Prem Rawat Talk Forum - The Keys to Freedom

19502-20001/20001

New Post

Admin

Discovering More --- Ebay Alert ( Fri, Jul 03, 2009, 09:01:12 ) (79 reads) ( 785 bytes ) link +8

No bids though... --- Mike Finch ( Fri, Jul 03, 2009, 09:48:22 ) (58 reads) ( 481 bytes ) +2
- Re: No bids though... --- Ebay Alert ( Fri, Jul 03, 2009, 09:52:25 ) (50 reads) ( 96 bytes )
- Re: No bids though... --- lakeshore ( Fri, Jul 03, 2009, 10:26:14 ) (53 reads) ( 1785 bytes ) +1
  - Like the first gleaming --- Lp ( Fri, Jul 03, 2009, 16:32:26 ) (18 reads) ( 318 bytes )
Re: Discovering More (it isn't one of the Keys) --- Cynthia ( Fri, Jul 03, 2009, 11:42:48 ) (52 reads) ( 442 bytes ) +2
- considering that people sell Jesus toast on Ebay, --- aunt bea ( Fri, Jul 03, 2009, 11:55:46 ) (39 reads) ( 77 bytes )
- It's only logic --- Jean-Michel ( Fri, Jul 03, 2009, 12:21:15 ) (43 reads) ( 159 bytes ) +1
  - Re: It's only logic --- Cynthia ( Fri, Jul 03, 2009, 15:13:51 ) (34 reads) ( 549 bytes )

So Prem, How Many Premies Do You Have? Don't be shy now ... --- ocker ( Fri, Jul 03, 2009, 01:23:07 ) (84 reads) ( 8293 bytes ) link +4

What on earth...? --- Lp ( Fri, Jul 03, 2009, 02:32:50 ) (81 reads) ( 1714 bytes )
Re: So Prem, How Many Premies Do You Have? Don't be shy now ... --- Nik ( Fri, Jul 03, 2009, 03:53:40 ) (60 reads) ( 1450 bytes )
What strikes me is..... --- johnnyboy ( Fri, Jul 03, 2009, 05:14:21 ) (57 reads) ( 2969 bytes ) img +1
- Re: Oh you have my deepest, deepest sympathies --- ocker ( Fri, Jul 03, 2009, 07:19:49 ) (52 reads) ( 1454 bytes )

No-notice programs. Instant gratification or what?... --- Cynthia ( Thu, Jul 02, 2009, 12:12:37 ) (128 reads) ( 1715 bytes ) +11

...a twelve-month event scheule? --- Ash ( Thu, Jul 02, 2009, 12:50:12 ) (74 reads) ( 746 bytes )
Re: No-notice programs. Instant gratification or what?... --- Mike Finch ( Thu, Jul 02, 2009, 14:04:37 ) (102 reads) ( 947 bytes ) +1
- Nail on head, Mike...! --- Cynthia ( Thu, Jul 02, 2009, 14:56:19 ) (82 reads) ( 1682 bytes ) +1
  - Re: Nail on head, Mike...! (and Tim) --- lakeshore ( Thu, Jul 02, 2009, 19:35:12 ) (58 reads) ( 5034 bytes )
Re: No-notice programs. Instant gratification or what?... --- PatD ( Thu, Jul 02, 2009, 14:49:16 ) (79 reads) ( 1328 bytes ) img +1
- Re: No-notice programs. Instant gratification or what?... --- Cynthia ( Fri, Jul 03, 2009, 13:40:20 ) (13 reads) ( 548 bytes )
no interest in him anymore ?... --- tommo ( Thu, Jul 02, 2009, 16:38:35 ) (71 reads) ( 1000 bytes ) img +1
- Re: no interest in him anymore ?... --- Cynthia ( Fri, Jul 03, 2009, 13:48:24 ) (19 reads) ( 970 bytes )
Very curious ...... --- DP ( Fri, Jul 03, 2009, 06:05:35 ) (45 reads) ( 426 bytes ) +1
- Re: Very curious ...... --- Cynthia ( Fri, Jul 03, 2009, 13:43:11 ) (22 reads) ( 192 bytes )
To be a premie must really be *FUN* nowadays... --- Ash ( Fri, Jul 03, 2009, 17:34:55 ) (2 reads) ( 260 bytes )

Talking to premies on Facebook --- Kelly ( Wed, Jul 01, 2009, 11:32:41 ) (166 reads) ( 1620 bytes ) +23

Aw, can you get me an FB introduction, Kar - I've missed teasing premies... (no text) --- Nigel ( Wed, Jul 01, 2009, 11:40:31 ) (22 reads) ( 0 bytes ) +1
- Re: Aw, can you get me an FB introduction, Kar - I've missed teasing premies... --- Kelly ( Wed, Jul 01, 2009, 13:41:19 ) (108 reads) ( 246 bytes ) +1
  - Shooting ducks... --- Nigel ( Fri, Jul 03, 2009, 12:55:29 ) (20 reads) ( 661 bytes ) +1
    - Re: Shooting ducks... --- Cynthia ( Fri, Jul 03, 2009, 15:16:01 ) (13 reads) ( 166 bytes )
Re: Talking to premies on Facebook --- Nik ( Wed, Jul 01, 2009, 14:51:57 ) (131 reads) ( 538 bytes ) img +3
- I think Sandoz directed "satguru has come" nt (no text) --- Jethro ( Thu, Jul 02, 2009, 00:00:50 ) (11 reads) ( 0 bytes )
- Reply to Nik --- Kelly ( Thu, Jul 02, 2009, 10:31:56 ) (61 reads) ( 645 bytes )
- Re: Talking to premies on Facebook --- Kelly ( Thu, Jul 02, 2009, 12:08:15 ) (56 reads) ( 21 bytes ) file img
A quote from Jaques Sandoz. Interesting questions. --- Kelly ( Wed, Jul 01, 2009, 15:53:54 ) (124 reads) ( 1108 bytes ) +1
- Re: propulse me at high speed into Heaven --- ocker ( Wed, Jul 01, 2009, 22:26:18 ) (85 reads) ( 346 bytes ) +1
  - Re: propulse me at high speed into Heaven --- cultfree ( Thu, Jul 02, 2009, 00:53:58 ) (85 reads) ( 528 bytes ) +2
    - Re: propulse me at high speed into Heaven --- lakeshore ( Thu, Jul 02, 2009, 05:33:01 ) (71 reads) ( 4113 bytes ) +2
      - Re: propulse me at high speed into Heaven --- ocker ( Thu, Jul 02, 2009, 06:02:28 ) (56 reads) ( 151 bytes ) +1
        
