Find

Reload

Overview
  NewestArchive
Admin
Knowledge for the WHOLE WORLD and the Rawat Devotional/Catholic Period
  Forum
Posted by:
Joe ®

01/26/2005, 12:46:47
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Remember how, at one time, Prem Rawat claimed that the whole world would receive knowledge? His brother, Bal Bahgwan Ji, who is now the "other" one and only Perfect Master of our time, said even the Pope would receive knowledge. (You can see him say it in the "Lord of the Universe" video (available on Amazon.com.)).  Down below, Thorin and Hamzen had a discussion about whether it was going to be 1975 or 1980 that Rawat would bring peace to the entire world.

I don't know if I had a date in mind, but I recall I believed it was relatively soon, like at least within 5-7 years. So, none of us felt it was necessary to do things like get an education, or start a family, or worry about having friends or a decent relationship with our relatives. None of that mattered because we got to be part of the establishment of the "United States of the Kingdom of Heaven on Earth," which would have at least one Divine City, if not more. Nixon and Breshnev were going to kiss. Muslims and Jews in the Middle East were going to have satsang together and share communally -- like one big ashram.

Anyhow, I think one of the reasons Rawat started drinking so heavily in the mid-70s and also got ulcers and severely high blood pressure, was that for some reason, the plan wasn't working too well. Millennium was a disaster and new devotees failed to materialize, and many of his existing devotees split, never to return. He got really angry at the world, particularly the press, for failing to prostrate before him, kiss his feet, and write glowing newspaper articles about how the savior of mankind was here.

[If you want to see an example of this anger, just check out the LOTU video that shows the Millennium press conference. Rawat is one smug and pissed off 15 year old, let me tell you, when the press has the audacity to ask him hard questions without proper deference. He clearly was not used to being treated that way.] That was the end of his ever doing press conferences, if you remember.

Anyhow, my theory is that after that, Rawat decided that because his plan wasn't working out, that he would show he was the perfect master of our time in other ways:

1. Demand ever greater levels of devotion and surrender from the devotees he still had. Hence, we have the 1977-1983 period, in which there wasn't really any propagation, but he screamed at us at every program about how messed up we were, how we weren't devoted enough, and that devotion to him was everything, even more important than practicing knowledge. A lot of Hilltop's great original quotes are from this period and prove that to be true.

2. Get married, have a lot of sex, drink and smoke a lot of dope, and get as many new residences, cars, clothes and anything else, befitting what he thought the status of the LIVING PERFECT MASTER OF OUR TIME, deserved.  Basically, have a grand old time now that he was out of the contraints of India, and his Mom.  Hence, it seemed more money was raised to fund his purchase of luxury goods than to run his mission.

3. Have continued proof that the premies were really devoted, by not only demanding that they raise millions to get him a Boeing 707, but have the premies (as opposed to some ignorant professional non-premies), uproot their lives and work 24/7 in slave conditions to revamp the plane with gold, leather, and jeweled fixtures.  I remember one time when I was at DECA working on Rawat's plane project, that Mr. Hession told me that Rawat had suggested that premies even weave the seat coverings for his plane.  I remember at the time thinking that this was Rawat's great concern for the premies, that they would get to have the divine "service" of doing that work, but in retrospect I think this was in the same category of wanting ever more proof that the premies would do absolutely anything for him, and, therefore, he must be THE LIVING PERFECT MASTER OF OUR TIME, helping to quell doubts in his own mind.

And this is all in addition, to the endless renditions of dancing with Krishna crowns, the countless darshan lines (how many times did you kiss Rawat's feet during that 7-year period?). It seemed like dozens, but for me, it must have been at least 25 times. (Cringe)

See, I believe that Rawat's "devotional, Catholic period" (thanks, Jim for the apt title), was imposed on us premies, not because it had anything to do with practicing knowledge, or experiencing peace, but due to the psychological insecurities of the LIVING PERFECT MASTER OF OUR TIME. I think the only way that period makes sense is that Rawat did it as psychological reinforcement for his own insecurities, to try to demonstrate that he really was who he thought he was, and as compensation for the fact that "the divine plan" wasn't working.

I've thought a lot about this, and it's the only way it makes sense to me. It's also probably a period that is the most problematic to Rawat in his attempts to reshape his image into something less megalomaniacal. In retrospect, it didn't help him too much. Of course, it was a LOT more damaging to all of us.

Any comments?






