As I always second guess my posts and try to anticipate and correct anything that might be misunderstood before it's too late, this one never occurred to me. My sentences out of order comment referred only to the lines from Pat W.'s post that I quoted in my post... lines that I cherry-picked and strung together out of order. I only mentioned it in case anyone might notice. My comment had nothing to do with your post.

To be clear, I very much appreciated your efforts to draw attention to how thoughtful and respectful Hans's Facebook posts were and continue to be. I also hope no one thought I was in any way minimizing Pat's acknowledgement of Hans's unassailable integrity.

My post wasn't even about what initially compelled me to make a post. In fact, before I went off in an entirely different direction, the very first line I wrote was:

While reading Hans's post, I was so captivated by his integrity that I was shocked, saddened and a little bit angered by the contrast between him and other family members who continue to shamelessly take sincere premies' money even as they attempt to conceal what they surely know and stand by silently as one of their own brothers (and sons!) and his wife are ostricized and smeared for telling the truth.

Anyway... thank you again for your post and helping to bridge Facebook and the forum.