        Dear Ocker --- snow-white ( Thu, Jul 02, 2009, 06:50:08 ) (61 reads) ( 106 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Dear Snow White --- johnnyboy ( Thu, Jul 02, 2009, 10:00:33 ) (52 reads) ( 264 bytes )
      - Re: propulse me at high speed into Heaven --- Lp ( Thu, Jul 02, 2009, 12:00:50 ) (63 reads) ( 1899 bytes ) +1
        
        That sounds about right, Lp --- lakeshore ( Fri, Jul 03, 2009, 08:12:41 ) (22 reads) ( 2183 bytes )
    - Re: propulse me at high speed into Heaven --- snow-white ( Thu, Jul 02, 2009, 06:56:20 ) (55 reads) ( 96 bytes ) +2
      - Here's a dull moment!.... --- johnnyboy ( Thu, Jul 02, 2009, 14:31:40 ) (41 reads) ( 234 bytes ) +1
        
        (NT) (no text) --- snow-white ( Thu, Jul 02, 2009, 15:11:37 ) (5 reads) ( 0 bytes )
      - A song we used to sing to...god maharaji: --- cultfree ( Fri, Jul 03, 2009, 01:14:34 ) (24 reads) ( 457 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: A song we used to sing to...god maharaji: --- snow-white ( Fri, Jul 03, 2009, 01:22:20 ) (23 reads) ( 188 bytes ) img
Jacques in 1972 --- Jean-Michel ( Thu, Jul 02, 2009, 12:21:32 ) (70 reads) ( 518 bytes )

Moving On --- shereelove ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 07:14:52 ) (187 reads) ( 1635 bytes ) +17

Yes --- Lp ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 08:14:01 ) (118 reads) ( 948 bytes ) +1
- More yes for LP --- shereelove ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 11:15:52 ) (91 reads) ( 836 bytes ) +2
  - Just guessing --- Lp ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 13:06:29 ) (86 reads) ( 514 bytes )
  - Thanks Sheree - --- Bette ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 19:57:49 ) (49 reads) ( 544 bytes ) +1
    - The desire to feel good brought us there. --- shereelove ( Wed, Jul 01, 2009, 08:06:27 ) (32 reads) ( 1048 bytes )
Re: Moving On --- flying solo ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 19:43:24 ) (101 reads) ( 2835 bytes ) +3
- Re: The Words but what about the Voice --- ocker ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 19:56:24 ) (96 reads) ( 651 bytes ) file img +1
  - Vomit --- PatD ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 20:58:01 ) (85 reads) ( 146 bytes )
- weeping (no text) --- flying solo ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 20:04:02 ) (21 reads) ( 0 bytes ) +1
  - weeping --- lakeshore ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 20:08:42 ) (142 reads) ( 407 bytes ) +1
    - dancing (no text) --- shereelove ( Wed, Jul 01, 2009, 08:20:00 ) (8 reads) ( 0 bytes )
- Re: Moving On --- shereelove ( Wed, Jul 01, 2009, 08:18:14 ) (41 reads) ( 969 bytes )
Wonderful to read that --- snow-white ( Wed, Jul 01, 2009, 01:14:41 ) (60 reads) ( 512 bytes ) +1
- Good news is good news. --- shereelove ( Wed, Jul 01, 2009, 08:27:42 ) (39 reads) ( 392 bytes ) +1
  - Hi Sheree --- snow-white ( Wed, Jul 01, 2009, 16:49:53 ) (21 reads) ( 1025 bytes )
Great Sheree! --- Ash ( Wed, Jul 01, 2009, 14:06:01 ) (30 reads) ( 345 bytes ) +1
- yeah for us --- shereelove ( Wed, Jul 01, 2009, 15:45:53 ) (30 reads) ( 549 bytes )

The biggest con of all --- Old Timer ( Sat, Jun 27, 2009, 11:48:43 ) (237 reads) ( 441 bytes ) +101

Re: The biggest con of all --- Lp ( Sat, Jun 27, 2009, 12:38:52 ) (146 reads) ( 756 bytes ) +2
- Re: The biggest con of all --- a0aji ( Sat, Jun 27, 2009, 13:11:19 ) (141 reads) ( 538 bytes ) +2
  - Re: The biggest con of all --- karenl ( Sat, Jun 27, 2009, 13:44:46 ) (111 reads) ( 705 bytes ) +2
    - Re: The biggest con of all --- johnnyboy ( Sat, Jun 27, 2009, 16:24:49 ) (89 reads) ( 3118 bytes ) +1
      - Looking back --- Lp ( Sat, Jun 27, 2009, 17:14:36 ) (132 reads) ( 2429 bytes ) +3
        
        Re: Looking back --- lakeshore ( Sat, Jun 27, 2009, 19:48:40 ) (92 reads) ( 3289 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Looking back --- Cynthia ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 09:23:44 ) (77 reads) ( 2521 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Looking back --- lakeshore ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 17:29:47 ) (61 reads) ( 2894 bytes ) +1
        
        Hold the phone here... --- Cynthia ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 21:59:54 ) (56 reads) ( 681 bytes ) +1
        
        And the bus, too! --- lakeshore ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 09:38:09 ) (64 reads) ( 7924 bytes )
        
        Re: Looking back --- Nik ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 03:46:02 ) (79 reads) ( 1418 bytes )
        Re: Looking back --- johnnyboy ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 07:29:00 ) (61 reads) ( 1045 bytes ) +1
        
        Strange how we interpreted eveything --- Lp ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 06:55:07 ) (50 reads) ( 1710 bytes )
    - Re: The biggest con of all --- a0aji ( Sat, Jun 27, 2009, 18:54:09 ) (91 reads) ( 127 bytes )
  - Hey aoaji... --- Cynthia ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 07:27:36 ) (64 reads) ( 289 bytes ) +1
    - Re: Hey aoaji... --- a0aji ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 09:03:14 ) (67 reads) ( 209 bytes )
- Re: The biggest con of all --- cultfree ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 02:46:15 ) (59 reads) ( 149 bytes ) +1
  - Re: God --- gregg ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 20:03:41 ) (38 reads) ( 219 bytes ) +1
    - Re: God --- rgj ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 16:49:47 ) (31 reads) ( 1200 bytes ) +1
      - Re: God --- PatD ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 19:56:23 ) (30 reads) ( 957 bytes )
Re: the bigger con� --- Nik ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 03:03:33 ) (90 reads) ( 2330 bytes ) +5
- you highlight another superlative. --- Lp ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 04:46:10 ) (76 reads) ( 1305 bytes )
- Re: the bigger con� --- lakeshore ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 06:32:19 ) (85 reads) ( 6396 bytes ) +1
  - Wow --- Lp ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 07:07:46 ) (81 reads) ( 4234 bytes ) +1
    - Re: Wow --- lakeshore ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 07:32:40 ) (63 reads) ( 2570 bytes ) +2
      - Exactly! --- Lp ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 07:35:07 ) (68 reads) ( 1100 bytes ) +1
        
