The biggest con of all --- Old Timer ( Sat, Jun 27, 2009, 11:48:43 ) (237 reads) ( 441 bytes ) +101
|
Re: The biggest con of all --- Lp ( Sat, Jun 27, 2009, 12:38:52 ) (146 reads) ( 756 bytes ) +2
- Re: The biggest con of all --- a0aji ( Sat, Jun 27, 2009, 13:11:19 ) (141 reads) ( 538 bytes ) +2
- Re: The biggest con of all --- karenl ( Sat, Jun 27, 2009, 13:44:46 ) (111 reads) ( 705 bytes ) +2
Re: The biggest con of all --- johnnyboy ( Sat, Jun 27, 2009, 16:24:49 ) (89 reads) ( 3118 bytes ) +1
- Looking back --- Lp ( Sat, Jun 27, 2009, 17:14:36 ) (132 reads) ( 2429 bytes ) +3
- Re: Looking back --- lakeshore ( Sat, Jun 27, 2009, 19:48:40 ) (92 reads) ( 3289 bytes ) +1
- Re: Looking back --- Cynthia ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 09:23:44 ) (77 reads) ( 2521 bytes ) +1
- Re: Looking back --- lakeshore ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 17:29:47 ) (61 reads) ( 2894 bytes ) +1
- Re: Looking back --- Nik ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 03:46:02 ) (79 reads) ( 1418 bytes )
Re: Looking back --- johnnyboy ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 07:29:00 ) (61 reads) ( 1045 bytes ) +1
- Re: The biggest con of all --- a0aji ( Sat, Jun 27, 2009, 18:54:09 ) (91 reads) ( 127 bytes )
Hey aoaji... --- Cynthia ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 07:27:36 ) (64 reads) ( 289 bytes ) +1
- Re: Hey aoaji... --- a0aji ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 09:03:14 ) (67 reads) ( 209 bytes )
- Re: The biggest con of all --- cultfree ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 02:46:15 ) (59 reads) ( 149 bytes ) +1
- Re: God --- gregg ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 20:03:41 ) (38 reads) ( 219 bytes ) +1
- Re: God --- rgj ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 16:49:47 ) (31 reads) ( 1200 bytes ) +1
- Re: God --- PatD ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 19:56:23 ) (30 reads) ( 957 bytes )
- Re: the bigger con’ --- Nik ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 03:03:33 ) (90 reads) ( 2330 bytes ) +5
you highlight another superlative. --- Lp ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 04:46:10 ) (76 reads) ( 1305 bytes )
- Re: the bigger con’ --- lakeshore ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 06:32:19 ) (85 reads) ( 6396 bytes ) +1
- Wow --- Lp ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 07:07:46 ) (81 reads) ( 4234 bytes ) +1
- Re: Wow --- lakeshore ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 07:32:40 ) (63 reads) ( 2570 bytes ) +2
Exactly! --- Lp ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 07:35:07 ) (68 reads) ( 1100 bytes ) +1
-
A careless thief! --- lakeshore ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 08:09:57 ) (69 reads) ( 2643 bytes ) +3
- Getting back our interest.
--- Lp ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 08:48:11 ) (87 reads) ( 2982 bytes ) +2
- 'non premie man'? --- jool ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 10:55:52 ) (50 reads) ( 29 bytes ) +1
Similar (no text) --- Lp ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 11:26:21 ) (7 reads) ( 0 bytes )
- Re: Getting back our interest.
--- lakeshore ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 16:09:56 ) (64 reads) ( 7091 bytes ) +3
That sounds idyllic, my dream in one. --- Lp ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 16:27:28 ) (51 reads) ( 1248 bytes ) +1
-
Subliminal bongos and other causes for celebration! --- lakeshore ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 15:38:34 ) (43 reads) ( 3574 bytes ) +1
I am celebrating having such friends --- Lp ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 17:37:12 ) (68 reads) ( 5357 bytes ) +2
-
Oh, Oh, Oh!! You bought a Les Paul!!! --- lakeshore ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 20:19:28 ) (41 reads) ( 2448 bytes ) +1
- You got it! Talk about clues.
--- Lp ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 20:36:10 ) (46 reads) ( 2740 bytes ) +2
- Re: You got it! Talk about clues.