Modified by Joe at Wed, Jan 26, 2005, 13:09:08

Previous Recommend View All Current page Next
provocative
Re: Knowledge for the WHOLE WORLD and the Rawat Devotional/Catholic Period -- Joe Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
dant ®

01/26/2005, 13:32:19
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




It's a great theory, though it's hard to confirm of course. It reminds me of hypotheses by historians who study famous enigmas like Alexander, Napolean and Hitler which attempt to figure out what made them act the way they did. Brilliant actually! I think such theories are often true on at least some level even if they are not completely accurate. What I really like about it is that it works so well. It take into account all of the strange behavioural abberations of Rawat up until 1983. I can't wait for part two of your theory, the time after 1983, but I guess that is after you left anyway. My theory is that after 1983 he did some kind of soul searching, if you can call it that, and from out of that came the image makeover.

Rawat does have his Hallmark/poolhall-style cleverness about him I must admit. Trite euphemisms mixed in with bawdy humour and a good sense of timing. I don't think it makes him brilliant, I know lots of people with similar talents, but I don't think he is just a puppet or idiot either. It isn't a compliment for that matter though, because it makes him all the more culpable for his manipulation.







Previous Recommend Current page Next
The post-1983 period
Re: provocative -- dant Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Joe ®

01/26/2005, 14:36:17
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




True, I left the cult in March, 1983.  That's when I moved out of the ashram and into my own apartment.  I felt so burned that I didn't want anything to do with premies, nor them with me, since I was somewhat vocal in my criticisms of Mr. Rawat.  I did go to a couple of "events" after that, mostly out of curiosity, but I no longer believed Rawat was any kind of "master" at that point.  About the only person who remained a premie that I still hung out with was Richie Azzarone.  I have to say, he was about the only person who seemed to put friendship above the cult.  We agreed not to talk about the cult anymore, and that was fine with me.  But I really admire Richie for that.  It actually meant a lot to me at the time, because when you leave a cult you are pretty isolated for awhile.

At that point, let's face it, the premies were fried.  DECA collapsed into this "business," the ashrams looked like refugee camps, and Rawat had pretty much soaked both the physical and financial capabilities of all of them.  At least this was true in North America.  Everybody I knew was just kind of surviving as premies, and Rawat seemed burned out, too.

Anyhow, from what I gather, around that time Rawat actually wanted to quit being PERFECT MASTER OF OUR TIME.  I guess he did go through a lot of reflection on that.  Then, I am told, that Rawat didn't do any programs and later started having these "dinners," or "parties" and I guess Rawat smoked in front of the premies, and they drank alcohol and ate meat.  He seemed to be trying to change the way the premies related to him, and he to them.  I know a couple of people who are still premies who think that was the WEIRDEST period in the whole history of the cult.  Like most premies, they WANT him to be God, and many of them hate it if he starts to act like just another guy who is also some kind of meditation instructor.

Then, around 1988, Rawat did these "REJOICE" events and actually started talking about meditation and knowledge again.  I guess some people came back then.  Not me, however.

Rawat has never been able to maintain any kind of campaign to change his image from that of supreme being for very long.  He tried it in 1976 ("Humanitarian Leader" -- even suspended the feet-kissing ceremony for awhile) and again in the mid-80s with those "parties," but he seems always to revert back to giving darshan, and instituting ARTI, and dancing and being worshipped.  Again, I think this is partly because he has a psychological need to be worshipped and can't go to long without it.  Also, once the premies start to see him as something other than the SUPERIOR POWER IN PERSON, many of them tend to split, along with their financial support.  This happened in 1976, and I think it happend again in the 80s.

But Rawat always reverts to being God, because it always works with the premies who are the holdovers from the 70s. They are just into it, because it reinforces what they believe.  They love it.  It's fun, to a certain extent.  That's what makes "events" so high for people who believe that, because they believe he's really something supernatural.  It's more than being with a rockstar, because they believe Rawat is so powerful, that he actually knows them personally, and loves them.  It's a wonderful fairy tale, for sure.  And, I think on some level, it's what Rawat believes, too, or at least would like to believe.

It's just part of the pattern of his extremely werid life, at least in the West.  I think it's more that just the money.  I think he has a deep psychological problem -- a need to be worshipped and I don't think he's known anything else in his life.  How could he possibly be an ordinary person when he has never experienced that in his life?