        A careless thief! --- lakeshore ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 08:09:57 ) (69 reads) ( 2643 bytes ) +3
        
        Getting back our interest. --- Lp ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 08:48:11 ) (87 reads) ( 2982 bytes ) +2
        
        'non premie man'? --- jool ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 10:55:52 ) (50 reads) ( 29 bytes ) +1
        
        Similar (no text) --- Lp ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 11:26:21 ) (7 reads) ( 0 bytes )
        
        Re: Getting back our interest. --- lakeshore ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 16:09:56 ) (64 reads) ( 7091 bytes ) +3
        
        That sounds idyllic, my dream in one. --- Lp ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 16:27:28 ) (51 reads) ( 1248 bytes ) +1
        
        Subliminal bongos and other causes for celebration! --- lakeshore ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 15:38:34 ) (43 reads) ( 3574 bytes ) +1
        
        I am celebrating having such friends --- Lp ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 17:37:12 ) (68 reads) ( 5357 bytes ) +2
        
        Oh, Oh, Oh!! You bought a Les Paul!!! --- lakeshore ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 20:19:28 ) (41 reads) ( 2448 bytes ) +1
        
        You got it! Talk about clues. --- Lp ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 20:36:10 ) (46 reads) ( 2740 bytes ) +2
        
        Re: You got it! Talk about clues. --- lakeshore ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 21:22:53 ) (32 reads) ( 2276 bytes ) +1
        
        Same sound practically, --- Lp ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 21:38:22 ) (35 reads) ( 842 bytes ) +1
        
        Yes, too heavy! --- lakeshore ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 14:40:20 ) (30 reads) ( 2157 bytes ) +1
        
        I'm speechless --- Lp ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 15:10:48 ) (42 reads) ( 2102 bytes ) +2
        
        Me too, Lp --- lakeshore ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 20:37:10 ) (36 reads) ( 1020 bytes )
        My apologies, Lp --- lakeshore ( Wed, Jul 01, 2009, 09:57:41 ) (31 reads) ( 4120 bytes ) +2
        
        At last --- snow-white ( Wed, Jul 01, 2009, 14:30:06 ) (24 reads) ( 260 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: At last --- lakeshore ( Wed, Jul 01, 2009, 16:47:55 ) (28 reads) ( 1424 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Re: At last --- snow-white ( Thu, Jul 02, 2009, 07:12:09 ) (19 reads) ( 372 bytes ) img
        
        No apologies needed or appropriate --- Lp ( Thu, Jul 02, 2009, 03:40:33 ) (30 reads) ( 3238 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: No apologies needed or appropriate --- lakeshore ( Thu, Jul 02, 2009, 14:03:23 ) (29 reads) ( 3566 bytes )
        
        Late Correction --- Lp ( Fri, Jul 03, 2009, 03:17:45 ) (15 reads) ( 133 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Late Correction --- lakeshore ( Fri, Jul 03, 2009, 07:38:19 ) (11 reads) ( 245 bytes )
        
        8 a.m. ... Awesome! (no text) --- Lp ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 04:00:49 ) (9 reads) ( 0 bytes )
        
        The only activity in order. --- Lp ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 17:25:33 ) (44 reads) ( 710 bytes )
        Hi you guys - what a lovely little exchange... --- johnnyboy ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 18:48:59 ) (43 reads) ( 1137 bytes ) img +2
        
        Thankyou John --- Lp ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 19:15:16 ) (36 reads) ( 1002 bytes ) +3
        
        I also have my shed!!! --- Ash ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 19:31:56 ) (32 reads) ( 714 bytes ) +1
        
        Sorry Ash but a 'virtual shed' just isn't the same!! (no text) --- johnnyboy ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 19:37:18 ) (11 reads) ( 0 bytes ) +1
        
        Why the hell do you ALWAYS *have to* contradict me???? *heehee* --- Ash ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 19:42:21 ) (33 reads) ( 91 bytes )
        
        Talking of sheds!!..... --- johnnyboy ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 03:23:10 ) (32 reads) ( 463 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Talking of sheds!!..... --- Jethro ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 03:43:17 ) (39 reads) ( 141 bytes ) link file img +1
        
        What were you growing in your shed Jethro?? (no text) --- johnnyboy ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 04:14:20 ) (9 reads) ( 0 bytes ) +1
        
        a lawn mower. a tent, part-full paint tins,,,<cough, cough>?? nt (no text) --- Jethro ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 06:47:43 ) (10 reads) ( 0 bytes ) +1
        
        Yep! "the just in casers" which crust over and never get used! (no text) --- johnnyboy ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 05:07:38 ) (5 reads) ( 0 bytes )
        
        Or - Maybe it's universal?? --- johnnyboy ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 03:30:01 ) (39 reads) ( 415 bytes ) +1
        
        From what I've seen, --- Lp ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 12:56:58 ) (43 reads) ( 642 bytes ) +2
        
        Re: From what I've seen, --- Kabir ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 14:11:37 ) (40 reads) ( 209 bytes ) +3
        
        Sounds an interesting movie, I'll look out for it. (no text) --- Lp ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 14:45:03 ) (8 reads) ( 0 bytes ) +1
        
        I have the book, if you want to read it (no text) --- Jethro ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 15:00:21 ) (9 reads) ( 0 bytes ) +1
        
        Thanks Jethro, I'd like to borrow it. --- Lp ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 18:11:23 ) (13 reads) ( 43 bytes )
        
        Great film Kabir - a must watch (or read!) (no text) --- johnnyboy ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 17:10:17 ) (5 reads) ( 0 bytes ) +1
        
        also great acting (no text) --- snow-white ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 06:42:03 ) (5 reads) ( 0 bytes )
        
        A beautiful film, I just loved it! (no text) --- Ash ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 17:17:22 ) (5 reads) ( 0 bytes )
        
        (Particularly: unseen by a partner.) --- Ash ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 17:16:21 ) (17 reads) ( 60 bytes )
        
