Should Ocker be allowed to post? --- JHB ( Wed, May 08, 2013, 19:08:24 ) (414 reads) ( 703 bytes ) +109
|
I miss his fire --- karenl ( Wed, May 08, 2013, 21:08:03 ) (161 reads) ( 899 bytes ) img
- I vote yes! NT --- Kelly ( Thu, May 09, 2013, 04:45:16 ) (82 reads) ( 2 bytes )
- Yes - but as long as he agrees to start work on his 'Journey'! (nt) (no text) --- cq ( Thu, May 09, 2013, 06:56:07 ) (64 reads) ( 0 bytes )
Yes, but ... --- 13 ( Thu, May 09, 2013, 07:52:01 ) (146 reads) ( 512 bytes )
- Re: Should Ocker be allowed to post? --- newdawn ( Thu, May 09, 2013, 08:13:58 ) (186 reads) ( 1341 bytes ) +1
- I agree with everything Newdawn said (no text) --- quirky ( Thu, May 09, 2013, 15:46:43 ) (38 reads) ( 0 bytes )
- A prior question is: What is the purpose of this Forum? --- Mike Finch ( Thu, May 09, 2013, 09:07:29 ) (208 reads) ( 1031 bytes ) +2
fence sitters are wimps! (nt) --- aunt bea ( Thu, May 09, 2013, 17:10:10 ) (78 reads) ( 2 bytes ) +1
- it is uncomfortable sitting on a fence too (no text) --- Mike Finch ( Thu, May 09, 2013, 19:05:29 ) (45 reads) ( 0 bytes )
- Re: A prior question is: What is the purpose of this Forum? --- JHB ( Fri, May 10, 2013, 01:54:04 ) (130 reads) ( 147 bytes ) +1
- Yes 'both', but.... --- Mike Finch ( Fri, May 10, 2013, 07:15:58 ) (152 reads) ( 1020 bytes ) +1
- Re: Should Ocker be allowed to post? --- swimming free ( Thu, May 09, 2013, 11:40:00 ) (176 reads) ( 130 bytes )
- I vote no --- aunt bea ( Thu, May 09, 2013, 12:17:54 ) (148 reads) ( 1601 bytes ) +1
- I vote yes --- PatD ( Thu, May 09, 2013, 15:31:47 ) (156 reads) ( 2501 bytes ) img +1
- Re: Should Ocker be allowed to post? --- Cynthia ( Thu, May 09, 2013, 13:32:33 ) (146 reads) ( 707 bytes )
- I vote yes --- Poul ( Thu, May 09, 2013, 13:34:06 ) (131 reads) ( 103 bytes ) link
- Re: Should Ocker be allowed to post? --- lakeshore ( Thu, May 09, 2013, 15:11:29 ) (124 reads) ( 554 bytes )
- Re: Should Ocker be allowed to post? my vote is yes --- lesley ( Thu, May 09, 2013, 15:59:12 ) (124 reads) ( 1549 bytes ) img
- PS John. --- aunt bea ( Thu, May 09, 2013, 17:31:37 ) (146 reads) ( 446 bytes ) +2
- I agree. This forum is not slow. --- Steve ( Thu, May 09, 2013, 19:54:53 ) (134 reads) ( 349 bytes )
- I would say no --- anthony ( Fri, May 10, 2013, 03:23:03 ) (198 reads) ( 2629 bytes ) +2
- great post anthony --- aunt bea ( Fri, May 10, 2013, 06:05:08 ) (132 reads) ( 65 bytes ) +1
- Re: great post anthony --- swimming free ( Fri, May 10, 2013, 10:22:05 ) (151 reads) ( 287 bytes ) +1
- forum five --- lesley ( Fri, May 10, 2013, 16:02:09 ) (119 reads) ( 963 bytes )
- Re: I would say no --- 13 ( Fri, May 10, 2013, 11:45:47 ) (143 reads) ( 803 bytes ) +3
- Yes! Go Ocker!! --- sulla ( Sat, May 11, 2013, 11:29:58 ) (117 reads) ( 773 bytes )
- Re: Should Ocker be allowed to post? --- PatD ( Sat, May 11, 2013, 19:15:03 ) (128 reads) ( 176 bytes ) link img +3
- Thanks for the link Pat (OT) --- aunt bea ( Sun, May 12, 2013, 03:17:12 ) (70 reads) ( 667 bytes )
- Re: Should Ocker be allowed to post? --- sulla ( Sun, May 12, 2013, 20:17:12 ) (79 reads) ( 122 bytes )
- Ah, Diogenes.. --- anthony ( Mon, May 13, 2013, 03:20:06 ) (75 reads) ( 3695 bytes )
- about closure healing and justice --- aunt bea ( Sat, May 11, 2013, 21:03:56 ) (120 reads) ( 2141 bytes ) +3