So, because of that need, he will do things that completely undermine his stated mission -- like have people kiss his feet, have them sing arti, have them go ape-shit when he dances around, and the rest, while at the same time, claiming to be a "motivational speaker," who is just giving people the opportunity to experience peace.   He has this schizophrenic image that he tries to keep separated, but can't, partly because there are people who know about it, who aren't in on the deal to keep it secret from the public.

He tries to hide all that devotional stuff  in places like Amaroo, but it appears he is now doing the wobble dance again, even in Los Angeles, if I understand what happened this past weekend correctly. It's a recurring pattern with him.  Very predictable, actually.






Modified by Joe at Wed, Jan 26, 2005, 15:01:03

Previous Recommend Current page Next
He's a one trick pony alright.
Re: The post-1983 period -- Joe Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
PatD ®

01/26/2005, 16:36:19
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




.............it appears he is now doing the wobble dance again, even in Los Angeles, if I understand what happened this past weekend correctly. It's a recurring pattern with him.  Very predictable, actually.

It's interesting that in the candour of middle age he's willing to admit to having a 'nasty side'. What he can't yet admit to himself is that he's been a nasty little c***t through & through from about the age of 7.

So much for self awareness, eh.

What intrigues me is just who does he listen to when it comes to the really important subject of the money, & what will his reaction be when he's told that there isn't as much sloshing around as there once used to be. 







Previous Recommend Current page Next
great analysis Joe
Re: The post-1983 period -- Joe Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Susan ®

01/26/2005, 21:07:17
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Mishler's interview totally backs up what I saw in the 1976 "let's be normal" campaign. It sounded as if M was about to jump of the diving board into the human race and ran the other way- thus what we all experienced in the late seventies.

I was out by the early eighties. But Dettmers said he too was trying to get M to come down to earth. I don't have the dates.

It is interesting to think about what might be going on behind those beady little eyes.







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Bringing Maharaji into the flesh
Re: great analysis Joe -- Susan Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Joe ®

01/27/2005, 14:41:34
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Hi Susan.   Yes, I remember the 1976 period.  I actually was one of those who was disappointed that Rawat didn't give darshan during his Summer tour in 1976.  Then Rawat fired Mishler and became the dancing Krishna to satisfy his God complex and keep the cash coming in.  I mean, he had a family to support by then.

I remember Michael Dettmers saying that in the mid-80s he was trying to get Rawat to come down from the throne.  Unfortunately, one of the ways Rawat did that was starting to have sex with premies.  This was problematic, because while maybe Rawat's view of himself was changing (maybe only temporarily), the views of the premies did not.  So, we had the situation of the Lord of the Universe having sex with his devoted premies whom he was saying should surrender to him.  Blimey.  That's a problem

Dettmers said he was actually somewhat encouraged that Rawat wanted to have sex outside his marriage because he was lightening up and trying to be normal (if that's considered normal), but that Dettmers suggested prostitutes, and definitely not premies.  Apparently Rawat nixed the prostitute idea.  Maybe they wouldn't have been surrendered enough.

Disgusting, no?







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: Bringing Maharaji into the flesh
Re: Bringing Maharaji into the flesh -- Joe Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
PatD ®

01/27/2005, 16:25:45
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




You've made a valiant attempt with those two posts Joe, to think yourself into the mindset of what could be called a diseased personality, & quite possibly your analysis is accurate, but I don't believe we'll ever know for sure.

The striking thing about him for me, after I'd assimilated all the hitherto hidden information, & rid myself (with much help from others) of the last cobwebs of magical thinking, is his single mindedness.

One of the very 1st Divine Light mags, I think from late '71, had a photo of the 12 yr old Lord of the Universe on its cover. He was wearing a pilot's uniform.

34 yrs later he holds a clutch of licences, all of which require many years of application to gain, & for someone who has never been an airline employee, an unimaginable amount of money spent on hiring the aircraft necessary for him to prove his practical competence.

I don't think he's ever had any scruples about what he's done, & in a way it would be unrealistic to expect him to. In mentality he's a throwback to an earlier age of expendable serfs, unquestioned obedience, & the Divine Right of Kings, Indian style. 

The incredible thing is how he managed to transplant that to the West in the '70's. I guess we know some of the reasons.......the main one being the meditation trick.

In my view he's incomprehensible in our terms. Now that Google is going to put the entire C19th holding of one of the Oxford libraries on line, we will eventually be able to read the obscure monographs which contain the perceptions of those long forgotten individuals who had to make sense of the likes of Ranjit Singh or the Rani of Jansi. 