        Re: Hi you guys - what a lovely little exchange... --- lakeshore ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 14:51:35 ) (33 reads) ( 1369 bytes ) +2
        
        Oh-oh --- you're on dangerous territory here.... --- Ash ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 17:25:54 ) (28 reads) ( 597 bytes )
        Re: It all started with a... --- johnnyboy ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 18:08:59 ) (18 reads) ( 1061 bytes )
        
        Re: A careless thief! --- johnnyboy ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 09:26:02 ) (50 reads) ( 2556 bytes ) img +1
        
        Dear John and Ash --- lakeshore ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 12:34:14 ) (31 reads) ( 1664 bytes ) +2
        
        Re: Dear John and Ash --- Ash ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 17:14:25 ) (27 reads) ( 1571 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Dear John and Ash --- lakeshore ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 21:11:52 ) (17 reads) ( 186 bytes ) +1
        
        No, no! I actually liked it! (no text) --- Ash ( Wed, Jul 01, 2009, 11:13:24 ) (3 reads) ( 0 bytes )
        
        The Feelings are mutual Lakeshore... --- johnnyboy ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 17:39:45 ) (26 reads) ( 1190 bytes )
        
        Re: A careless thief! --- Ash ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 10:36:27 ) (38 reads) ( 2356 bytes )
      - Nevertheless --- snow-white ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 10:11:39 ) (36 reads) ( 659 bytes ) +1
        
        ..and only the best to you as well... --- Ash ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 10:45:41 ) (31 reads) ( 868 bytes ) +1
        
        Thank you so much, Ash --- snow-white ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 01:35:21 ) (18 reads) ( 143 bytes )
- Re: the bigger con� --- jool ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 06:52:49 ) (55 reads) ( 1027 bytes )
- Re: the bigger con� --- ocker ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 15:22:04 ) (38 reads) ( 1456 bytes ) +2
  - You're completely right! --- Ash ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 19:41:10 ) (26 reads) ( 272 bytes ) +1
    - Re: You're completely right! - but I'll add just one thing... --- johnnyboy ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 06:21:06 ) (33 reads) ( 769 bytes )
  - Re: the bigger con� --- Nik ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 14:41:20 ) (27 reads) ( 2339 bytes )
- No, Nik - I'm with Old Timer on this one... Definitely the biggest con. --- Nigel ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 11:26:56 ) (55 reads) ( 2067 bytes ) +2
  - this really does pin point the deception. --- Lp ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 13:30:34 ) (56 reads) ( 2139 bytes ) +2
    - The abuse of trust thing is fundamental... --- Nigel ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 14:12:52 ) (41 reads) ( 952 bytes ) +1
      - Yes, that is correct. (no text) --- Lp ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 14:37:36 ) (3 reads) ( 0 bytes )
    - Far more than a deception - a wholesale corruption! --- lakeshore ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 16:06:23 ) (47 reads) ( 1417 bytes ) +1
      - I think it works well here too --- snow-white ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 02:11:58 ) (29 reads) ( 177 bytes )
  - Re: No, Nik - I'm with Old Timer on this one... Definitely the biggest con. --- Nik ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 03:49:14 ) (36 reads) ( 5282 bytes ) +3
    - Rewards... --- lakeshore ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 12:05:44 ) (49 reads) ( 5432 bytes )
    - There seems to be a 'category error', going on in this discussion, Nik --- Nigel ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 12:45:37 ) (38 reads) ( 1981 bytes ) +1
      - Re: There seems to be a 'category error', going on in this discussion, Nik --- Cynthia ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 14:21:02 ) (37 reads) ( 915 bytes )
    - Re: No, Nik - I'm with Old Timer on this one... Definitely the biggest con. --- ocker ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 13:42:53 ) (34 reads) ( 1118 bytes )
Re: The biggest con of all Wow! --- old Timer ( Wed, Jul 01, 2009, 01:57:38 ) (29 reads) ( 244 bytes )

What does it take to exit? --- Ash ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 05:17:33 ) (137 reads) ( 51 bytes ) +20

That's a tough one Ash! --- johnnyboy ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 07:11:05 ) (96 reads) ( 1771 bytes ) +2
- Re: Let's not mince words! --- ocker ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 17:37:23 ) (75 reads) ( 1449 bytes ) +1
  - Re: Let's not mince words! --- johnnyboy ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 19:27:50 ) (54 reads) ( 1140 bytes )
- This site is not EPO --- JHB ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 01:57:42 ) (72 reads) ( 229 bytes ) +1
  - That's true - Sincere apologies for the 'irk' John!! (no text) --- johnnyboy ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 03:09:35 ) (15 reads) ( 0 bytes )
"Assessing the Damage"... --- Cynthia ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 09:01:19 ) (116 reads) ( 8818 bytes ) +3
- Very valuable info, Cynthia! --- Ash ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 10:15:33 ) (51 reads) ( 2505 bytes ) +1
  - Re: Very valuable info, Cynthia! --- Cynthia ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 16:33:07 ) (46 reads) ( 2516 bytes ) +2
    - You're really sweet, Cynthia! --- Ash ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 18:42:51 ) (35 reads) ( 2192 bytes ) +1
      - Re: You're really sweet, Cynthia! --- Cynthia ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 21:50:19 ) (13 reads) ( 2502 bytes )
    - Re: Very valuable info, Cynthia! --- cultfree ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 22:17:28 ) (34 reads) ( 263 bytes ) +1
      - Re: Very valuable info, Cynthia! --- Cynthia ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 10:08:31 ) (28 reads) ( 415 bytes )
- Re: "Assessing the Damage"... --- gregg ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 10:46:14 ) (58 reads) ( 731 bytes )
- Re: "Assessing the Damage"... --- jool ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 11:05:34 ) (51 reads) ( 814 bytes )
Re: What does it take to exit? --- Nik ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 11:34:53 ) (74 reads) ( 1118 bytes )
Re: What does it take to exit? --- Elaine B. ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 15:28:56 ) (68 reads) ( 78 bytes ) +1
- Wow - so easy! --- Ash ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 19:03:08 ) (42 reads) ( 142 bytes )
A good friend --- praline ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 01:37:40 ) (49 reads) ( 46 bytes )
Re: What does it take to exit? --- wolfie ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 03:00:15 ) (69 reads) ( 339 bytes ) +1
- Re: What does it take to exit? --- Bette ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 20:22:21 ) (23 reads) ( 127 bytes )

