth shoes unfortunately)

M







Previous Current page Next


Forum     Back