I first tried to post this with an excerpt from the Heritage Foundation article and it was a complete mess but at last I deleted it all and start again ....

Hi Gregg, 

Whenever people tell me that it's apparent we're not going to agree on something, I ask myself why. Is it because there isn't enough evidence to resolve issues and answer questions or that perhaps no one's committed to the effort to find and consider that evidence and work through its implications? Or, instead, is it that people just like their opinions, their biases and prejudices and aren't about to give them up just because of some petty superior argument? If it's the latter, as I suspect here, you're right. It ain't ever going to happen. No way.

I just showed you a bunch of things, made some points about them but you haven't responded to any of it at all. In fact, I doubt you even looked. 

Did you read the Heritage Foundation article, brimming as it is with a good detailed survey of the cultural Marxism landscape in America as of one-and-a-half years ago? 

What about it? You say that the right and left are too focussed on transgenderism but what the hell is it anyway? Where's it come from and why? I'd have thought you'd at least consider some of the history. Instead, nothing but a pat statement that the right and left both focus too much on transgenderism. 

Okay ...... 

Did you read it? Can we discuss it? 

As for leadership,  well, I don't know. I don't think that one unique charismatic leader is necessary for a cult. What matters is the control and distortion of information and thinking. 

I don’t mean to seem impatient but I feel like I’m expecting too much perhaps. Ex-premies were all happy to revel in the Trump’s a cult leader idea but no one wants to hash it out. How disappointing. When it comes to Rawat, exes are happy to doggedly parse out each fact and quote with Talmudic-scholar level focus. I guess that level of close scrutiny doesn’t extend much.