When Prem Rawat Is Humble --- ocker ( Fri, Jun 26, 2009, 16:58:55 ) (181 reads) ( 19.1 KB ) link +5

Re: When Prem Rawat Is Humble --- lakeshore ( Fri, Jun 26, 2009, 19:16:32 ) (83 reads) ( 1010 bytes ) +1
- Re: When Prem Rawat Is Humble --- ocker ( Fri, Jun 26, 2009, 20:39:57 ) (78 reads) ( 862 bytes ) +1
  - Great, Ocker --- snow-white ( Fri, Jun 26, 2009, 23:28:33 ) (64 reads) ( 133 bytes )
To Be or Not To Be - that is the question... --- johnnyboy ( Sat, Jun 27, 2009, 04:38:51 ) (64 reads) ( 548 bytes )
Re: When Prem Rawat Is Humble --- Bette ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 20:10:29 ) (17 reads) ( 122 bytes )

Rawat at Thousand Oaks, June 7th... --- Cynthia ( Wed, Jun 24, 2009, 08:59:37 ) (266 reads) ( 59 bytes ) +57

Funny, I thought "speak" was a verb --- Jim ( Wed, Jun 24, 2009, 10:50:04 ) (153 reads) ( 262 bytes ) +3
- It's all flexible Jim. --- 13 ( Wed, Jun 24, 2009, 14:35:41 ) (107 reads) ( 119 bytes )
- Re: Funny, I thought "speak" was a verb --- Cynthia ( Wed, Jun 24, 2009, 15:35:38 ) (112 reads) ( 268 bytes )
- Structures of speech aside, --- Bette ( Tue, Jun 30, 2009, 19:37:59 ) (14 reads) ( 274 bytes )
Re: Rawat at Thousand Oaks, June 7th... --- johnnyboy ( Wed, Jun 24, 2009, 11:43:27 ) (134 reads) ( 491 bytes ) +2
- Re: Rawat at Thousand Oaks, June 7th... --- cultfree ( Wed, Jun 24, 2009, 23:28:33 ) (82 reads) ( 175 bytes ) +1
  - Don't I Know It!! But I'll never understand it? (no text) --- johnnyboy ( Thu, Jun 25, 2009, 03:29:52 ) (15 reads) ( 0 bytes )
- Re: Rawat at Thousand Oaks, June 7th... --- Cynthia ( Thu, Jun 25, 2009, 07:23:52 ) (93 reads) ( 1037 bytes ) +2
  - Re: Rawat at Thousand Oaks, June 7th... --- johnnyboy ( Thu, Jun 25, 2009, 15:50:18 ) (47 reads) ( 625 bytes ) +1
    - Absolutely, Johnnyboy!!! --- Cynthia ( Fri, Jun 26, 2009, 07:11:22 ) (44 reads) ( 412 bytes )
  - Re: Rawat at Thousand Oaks, June 7th... --- a0aji ( Sat, Jun 27, 2009, 12:19:06 ) (57 reads) ( 2685 bytes ) +3
    - Re: And On Anand Ji?? --- johnnyboy ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 05:47:21 ) (33 reads) ( 661 bytes ) +1
      - Yes Once Upon A Time I Did 'Typeset' My Handle That Way -- catchy isn't it. (no text) --- a0aji ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 08:45:33 ) (9 reads) ( 0 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Yes Once Upon A Time I Did 'Typeset' My Handle That Way -- catchy isn't it. --- johnnyboy ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 12:11:09 ) (21 reads) ( 364 bytes )
    - Is riding a bike more dangerous than belonging to a cult ? --- lexy ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 09:18:37 ) (35 reads) ( 1929 bytes ) +2
      - Nice post, lexy. Thank you. (no text) --- a0aji ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 09:58:12 ) (11 reads) ( 0 bytes )
      - Re: Is riding a bike more dangerous than belonging to a cult ? --- PatD ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 12:40:38 ) (30 reads) ( 1326 bytes ) img +4
        
        ditto PatD, --- Jethro ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 12:50:59 ) (21 reads) ( 372 bytes )
        Re: Is riding a green bike sometimes belonging to a cult ? --- Lp ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 13:13:14 ) (50 reads) ( 2991 bytes ) +2
        
        green cyclists in the Totnes (OT) --- 13 ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 14:38:13 ) (26 reads) ( 658 bytes ) +2
        
        Give what a whirl? OT --- Lp ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 14:50:31 ) (45 reads) ( 848 bytes ) +2
        
        Boat... OT --- 13 ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 16:09:32 ) (23 reads) ( 624 bytes ) link +1
        
        A nice spot! --- Lp ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 16:47:30 ) (25 reads) ( 172 bytes )
        
        Re: Give what a whirl? OT --- JHB ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 02:03:25 ) (24 reads) ( 387 bytes ) +1
        
        Bikes are like that (no text) --- Lp ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 18:31:10 ) (4 reads) ( 0 bytes )
        
        Re: green cyclists in the Totnes (OT) --- tommo ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 17:34:21 ) (18 reads) ( 524 bytes )
        
        the psychology of perception --- PatD ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 19:25:37 ) (20 reads) ( 954 bytes ) +1
        
        Oops...convex. I'm up too late (NT) --- PatD ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 19:55:02 ) (8 reads) ( 1 bytes ) +1
        
        Strange, I read it as convex --- Lp ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 18:39:17 ) (12 reads) ( 161 bytes )
        
        Re: Is riding a bike more dangerous than belonging to a cult ? --- Cynthia ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 16:52:13 ) (28 reads) ( 2219 bytes )
        Re: Is riding a bike more dangerous than belonging to a cult ? --- tommo ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 18:05:40 ) (17 reads) ( 781 bytes ) +1
        