- Re: about closure healing and justice --- lesley ( Sat, May 11, 2013, 22:57:23 ) (97 reads) ( 891 bytes ) img
- Re: about closure healing and justice --- 13 ( Sun, May 12, 2013, 02:20:52 ) (96 reads) ( 2538 bytes ) +1
- Re: about closure healing and justice --- aunt bea ( Sun, May 12, 2013, 03:01:36 ) (93 reads) ( 1567 bytes ) +2
- addendum --- aunt bea ( Sun, May 12, 2013, 03:52:13 ) (97 reads) ( 446 bytes ) +2
- Re: addendum --- 13 ( Sun, May 12, 2013, 04:59:06 ) (83 reads) ( 210 bytes )
- Re: addendum --- anthony ( Sun, May 12, 2013, 06:25:47 ) (84 reads) ( 5567 bytes )
- Re: about closure healing and justice --- 13 ( Sun, May 12, 2013, 04:05:47 ) (105 reads) ( 620 bytes ) +2
- I vote no ...... --- college ( Sun, May 12, 2013, 05:32:00 ) (102 reads) ( 204 bytes ) +1
- Re: I vote no ...... --- lesley ( Sun, May 12, 2013, 07:29:39 ) (126 reads) ( 2352 bytes ) +1
- I am no longer on the fence - I vote No (unless....) --- Mike Finch ( Sun, May 12, 2013, 09:34:52 ) (166 reads) ( 2606 bytes ) +3
- Re: I am no longer on the fence - I vote No (unless....) --- anthony ( Sun, May 12, 2013, 12:16:27 ) (119 reads) ( 1545 bytes ) +1
- Ocker was a premie, but not in the ashram (no text) --- Mike Finch ( Sun, May 12, 2013, 12:20:06 ) (52 reads) ( 0 bytes ) +1
- Re: I am no longer on the fence - I vote No (unless....) --- lesley ( Mon, May 13, 2013, 01:57:56 ) (90 reads) ( 1040 bytes ) img +1
- Actually, Mike... --- anthony ( Mon, May 13, 2013, 09:45:04 ) (97 reads) ( 2791 bytes ) +1
- failure of the imagination! --- aunt bea ( Sun, May 12, 2013, 09:30:40 ) (106 reads) ( 1610 bytes ) +1
Thick skin is necessary to be learned... --- Cynthia ( Sun, May 12, 2013, 12:12:32 ) (116 reads) ( 1842 bytes ) +1
- Re: Should Ocker be allowed to post? --- swimming free ( Sun, May 12, 2013, 21:56:48 ) (155 reads) ( 2210 bytes ) +3
Thanks Roger, NT --- karenl ( Mon, May 13, 2013, 03:14:17 ) (48 reads) ( 2 bytes )
- yes, thank you Roger --- lesley ( Mon, May 13, 2013, 04:12:43 ) (76 reads) ( 318 bytes )
- The pendulum swings --- Kelly ( Mon, May 13, 2013, 06:17:14 ) (112 reads) ( 1488 bytes ) +1
- Re: The pendulum swings --- Mike Finch ( Mon, May 13, 2013, 11:49:17 ) (121 reads) ( 1037 bytes ) +1
- Uh for the record --- Jim ( Mon, May 13, 2013, 12:23:32 ) (137 reads) ( 877 bytes ) +2
Talk of the devil! --- Kelly ( Mon, May 13, 2013, 12:39:21 ) (132 reads) ( 640 bytes ) +1
- I can --- aunt bea ( Mon, May 13, 2013, 13:01:02 ) (123 reads) ( 816 bytes ) +2
- I don't know --- Angela ( Tue, May 14, 2013, 02:42:10 ) (88 reads) ( 843 bytes ) +2
- Re: I don't know --- tommo ( Tue, May 14, 2013, 07:24:05 ) (92 reads) ( 152 bytes )
- Re: I don't know --- lakeshore ( Tue, May 14, 2013, 11:56:26 ) (72 reads) ( 89 bytes )
- Re: Should Ocker be allowed to post? --- tommo ( Tue, May 14, 2013, 07:21:29 ) (75 reads) ( 843 bytes ) +1
- I vote yes, with a 'leave the new posters well alone' proviso (no text) --- Steve ( Tue, May 14, 2013, 09:49:28 ) (54 reads) ( 0 bytes )
- Re: Should Ocker be allowed to post? --- Iola ( Tue, May 14, 2013, 10:00:59 ) (92 reads) ( 225 bytes ) +1
- I wonder what Ocker's thoughts are of this thread? (no text) --- Mike Finch ( Fri, May 17, 2013, 07:57:34 ) (33 reads) ( 0 bytes ) +1
|
|