--- lakeshore ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 21:22:53 ) (32 reads) ( 2276 bytes ) +1
Same sound practically, --- Lp ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 21:38:22 ) (35 reads) ( 842 bytes ) +1
-
Yes, too heavy! --- lakeshore ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 14:40:20 ) (30 reads) ( 2157 bytes ) +1
I'm speechless --- Lp ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 15:10:48 ) (42 reads) ( 2102 bytes ) +2
-
Me too, Lp --- lakeshore ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 20:37:10 ) (36 reads) ( 1020 bytes )
-
My apologies, Lp --- lakeshore ( Wed, Jul 01, 2009, 09:57:41 ) (31 reads) ( 4120 bytes ) +2
At last --- snow-white ( Wed, Jul 01, 2009, 14:30:06 ) (24 reads) ( 260 bytes ) +1
-
Re: At last --- lakeshore ( Wed, Jul 01, 2009, 16:47:55 ) (28 reads) ( 1424 bytes ) +1
- Re:
Re: At last --- snow-white ( Thu, Jul 02, 2009, 07:12:09 ) (19 reads) ( 372 bytes ) img
- No apologies needed or appropriate
--- Lp ( Thu, Jul 02, 2009, 03:40:33 ) (30 reads) ( 3238 bytes ) +1
- Late Correction --- Lp ( Fri, Jul 03, 2009, 03:17:45 ) (15 reads) ( 133 bytes ) +1
8 a.m. ... Awesome! (no text) --- Lp ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 04:00:49 ) (9 reads) ( 0 bytes )
The only activity in order. --- Lp ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 17:25:33 ) (44 reads) ( 710 bytes )
Hi you guys - what a lovely little exchange... --- johnnyboy ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 18:48:59 ) (43 reads) ( 1137 bytes ) img +2
Thankyou John --- Lp ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 19:15:16 ) (36 reads) ( 1002 bytes ) +3
I also have my shed!!! --- Ash ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 19:31:56 ) (32 reads) ( 714 bytes ) +1
Sorry Ash but a 'virtual shed' just isn't the same!! (no text) --- johnnyboy ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 19:37:18 ) (11 reads) ( 0 bytes ) +1
Talking of sheds!!..... --- johnnyboy ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 03:23:10 ) (32 reads) ( 463 bytes ) +1
Re: Talking of sheds!!..... --- Jethro ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 03:43:17 ) (39 reads) ( 141 bytes ) link file img +1
What were you growing in your shed Jethro?? (no text) --- johnnyboy ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 04:14:20 ) (9 reads) ( 0 bytes ) +1
a lawn mower. a tent, part-full paint tins,,,<cough, cough>?? nt (no text) --- Jethro ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 06:47:43 ) (10 reads) ( 0 bytes ) +1
Yep! "the just in casers" which crust over and never get used! (no text) --- johnnyboy ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 05:07:38 ) (5 reads) ( 0 bytes )
Or - Maybe it's universal?? --- johnnyboy ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 03:30:01 ) (39 reads) ( 415 bytes ) +1
From what I've seen, --- Lp ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 12:56:58 ) (43 reads) ( 642 bytes ) +2
- Re: From what I've seen, --- Kabir ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 14:11:37 ) (40 reads) ( 209 bytes ) +3
Sounds an interesting movie, I'll look out for it. (no text) --- Lp ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 14:45:03 ) (8 reads) ( 0 bytes ) +1
I have the book, if you want to read it (no text) --- Jethro ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 15:00:21 ) (9 reads) ( 0 bytes ) +1
Great film Kabir - a must watch (or read!) (no text) --- johnnyboy ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 17:10:17 ) (5 reads) ( 0 bytes ) +1
- also great acting (no text) --- snow-white ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 06:42:03 ) (5 reads) ( 0 bytes )
A beautiful film, I just loved it! (no text) --- Ash ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 17:17:22 ) (5 reads) ( 0 bytes )
(Particularly: unseen by a partner.) --- Ash ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 17:16:21 ) (17 reads) ( 60 bytes )
-
Re: Hi you guys - what a lovely little exchange... --- lakeshore ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 14:51:35 ) (33 reads) ( 1369 bytes ) +2
Re: A careless thief! --- johnnyboy ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 09:26:02 ) (50 reads) ( 2556 bytes ) img +1
-
Dear John and Ash --- lakeshore ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 12:34:14 ) (31 reads) ( 1664 bytes ) +2
- Re:
Dear John and Ash --- Ash ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 17:14:25 ) (27 reads) ( 1571 bytes ) +1
- Re:
Dear John and Ash --- lakeshore ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 21:11:52 ) (17 reads) ( 186 bytes ) +1
No, no! I actually liked it! (no text) --- Ash ( Wed, Jul 01, 2009, 11:13:24 ) (3 reads) ( 0 bytes )
The Feelings are mutual Lakeshore... --- johnnyboy ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 17:39:45 ) (26 reads) ( 1190 bytes )
- Re:
A careless thief! --- Ash ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 10:36:27 ) (38 reads) ( 2356 bytes )
- Nevertheless --- snow-white ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 10:11:39 ) (36 reads) ( 659 bytes ) +1
- Re: the bigger con’ --- jool ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 06:52:49 ) (55 reads) ( 1027 bytes )
- Re: the bigger con’ --- ocker ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 15:22:04 ) (38 reads) ( 1456 bytes ) +2
- No, Nik - I'm with Old Timer on this one... Definitely the biggest con. --- Nigel ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 11:26:56 ) (55 reads) ( 2067 bytes ) +2
- this really does pin point the deception. --- Lp ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 13:30:34 ) (56 reads) ( 2139 bytes ) +2
- The abuse of trust thing is fundamental... --- Nigel ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 14:12:52 ) (41 reads) ( 952 bytes ) +1
- Yes, that is correct. (no text) --- Lp ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 14:37:36 ) (3 reads) ( 0 bytes )
- Far more than a deception - a wholesale corruption! --- lakeshore ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 16:06:23 ) (47 reads) ( 1417 bytes ) +1
- Re: No, Nik - I'm with Old Timer on this one... Definitely the biggest con. --- Nik ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 03:49:14 ) (36 reads) ( 5282 bytes ) +3
- Rewards... --- lakeshore ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 12:05:44 ) (49 reads) ( 5432 bytes )
- There seems to be a 'category error', going on in this discussion, Nik --- Nigel ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 12:45:37 ) (38 reads) ( 1981 bytes ) +1
- Re: No, Nik - I'm with Old Timer on this one... Definitely the biggest con. --- ocker ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 13:42:53 ) (34 reads) ( 1118 bytes )
- Re: The biggest con of all Wow! --- old Timer ( Wed, Jul 01, 2009, 01:57:38 ) (29 reads) ( 244 bytes )
|
|