        Well observed Tim --- Lp ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 20:21:34 ) (15 reads) ( 62 bytes )
    - You're so right Chris... --- Cynthia ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 16:16:57 ) (17 reads) ( 2685 bytes )
A song parody for the purest of premies --- karenl ( Thu, Jun 25, 2009, 05:57:28 ) (79 reads) ( 901 bytes ) link +1
- Re: A song parody for the purest of premies --- Cynthia ( Thu, Jun 25, 2009, 07:36:56 ) (72 reads) ( 277 bytes )
Re: Rawat at Thousand Oaks, June 7th... --- lakeshore ( Thu, Jun 25, 2009, 09:19:20 ) (88 reads) ( 4506 bytes ) +3
- Re: Rawat at Thousand Oaks, June 7th... --- Jethro ( Thu, Jun 25, 2009, 10:13:38 ) (72 reads) ( 298 bytes ) +1
  - Thank you, Jethro --- lakeshore ( Thu, Jun 25, 2009, 20:18:13 ) (56 reads) ( 588 bytes ) +1
    - Did I miss something? (no text) --- Lp ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 15:29:45 ) (5 reads) ( 0 bytes )
- Re: Rawat at Thousand Oaks, June 7th... --- Cynthia ( Thu, Jun 25, 2009, 10:41:35 ) (64 reads) ( 968 bytes )
- Re: Rawat at Thousand Oaks, June 7th... --- cultfree ( Thu, Jun 25, 2009, 21:16:15 ) (47 reads) ( 534 bytes ) +2
  - Re: Rawat at Thousand Oaks, June 7th... --- snow-white ( Fri, Jun 26, 2009, 02:01:06 ) (41 reads) ( 436 bytes )
  - Thank you, Cultfree! --- lakeshore ( Fri, Jun 26, 2009, 09:50:08 ) (75 reads) ( 5117 bytes ) +1
    - Re: Thank you, Cultfree! --- cultfree ( Fri, Jun 26, 2009, 20:22:21 ) (25 reads) ( 538 bytes )
About the Buddha... --- gregg ( Thu, Jun 25, 2009, 11:36:52 ) (89 reads) ( 180 bytes ) +1
- Re: About the Buddha... --- ocker ( Thu, Jun 25, 2009, 12:00:57 ) (96 reads) ( 643 bytes ) +1
  - Re: About the Buddha... --- lakeshore ( Thu, Jun 25, 2009, 20:39:36 ) (74 reads) ( 1268 bytes ) +1
    - Re: Re: About the Buddha...(Warning bad language and obscene thoughts) --- ocker ( Fri, Jun 26, 2009, 03:01:20 ) (80 reads) ( 1904 bytes ) +2
      - Honestly Ocker - you should wash your mouth out with soap!! (no text) --- johnnyboy ( Fri, Jun 26, 2009, 06:33:28 ) (12 reads) ( 0 bytes )
      - Re: Re: About the Buddha...(Warning bad language and obscene thoughts) --- lakeshore ( Fri, Jun 26, 2009, 11:25:53 ) (68 reads) ( 3276 bytes ) +2
        
        The truth about the laughing Buddha --- Jethro ( Fri, Jun 26, 2009, 13:44:55 ) (55 reads) ( 513 bytes ) file img +1
        
        (no text) --- Lp ( Fri, Jun 26, 2009, 13:48:50 ) (8 reads) ( 0 bytes )
        
        'What does God need with a starship?' -- Capt. Kirk (NT) (no text) --- a0aji ( Sat, Jun 27, 2009, 13:28:42 ) (16 reads) ( 0 bytes ) +2
        
        He said that? Good ole' Cap'n Kirk --- Lp ( Sat, Jun 27, 2009, 17:35:45 ) (53 reads) ( 894 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: He said that? Good ole' Cap'n Kirk --- a0aji ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 10:07:06 ) (24 reads) ( 174 bytes ) link
        
        Oh my god, is that Aoaji? --- Nigel ( Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 15:13:37 ) (24 reads) ( 91 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Oh my god, is that Aoaji? --- a0aji ( Thu, Jul 02, 2009, 16:47:37 ) (10 reads) ( 768 bytes )

for all older people OT --- Jethro ( Fri, Jun 26, 2009, 15:05:53 ) (104 reads) ( 102 bytes )

Former Scientologist leader, "...they are just outright evil.'' --- karenl ( Tue, Jun 23, 2009, 07:30:17 ) (146 reads) ( 1006 bytes ) link +2

Re: Former Scientologist leader, "...they are just outright evil.'' --- Cynthia ( Tue, Jun 23, 2009, 11:34:06 ) (101 reads) ( 204 bytes )
Oh dear, they were not only evil, but 'wrong from a Scientology viewpoint'... --- Nigel ( Tue, Jun 23, 2009, 17:09:35 ) (107 reads) ( 568 bytes )

Divine Light Mission 1974 --- Nik ( Tue, Jun 23, 2009, 04:15:55 ) (147 reads) ( 4601 bytes ) +1

You can pencil Notingham in too.... --- johnnyboy ( Tue, Jun 23, 2009, 09:02:58 ) (95 reads) ( 467 bytes ) img

I just ate two scrambled eggs --- Jim ( Sun, Jun 21, 2009, 14:35:22 ) (197 reads) ( 571 bytes ) +76

Re: I just ate two scrambled eggs --- ocker ( Sun, Jun 21, 2009, 15:59:59 ) (121 reads) ( 535 bytes ) file img
You're such liar Jim --- Jean-Michel ( Sun, Jun 21, 2009, 17:24:19 ) (139 reads) ( 157 bytes ) +1
- I wish! --- Jim ( Sun, Jun 21, 2009, 19:34:37 ) (117 reads) ( 297 bytes ) +2
  - I've struggled between meat eating and not for years --- karenl ( Sun, Jun 21, 2009, 21:13:08 ) (89 reads) ( 756 bytes ) +2
    - What The Heck are They Putting in Beef These Days!? --- Steve ( Sun, Jun 21, 2009, 21:26:08 ) (132 reads) ( 127 bytes ) link +2
      - Thanks, Steve, that's very nice --- Jim ( Sun, Jun 21, 2009, 22:35:19 ) (87 reads) ( 1 bytes )
      - Re: What The Heck are They Putting in Beef These Days!? --- shereelove ( Sun, Jun 21, 2009, 23:07:35 ) (69 reads) ( 181 bytes ) +1
        
        Problem with that 'scare' tactic is that this applies more to veg than meat!! (no text) --- johnnyboy ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 01:05:12 ) (27 reads) ( 0 bytes )
    - Re: I've struggled between meat eating and not for years --- Jim ( Sun, Jun 21, 2009, 22:34:02 ) (100 reads) ( 775 bytes ) +3
      - Re: I've struggled between meat eating and not for years --- Fiona ( Sun, Jun 21, 2009, 23:17:45 ) (89 reads) ( 499 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: I've struggled between meat eating and not for years --- Jim ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 16:22:56 ) (53 reads) ( 1632 bytes ) +1
        
        KFC is NOT chicken!! --- Fiona ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 19:29:48 ) (69 reads) ( 1320 bytes ) +1
        
        I'm with you all the way except for one thing .... --- Jim ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 20:44:06 ) (63 reads) ( 439 bytes ) +1
        