The clue to the way he thinks, I reckon, is to imagine yourself more in the world of Sheherezade, than in the C21st.

I could be way off the mark, but it's fun speculating, & in any case, fuck him.







Previous Recommend Current page Next
*******Best Of*******
Re: The post-1983 period -- Joe Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Jonathan ®

01/27/2005, 08:50:04
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Joe, your post is very well written.  You hit on points that make good sense, like the 1970's premies being Rawat's base. At his core, Rawat probably craves being worshipped and celebrated, since he has known nothing else in his "silver-spoon-fed" life.

The scary part, from my perspective as a late-comer, is that Rawat currently operates under the guise of being a supplement to daily life. His PR states openly that Rawatism is not a religion and is compatible with any belief system. 

Yet, dig a little beneath the "O-Negative Claims," and it becomes plain as day that Rawat's followers worship him. Bowing down to a Lord (as premies often refer to Rawat) is NOT compatible with any religion or belief system. Rawatism IS a mutually-exclusive religion. New devotees ARE pressured into absolving their doubts and prior beliefs in order to become fulfilled members.

Duplicity reigns supreme in all aspects of Rawat's cult, from the first video to the last drip.

 

 






Modified by Jonathan at Thu, Jan 27, 2005, 16:27:34

Previous Recommend Current page Next
Could you tell us more of your story, Jonathan?
Re: *******Best Of******* -- Jonathan Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
JHB ®

01/29/2005, 01:18:20
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Jonathan,

Maybe you have already and I missed it, but I'm interested in when you received Knowledge, and how was the process then.

All the best,

John.







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: Could you tell us more of your story, Jonathan?
Re: Could you tell us more of your story, Jonathan? -- JHB Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Lexy ®

01/29/2005, 08:23:08
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Hi Jonathan,

Following JHB's request I should like to say that whilst enjoying reading your posts, I too wondered about your interestingly different perspective.

I thought maybe you had never received " Nollidge" but were an "interested person" who had the good sense to check out Prem Rawat's credentials ?

Best wishes, Lexy.







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: Could you tell us more of your story, Jonathan?
Re: Re: Could you tell us more of your story, Jonathan? -- Lexy Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Jonathan ®

01/31/2005, 15:39:24
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Sorry, JHB and Lexy, for not seeing your posts until now. You probably remember me from F7, when, after getting pressured by my partner into attending many weekly Dish broadcasts and two events in Miami, I found the truth about Rawat on EPO.

Since learning about Rawat, things have been strained in our relationship. But, despite her best efforts to propagate me, the divide between us won't get better until this matter is resolved. She is incredibly devoted in her beliefs, and thinks that ex-premies did something wrong (i.e. against Rawat), and therefore are being punished and banished to EPO.  The logic is laughable at best and Hitler-esque at worst. But, she considers EPO to be filled with people who did something wrong, like ceasing practicing, and who now reside "beyond the pale" at EPO.

It's funny: the more she talks like that, the more I identify myself with ex-premies!

 






Modified by Jonathan at Mon, Jan 31, 2005, 15:43:00

Previous Recommend Current page Next
I dare Maharaji to read Joe's post
Re: Knowledge for the WHOLE WORLD and the Rawat Devotional/Catholic Period -- Joe Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Babaluji ®

01/27/2005, 00:21:30
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Check out the Millennium Press Conference where Maharaji is completely uptight and out of his element talking to the press:

5.7 MB WMV

http://gurumaharaji.info/video/lord_of_the_universe/millennium_press_conference_1973.wmv

And check out other excerpts of the "Lord of the Universe" documentary at: http://gurumaharaji.info/video/lord_of_the_universe/

I agree, Joe.  I think Maharaji was and still is a very damaged and needy human being no matter how well he dances or sings and no matter how tasteless his jokes are.

Maharaji, I feel sorry for you.

 

 

image





Previous Recommend Current page Next
which backfired, leading to the next phase(s)....
Re: Knowledge for the WHOLE WORLD and the Rawat Devotional/Catholic Period -- Joe Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
la-ex ®

01/27/2005, 17:55:39
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Joe-excellent analysis of the 70's and the "perfect master meltdown"...

To take it a step further, I think we saw:

1972-73-probably the most "innocent" period, leading to the 1973 millenium meltdown, then resurrected in 74&75, followed by the turbulent and infamous 1976 period in which premies began to have "workshops' and realized how programmed they had become...this meltdown was followed by the "super devotional-- this isn't your father's satguru" period of 1977, 78, 79, in which I think maharaji rebounded from almost losing the "mastership" as Mischler and others urged, into roaring back into devotion for one last try...

