Re: The logic of "maybe"
Re: The logic of "maybe" -- Jerry	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: Andries ® 07/11/2005, 13:52:45 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

To me it sounds like that Rawat wanted his followers believe in his divinity without taking responsibility for this belief by avoiding unambigious claims. Andries

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Re: The logic of "maybe" --- Tom Gubler ( Mon, Jul 11, 2005, 15:40:07 ) ( 1225 bytes ) +1 I think what angers exes most is that Rawat's behind it --- Jim ( Mon, Jul 11, 2005, 16:33:21 ) ( 224 bytes ) +1 Re: Well you're the anger expert --- Tom Gubler ( Mon, Jul 11, 2005, 17:37:44 ) ( 721 bytes ) +2 Why thank you! --- Jim ( Mon, Jul 11, 2005, 18:30:27 ) ( 239 bytes ) Not quite my position, Tom --- JHB ( Mon, Jul 11, 2005, 18:32:29 ) ( 842 bytes ) +1 Re: Many shades in between --- Tom Gubler ( Tue, Jul 12, 2005, 04:27:54 ) ( 1483 bytes ) +1 That's it, Tom, you've got it! --- JHB ( Tue, Jul 12, 2005, 08:48:00 ) ( 862 bytes ) +1 deep thought --- dant ( Tue, Jul 12, 2005, 11:19:46 ) ( 1166 bytes ) The power on innuendo --- shelagh ( Tue, Jul 12, 2005, 10:05:04 ) ( 1663 bytes ) +1 pro choice --- dant ( Tue, Jul 12, 2005, 11:02:56 ) ( 694 bytes ) +1 Re: pro choice --- shelagh ( Tue, Jul 12, 2005, 14:35:06 ) ( 343 bytes )