        See? --- Jim ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 21:14:23 ) (62 reads) ( 29 bytes ) link +1
        
        I'm gobsmacked --- Fiona ( Tue, Jun 23, 2009, 00:19:43 ) (63 reads) ( 1451 bytes )
      - Jim - if you must indulge just be sure your flesh is fresh.... --- johnnyboy ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 13:55:28 ) (42 reads) ( 415 bytes )
      - Re: I've struggled between meat eating and not for years --- laural ( Sat, Jun 27, 2009, 05:45:22 ) (14 reads) ( 222 bytes )
  - Re: I wish! --- Jean-Michel ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 10:55:54 ) (48 reads) ( 370 bytes ) +1
    - Good thing your clients can't understand French or English, no? --- Jim ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 11:33:08 ) (62 reads) ( 975 bytes ) +2
      - You're a realized soul for sure ! --- Jean-Michel ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 11:38:24 ) (53 reads) ( 268 bytes ) +2
        
        Lots of Bordeaux... --- Ash ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 11:42:56 ) (38 reads) ( 102 bytes )
        Realized soul ... realized soul .... hm, where have I heard that ... hm ..... --- Jim ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 12:14:42 ) (47 reads) ( 595 bytes )
      - Re: Good thing you gave up MD! --- Ash ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 11:40:59 ) (43 reads) ( 223 bytes ) +1
        
        What's MD? --- Jim ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 14:36:13 ) (51 reads) ( 165 bytes ) +2
        
        Jim - I suggest you wait till the eggs have settled first!! --- johnnyboy ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 15:46:46 ) (44 reads) ( 5 bytes )
        Great! --- Ash ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 15:47:53 ) (46 reads) ( 509 bytes ) +1
        
        Seriously, I think that WAS the reason --- Jim ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 16:14:45 ) (48 reads) ( 271 bytes ) +1
        
        You don't wanna know! --- Ash ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 16:20:21 ) (37 reads) ( 307 bytes )
I just ate roadkill! --- 13 ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 01:10:46 ) (68 reads) ( 926 bytes )
The healthiest thing you can eat.... --- Ash ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 01:54:07 ) (80 reads) ( 311 bytes ) +2
- Can it be that simple? --- 13 ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 03:01:39 ) (71 reads) ( 4082 bytes ) file img +3
  - Re: Can it be that simple? --- johnnyboy ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 03:51:49 ) (48 reads) ( 1998 bytes ) img +1
    - Re: Can it be that simple? --- 13 ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 04:15:06 ) (47 reads) ( 642 bytes ) +2
      - Re: Can it be that simple? --- johnnyboy ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 04:34:53 ) (43 reads) ( 743 bytes )
      - Well - yes! Under certain conditions though... --- Ash ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 09:00:45 ) (37 reads) ( 1592 bytes ) +1
        
        My question was about values, not meat --- 13 ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 13:59:18 ) (39 reads) ( 1558 bytes ) +1
        
        Oh I see... --- Ash ( Tue, Jun 23, 2009, 05:02:40 ) (27 reads) ( 3201 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Oh I see... --- lakeshore ( Tue, Jun 23, 2009, 08:47:47 ) (28 reads) ( 806 bytes ) +1
        
        Yes LS! --- Ash ( Tue, Jun 23, 2009, 13:49:55 ) (24 reads) ( 1893 bytes )
  - Nice ship, 13! OT --- lakeshore ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 10:42:50 ) (41 reads) ( 139 bytes ) +1
    - Your OT made me smile (no text) --- snow-white ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 23:17:09 ) (8 reads) ( 0 bytes )
  - Re: Can it be that simple? --- Kabir ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 13:14:52 ) (30 reads) ( 242 bytes )
- Why we don't eat horses, and good meat versus poor meat --- JHB ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 05:15:21 ) (65 reads) ( 1261 bytes ) +1
  - Re: Who says we don't eat horses? --- ocker ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 07:04:57 ) (46 reads) ( 465 bytes )
Re: I just ate two scrambled eggs --- Moley ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 07:59:54 ) (56 reads) ( 100 bytes ) +2
- Oh - do you also remember him talking about that? --- Ash ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 09:21:10 ) (37 reads) ( 306 bytes )
- WTF is "salad cream"? --- Jim ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 17:42:33 ) (38 reads) ( 353 bytes ) +2
  - Re: WTF is "salad cream"? --- Fiona ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 19:44:01 ) (44 reads) ( 429 bytes ) +1
    - Salad cream sounds like the worst stuff in the world --- Jim ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 21:02:47 ) (31 reads) ( 517 bytes )
  - Anybody here eat "Vegenaise" mayo by Follow Your Heart? --- karenl ( Wed, Jun 24, 2009, 11:34:26 ) (18 reads) ( 131 bytes )
Re: I just ate two scrambled eggs --- lakeshore ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 10:20:21 ) (36 reads) ( 190 bytes ) +1
- Re: Re: I just ate two scrambled eggs --- Jim ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 17:44:44 ) (30 reads) ( 329 bytes )
Reasons for and (mostly against) vegetarianism - not entirely OT... --- Nigel ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 13:33:24 ) (63 reads) ( 860 bytes ) link +2
- Re: Reasons for and (mostly against) vegetarianism - not entirely OT... --- Jim ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 16:39:46 ) (53 reads) ( 551 bytes ) +1
  - Stop being so NICE, Jim, I'm getting all disoriented ... --- Nigel ( Tue, Jun 23, 2009, 13:02:52 ) (42 reads) ( 1478 bytes ) +1
    - I kind of have to be nice now that I'm one of the only Jews in the BNP --- Jim ( Tue, Jun 23, 2009, 20:39:04 ) (44 reads) ( 604 bytes )
- Re: Reasons for and (mostly against) vegetarianism - not entirely OT... --- tommo ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 18:36:56 ) (40 reads) ( 265 bytes ) +2
  - Re: Reasons for and (mostly against) vegetarianism - not entirely OT... --- turey ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 19:07:55 ) (37 reads) ( 532 bytes )
  - Admirable fortitude, Tim.. --- Nigel ( Tue, Jun 23, 2009, 13:23:37 ) (32 reads) ( 745 bytes )
You're almost a saint, Jim... --- Cynthia ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 16:52:01 ) (70 reads) ( 1095 bytes ) +2
- They didn't have buffalo when I was a kid --- Jim ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 17:27:29 ) (51 reads) ( 1233 bytes )
- You're almost a saint, Jim. --- hilltop ( Tue, Jun 23, 2009, 21:17:59 ) (59 reads) ( 585 bytes ) +1
  - I think she was being sarcastic, Hilltop --- Jim ( Tue, Jun 23, 2009, 22:05:55 ) (50 reads) ( 598 bytes ) +1
    - So you are a believer after all Jim! --- hilltop ( Tue, Jun 23, 2009, 23:51:14 ) (49 reads) ( 1035 bytes ) +1
      - Re: So you are a believer after all Jim! --- Jim ( Wed, Jun 24, 2009, 14:13:23 ) (38 reads) ( 90 bytes ) link
Re: I just ate two scrambled eggs --- DP ( Tue, Jun 23, 2009, 05:15:02 ) (64 reads) ( 747 bytes ) +1
- How stark! --- Jim ( Tue, Jun 23, 2009, 23:28:11 ) (48 reads) ( 1068 bytes ) +2
  - Oh Jim! - You keep bringing it all back! --- johnnyboy ( Wed, Jun 24, 2009, 04:24:08 ) (35 reads) ( 1946 bytes ) img
  - Re: How stark! but nice --- DP ( Wed, Jun 24, 2009, 07:02:32 ) (41 reads) ( 575 bytes )
It sounds like a conspiracy theory to me. Maybe this will help ya... --- hilltop ( Tue, Jun 23, 2009, 19:50:42 ) (75 reads) ( 544 bytes ) file img +3
- Re: It sounds like a conspiracy theory to me. Maybe this will help ya... --- johnnyboy ( Wed, Jun 24, 2009, 04:28:30 ) (35 reads) ( 43 bytes )
- What!? Twenty-four hour a day meditation? --- lakeshore ( Wed, Jun 24, 2009, 04:30:50 ) (53 reads) ( 1177 bytes ) +1
  - Duplicate message deleted (no text) --- lakeshore ( Wed, Jun 24, 2009, 04:38:06 ) (13 reads) ( 0 bytes )
- Re: I have a copy of that sh*tsang --- ocker ( Sat, Jun 27, 2009, 13:51:43 ) (19 reads) ( 29.6 KB )
Re: I just ate two scrambled eggs --- Elaine B. ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 15:37:53 ) (11 reads) ( 240 bytes ) +1
- They are quite binding --- Lp ( Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 16:10:53 ) (15 reads) ( 455 bytes )