The 2 kissimmee festivals were big events, although after the last one, I remember the "vibe" just wasn't there in the communities very much, and satsang got really wierd and boring beyond belief, as premies tried to squeeze some magic out of the old s,s&m formula (S&M might be more appropriate?)..

Then the "secret project" the 707, pulled the action to Miami, although that was followed by the realization that the plane was a bust, too big, too polluting for US standards, too expensive, and eventually sold to another "maha', the maharishi....

I think at that period, in the early 80's, maharaji began to realize that he had milked this same old crowd for all it was worth...every "high" period was followed by a bust, and the propagation efforts never materialized beyond the original crew and a few friends etc...every big project eventually became a nightmare, with no increase in numbers...he couldn't "jump start" the premies into more devotion, so he blamed the premies, who were getting more burned out...

When Deca ran dry, and wierd, the ashrams were closed, and maharaji ran back to malibu...in one of the early ev websites, they noted that maharaji went into "semi-retirement" in the 83-84 period....I remember seeing Dettmers at that time in a meeitng he led, and he described maharaji as "in transition", or "waiting for the next phase" or something like that...

Then came the instructor programs in the mid 80's, which after a big hype, also went nowhere...I think he "came out" a bit then, smoking and drinking with premies, trying to pick up premie chicks...(a friend just told me the other day that his friend left the fold then-apparently his final "drip" was being at one of those instructor conferences and after listening to maharaji the whole day, he came down to the bar late at night, and saw maharaji apparently putting the "moves' on one of the female participants, and maharaji gave him the old "wink and a nod", as if to say to the premie "not bad, huh"...at least that was his take, and he wasn't seen again....)

I think he was always drinking and getting stoned regularly, but I think that in the early to mid 80's is when he really realized he was full of shit as far as the "perfect master"schtick went...also, it was 1981-2 when the "purge" happened, and all the old devotional materials were supposed to be thrown out...(nice move by Hilltop and others in keeping them in their attics and basements...)..it was also around 1984-5 that the "retreat" happened at San Yisidro ranch, where maharaji was confronted by premies for the first time, and possibly by his wife about his excessive drinking...

I remember many premies basically wondering "what's going on?" then, trying to figure out what to do next in their lives, especially the ashram ones, who were generally wandering around in a state of shock....

Fast forward to the late 90's when he started making noises about the "unique vision", "the new era of propagation", "secret trainings", "the 70's enthusiasm,with the 90's maturity" or some such clap trap etc.....

Once again I think he realized that it's not going anywhere, and declared that knowledge might become a "select club", especially after the emergence of the EPO site....

I think that his final attempt, after a long hiatus, was in the late 90's, but thank god for the internet, and the rest as they say, is history...

I think EPO was so much more effective at exposing him as a charlatan than he will ever admit, and I think the only hope he has left is keeping the few remaining premies with silly projects and things to do in order to keep donations rolling in the west, and keep the indian premies busy with large festival where he can get the devotion hs is so addicted to...







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: which backfired, leading to the next phase(s)....
Re: which backfired, leading to the next phase(s).... -- la-ex Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Joe ®

01/27/2005, 18:05:48
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Hi LA EX, all those things fit right into the story, and I'm sure we could think of a lot more.

Good point about the period before Millennium.  I agree that was the most honest and innocent period.  Unlike now, when you came to satsang, you knew full well about darshan, and worshipping the lotus feet and that he was the incarnation of God and all the rest.  Also, you could receive knowledge if you had gone to satsang for a month, or even a lot less sometimes.  Lots of people received knowledge after listening to satsang for one day!! There was none of this period of programming before you were considered "ready" to "have the experience."

It was also kind of exciting, not the dead process it is now.  We really thought we were bringing peace to the world and it was very exciting.  Everything led up to Millennium, and that was, well, kind of a letdown, to be sure.

Did you go to any of those "parties" that Rawat had in the mid-80s?  Did you actually see him smoke, drink and eat meat?  Was that weird to see?

I hadn't heard that Rawat was making the moves on premie women in public.  I always thought it was done quietly.  Dettmers said he basically served as a pimp for premie women for awhile, setting up sexual liaisons for Rawat with them, but had enough of it and refused to do it anymore after Rawat wouldn't talk to the women after he had sex with them, and he was forced to deal with all the emotional turmoil.

