Re: Hans Rawat Speaks Out: New article
Re: Re: Hans Rawat Speaks Out: New article -- lakeshore	Top of thread	Post Reply	Forum

Posted by: Thinking ® 04/06/2024, 10:48:00 Author Profile Edit Alert Forum Admin Post Reply

As Don reported above, Prem Rawat said “No, it didn’t, and the reason why it didn’t is because in our family, in our, in our whatever India was, it was very common. It was not a taboo thing.” “ A simple internet search provides this article from the  US National Library of Medicine (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326357/) that corroborates Rawat’s position - “The non-sexual genital touching of boys is reported widely in Asia. Michaelson (2004) reported that in Vietnam, adult relatives fondling their baby boys is an innocuous way of showing affection. Shirokogoroff (1973) reported that mothers from the Manchu community suck their sons’ penises as a means of soothing and strengthening their attachment (Halperin et al., 1990). Malley-Morrison and Denise (2004, p. 195) described how half the Vietnamese and Korean mothers, and 28% of Cambodian mothers found it acceptable for a grandfather to proudly touch the genitals of his grandson aged 3 years. Villarta-De Dios (2022) described how Filipino parents perceived holding and kissing genitalia (humawak o humalik sa ari) as appropriate in the context of hygiene and affection”.

Previous

Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Well done --- 13 ( Sat, Apr 06, 2024, 11:15:30 ) ( 135 bytes ) comments from Hindu people on this notion --- Susan ( Sat, Apr 06, 2024, 11:24:38 ) ( 188 bytes ) Re: Thinking More --- prembio ( Sat, Apr 06, 2024, 11:32:52 ) ( 1098 bytes ) thinking but not thinking clearly or objectively --- Susan ( Sat, Apr 06, 2024, 12:00:20 ) ( 3659 bytes ) +1 Re: thinking but not thinking clearly or objectively --- prembio ( Sat, Apr 06, 2024, 16:06:59 ) ( 5188 bytes ) link +1 Re: thinking but not thinking clearly or objectively --- Thinking ( Sun, Apr 07, 2024, 06:36:27 ) ( 1170 bytes ) +3 questions --- Susan ( Sun, Apr 07, 2024, 08:06:59 ) ( 2302 bytes ) +2 Re: questions (referenced post) someone would have to ask him what he meant --- Susan ( Sun, Apr 07, 2024, 23:38:29 ) ( 840 bytes ) link +1 Let’s not substitute our judgment for his --- Susan ( Mon, Apr 08, 2024, 00:36:33 ) ( 1438 bytes ) link Re: questions --- Thinking ( Mon, Apr 08, 2024, 07:19:31 ) ( 2206 bytes ) +3 Re: questions --- Susan ( Mon, Apr 08, 2024, 12:25:28 ) ( 1536 bytes ) Oh goodness! --- lesley ( Mon, Apr 08, 2024, 18:44:33 ) ( 994 bytes ) Re: questions --- tommo ( Tue, Apr 09, 2024, 06:04:01 ) ( 1756 bytes ) +1 Re: questions --- lesley ( Wed, Apr 10, 2024, 18:06:23 ) ( 245 bytes ) Re: thinking but not thinking clearly or objectively --- lakeshore ( Sun, Apr 07, 2024, 08:23:36 ) ( 1106 bytes ) Re: thinking but not thinking clearly or objectively --- Nik ( Sun, Apr 07, 2024, 11:00:38 ) ( 2461 bytes ) +1 One more (at least) --- lakeshore ( Mon, Apr 08, 2024, 06:14:51 ) ( 112 bytes ) Re: Hans Rawat Speaks Out: New article --- lesley ( Sat, Apr 06, 2024, 13:20:57 ) ( 1324 bytes ) Re: Hans Rawat Speaks Out: New article --- lakeshore ( Sat, Apr 06, 2024, 13:58:49 ) ( 1068 bytes ) Re: Hans Rawat Speaks Out: New article --- KarenK ( Sat, Apr 06, 2024, 16:13:07 ) ( 214 bytes ) +1 Re: He sort of did, hasn't he? (NT) --- prembio ( Sat, Apr 06, 2024, 19:36:12 ) ( 2 bytes ) +1 Re: He sort of did, hasn't he? (NT) --- KarenK ( Sat, Apr 06, 2024, 20:01:54 ) ( 78 bytes ) Re: A Sagacious Comment to John Miller and Prem Culters --- prembio ( Sat, Apr 06, 2024, 19:42:30 ) ( 1020 bytes ) So what is your opinion? --- aunt bea ( Mon, Apr 08, 2024, 04:42:27 ) ( 376 bytes )