Cold Kipper logic --- Nik ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 04:00:40 ) (143 reads) ( 1893 bytes ) +7

Re: Cold Kipper OR Cod Peace??? --- johnnyboy ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 05:03:24 ) (92 reads) ( 1185 bytes ) +1
- Or Con Peace... --- lakeshore ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 09:43:05 ) (100 reads) ( 3540 bytes ) +2
  - You're completely right! --- Ash ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 11:37:21 ) (77 reads) ( 442 bytes )
  - Re: Who Were These Mahatmas? --- ocker ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 16:40:27 ) (87 reads) ( 2688 bytes ) +1
    - Re: Who Were These Mahatmas? --- lakeshore ( Mon, Jun 22, 2009, 21:19:49 ) (118 reads) ( 9240 bytes ) link +1
      - Re: Where is this clarity and simplicity? --- ocker ( Tue, Jun 23, 2009, 06:02:20 ) (59 reads) ( 849 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Where is this clarity and simplicity? --- lakeshore ( Tue, Jun 23, 2009, 09:34:40 ) (71 reads) ( 5051 bytes )

Dinner with a Former Ashram Sister --- Marianne ( Sun, Jun 21, 2009, 01:09:50 ) (181 reads) ( 1121 bytes ) +3

Re: Dinner with a Former Ashram Sister --- old Timer ( Sun, Jun 21, 2009, 03:34:10 ) (129 reads) ( 245 bytes )
Dinner with a Former Ashram Sister --- AJW ( Tue, Jun 23, 2009, 05:55:09 ) (70 reads) ( 460 bytes )
Hi Marianne....My Best to Karen --- Richmandrake ( Thu, Jun 25, 2009, 01:50:46 ) (39 reads) ( 1259 bytes )

Charanand on fundraising tour in Ashland, Oregon... --- Cynthia ( Sat, Jun 20, 2009, 09:49:07 ) (194 reads) ( 2326 bytes ) +14

Re: Charanand on fundraising tour in Ashland, Oregon... --- 13 ( Sat, Jun 20, 2009, 12:46:23 ) (106 reads) ( 210 bytes )
Charan Anand must be really stupid --- JHB ( Sat, Jun 20, 2009, 13:57:46 ) (156 reads) ( 517 bytes ) +2
- Re: Charan Anand must be really stupid --- Old Timer ( Sat, Jun 20, 2009, 14:51:17 ) (128 reads) ( 1056 bytes ) +3
  - Re: Charan Anand must be really stupid --- JHB ( Sat, Jun 20, 2009, 16:49:12 ) (115 reads) ( 363 bytes )
  - Re: Charan Anand must be really stupid --- lakeshore ( Sat, Jun 20, 2009, 17:33:24 ) (123 reads) ( 1478 bytes ) +1
    - Re: Thanks for your encouragement and answers about charanand --- old Timer ( Sun, Jun 21, 2009, 03:22:41 ) (92 reads) ( 5268 bytes ) +2
      - Re: Thanks for your encouragement and answers about charanand --- Jethro ( Sun, Jun 21, 2009, 04:49:39 ) (86 reads) ( 324 bytes )
      - Re: Thanks for your encouragement and answers about charanand --- lakeshore ( Sun, Jun 21, 2009, 07:58:43 ) (97 reads) ( 5377 bytes ) +2
        
        LS, will you please write a book? --- karenl ( Sun, Jun 21, 2009, 09:43:42 ) (59 reads) ( 462 bytes )
        Re: Thanks for your encouragement and answers about charanand --- old Timer ( Sun, Jun 21, 2009, 10:50:49 ) (70 reads) ( 431 bytes ) +1
        
        Thank you, Old Timer! --- lakeshore ( Sun, Jun 21, 2009, 14:22:33 ) (70 reads) ( 2171 bytes ) link
  - Re: It's really simple - in his own words --- ocker ( Sat, Jun 20, 2009, 19:15:01 ) (89 reads) ( 441 bytes ) link file img
- Re: Charan Anand must be really stupid --- Jethro ( Sat, Jun 20, 2009, 15:18:18 ) (122 reads) ( 375 bytes ) +1
  - 3 times, to be precise --- Ash ( Sat, Jun 20, 2009, 17:10:17 ) (98 reads) ( 261 bytes )