But I guess it made sense that he would do it at conferences, away from Durga Ji.  Dettmers said that in Malibu those sexual acts took place in hotel rooms, not at "the divine residence."

 

 






Modified by Joe at Thu, Jan 27, 2005, 18:12:16

Previous Recommend Current page Next
Let's not forget the Amaroo phase in the 90s
Re: Re: which backfired, leading to the next phase(s).... -- Joe Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Babaluji ®

01/28/2005, 10:10:39
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




But first I've got to tell both of you, Joe and la-ex, that imaging Maharaji having sex with probably the cream of the crop of premie women is just grossing me out.

I think the Amaroo phase starting in the early to mid 90's was an attempt at a jump start.  Certainly, many premies spent small fortune going to Australia once or even twice a year to spend a week in Shangri-La.  And Amaroo has quickly turned into a white elephant money pit.

Another phase in the 90s was the community video hall era.  While on occassion prior to videos the only satsang given was by instructors or instructor candidates and a small group of elite premies.  At least that was the deal in my last community.

The videos ended all premie satsang, but created Service opportunities that resulted in the over-controlled video event where you'd have 2 to 4 premies acting as ushers, a finance and info table person, the video technician, the manager, and the security person.  Meanwhile, there would only be about 6 people in the audience.

The community videos also required a financial commitment at the local level to provide for an Elan Vital approved hall that had to meet a stringent set of criteria.  This was in addition to the push for Direct Debit to fund the national organization.  I was easily spending $100 per month on both.  The leased facility in my community cost about $1600 per month or more.

I should note that the rare event in that particular community is held at a public facility.  I don't know what the one-time rental fee is.  It might even be free.

There's also another phase that I believe is happening now and that is the Dish TV broadcasts.  I'm not entirely certain since I'm no longer involved, but my guess is that the communities are dead and gone.  And that's a good thing when it comes to relieving local premies from having to pay for local events that provide little or no bang for the buck.  Thus, more money can go directly to Maharaji to allow him to fund the projects he desires.

 

 







Previous Recommend Current page Next
***BEST THREAD*** outline for a book IMHO!
Re: Let's not forget the Amaroo phase in the 90s -- Babaluji Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Hilltop ®

01/29/2005, 00:16:35
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators










Previous Recommend Current page Next
Agree absolutely
Re: ***BEST THREAD*** outline for a book IMHO! -- Hilltop Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Bunny ®

01/29/2005, 07:50:50
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




All of this may form the basis for a book - if anyone of you has the inclination - but at least, and more easily achievable - a really good article for EPO.

Thanks guys

Bunny







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: ***BEST THREAD*** outline for a book IMHO!/iI agree, plus...
Re: ***BEST THREAD*** outline for a book IMHO! -- Hilltop Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
la-ex ®

01/29/2005, 11:53:24
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




HT-I agree, this thread should probably be brought up to the top, and re-started, allowing other people to add their recollections of the different phases we all went through with rawat.....

I think the "current psychology' of each phase would be very interesting to look at, as it coincided with rawat's "current psychology" of each time...dates, event etc are important too, but I think the psychology of the whole thing would be fascinating to chronicle...

One thing that stands out to me like a sore thumb now, after having left for 5 years, is that each time a "new phase', or "new direction' came, it was really all about rawat and his current mess, rather in response to real premie needs, which a so called "leader" would be responsive to...also, his ability to 'mask" that, and our inability to "see" it....it all was billed as his "new direction"....also, the amount of defensiveness he displays without being noticed by the premies....

For instance, he kept the ashrams open because he feared the revenue would dry up if he closed them, even though they were clearly not working....he worried about rising health care costs for premies as they got older, their retirment etc., and abandoned them after they gave their entire lives to him, supposedly forever...

The list goes on for each phase...

If you ask me, if rawat wanted to do something "humanitarian" right now, it would be in cleaning up the mess in the victims lives of the"spiritual tsunami" he unleashed back in the 70's....I think you should start with your own life and the problems you have created in it, rather than having premies contribute to some "window dressing" like disaster relief to bolster your PR, when it can be done far more efficiently by the pros who do it every day...







Previous Recommend Current page Next
The images didn't show, Susan.......
Re: Original message -- Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Lexy ®

01/29/2005, 08:29:43
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Hi Susan, Are you having difficulty posting pics ( documents) ? You have to use the " Browse" button  to find and choose the image.( scroll down to bottom of page when you are posting) love Lexy.






Previous Recommend Current page Next


Forum     Back