I see some of the "likes" which signals an awareness of the allegations, even if it is an awareness of the denial of the allegations, are from people who hold leadership positions in the Peace Education Program. PEP advertises their presence in schools, with minors, all over the world, and in world scouts leadership. Isn't this too, an issue? 

Who is supposed to decide whether or not an allegation is worth investigating? If you have a "conflict of interest" and a "whistleblower" policy... what the heck do they say? If the leader is the accused then it it fine for the family to deny it and look no further and insult the whistleblower online because after all, the head of the organization is by definition beyond reproach?  I doubt it says that. 

I imagine there is some mandated reporter stuff that applies, especially if someone has a mental health license or medical license, as do some of the "likes". The law is clear, that mandated reporters are not supposed to decide whether the allegation is true or not, just report reasonable suspicions. I doubt, I know him it is impossible, flies. 

I also think that the organization should not have any role whatsoever in choosing "who" does an investigation. No one with a horse in the game should choose that.  They should talk to me about what happened with the supposed Jagdeo investigation, and Anth, Karen, Deepak, Kathy G, Tim Gallwey, Valerio, Katie, Arthur B,  Glenn Whitaker, Dettmers, incomplete list here but examples of some people named as having a role either with exposing Jagdeo or managing the crisis or said internal investigation, at the time on the forum, any name mentioned at the time, or any person we heard about behind scenes.... all should be under penalty of perjury too. 

It's a pattern of how allegations are dealt with ... or buried.