Top 10 reasons..... people get into M
			Forum

Posted by: Danny ® 05/14/2005, 19:37:33 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

OK.... I will probably be scorned for this.... hehehe... but here goes; I was pondering... (hmm) that if someone that is beginning to look into m or k through keys or whatever, came in here to see what this site is all about.... wouldn't it be helpful for them, rather than just post what some have called opinions or negative comments...to list what brought each of us to m? Perhaps by defining the motivation.... those that may embark on the process of k or m perhaps will gain insight into their own motives and think twice before they allow themselves to get duped. If this topic is dumb... I am sure it will die a quiet death on it's own! My #1 reason for becoming a premie was ... ... given my perspective at the time, I was earnestly seeking a higher truth, a sense of reason to why things are the way they are... having rejected superstitions and religions... and having seen my best and closest friend receive k and was amazed at the transformation in him... his 'glow' and hearing from m some 'key' words that triggered a reaction that I recognized inside me as making sense...I gave it a try! YOUR TURN..... hehehe

Previous

Recommend View All Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Go with the glow --- Neville B ( Sun, May 15, 2005, 07:43:56 ) ( 344 bytes ) Original message ---   ( Sun, May 15, 2005, 14:56:55 ) ( bytes ) +2 How to get those smiley faces..... --- Lexy ( Sun, May 15, 2005, 14:56:55 ) ( 282 bytes ) Again with the religion! --- Danny ( Sun, May 15, 2005, 18:54:06 ) ( 1504 bytes ) link +1 Re: Again with the religion! --- Lexy ( Sun, May 15, 2005, 19:07:08 ) ( 413 bytes ) Re: Top 10 reasons..... people get into M --- bear ( Sun, May 15, 2005, 22:53:32 ) ( 327 bytes ) I knew there were states of grace that could be triggered --- hamzen ( Mon, May 16, 2005, 07:08:39 ) ( 348 bytes ) +1 Hey, me too --- Jim ( Mon, May 16, 2005, 07:23:47 ) ( 113 bytes ) +1 (OT) To Jim and Ham - Re: Primal Scream - too old or too young? --- JHB ( Mon, May 16, 2005, 16:45:51 ) ( 59 bytes ) +2 Latvian humour eh --- hamzen ( Mon, May 16, 2005, 17:29:41 ) ( 234 bytes ) Yes, Ham, you're right. That was very hurtful, John --- Jim ( Tue, May 17, 2005, 15:22:45 ) ( 13 bytes ) +1 Re: Yes, Ham, you're right. That was very hurtful, John (no text) --- Jim ( Tue, May 17, 2005, 16:10:05 ) ( 0 bytes ) Original message ---   ( Mon, May 16, 2005, 11:48:36 ) ( bytes ) +2 Hopefully, you have discovered that it is a forum for...... --- NAR ( Mon, May 16, 2005, 11:48:36 ) ( 3113 bytes ) +1 For gawd's sake Nar....... --- Lexy ( Mon, May 16, 2005, 14:05:50 ) ( 27 bytes ) +1 I wrote a follow-on post, but it didn't save properly....... --- NAR ( Tue, May 17, 2005, 10:35:12 ) ( 747 bytes ) +1 The fraud itself.......... --- Lexy ( Tue, May 17, 2005, 11:12:43 ) ( 671 bytes ) +1 LOL... Lexy you got me! --- NAR ( Tue, May 17, 2005, 11:36:07 ) ( 401 bytes ) img Hi, Susie --- Tempora ( Mon, May 16, 2005, 14:26:18 ) ( 839 bytes ) +2 Check the god spot and Michael Persingers research --- hamzen ( Tue, May 17, 2005, 09:38:31 ) ( 802 bytes ) +1 Uh, Hammy can you provide refs for this statement? --- gerry ( Tue, May 17, 2005, 10:05:54 ) ( 189 bytes ) +1 Gerry, read Sagan --- NAR ( Tue, May 17, 2005, 10:21:03 ) ( 1055 bytes ) +2 I've read Sagan (OT) --- gerry ( Tue, May 17, 2005, 11:07:27 ) ( 2006 bytes ) +1 Re: I've read Sagan (OT) --- Cynthia ( Tue, May 17, 2005, 11:21:29 ) ( 471 bytes ) +1 Re: I've read Sagan (OT) --- gerry ( Tue, May 17, 2005, 11:32:56 ) ( 600 bytes ) +1 What reality, Gerry? (OT) --- NAR ( Tue, May 17, 2005, 11:52:20 ) ( 2181 bytes ) +1 You won't explore the evidence --- gerry ( Tue, May 17, 2005, 12:08:05 ) ( 610 bytes ) +2 Polite request --- Euro Mod ( Tue, May 17, 2005, 12:19:42 ) ( 534 bytes ) link +1 Yessir...... sorry about that (no text) --- NAR ( Tue, May 17, 2005, 12:23:18 ) ( 0 bytes ) There isn't any "evidence," Gerry (OT) --- NAR ( Tue, May 17, 2005, 12:20:39 ) ( 1766 bytes ) +1 Yes there is, including "trace" physical evidence (no text) --- gerry ( Tue, May 17, 2005, 12:48:54 ) ( 0 bytes ) Also, NAR --- gerry ( Tue, May 17, 2005, 11:54:27 ) ( 63 bytes ) +1 Not true....(OT) --- NAR ( Tue, May 17, 2005, 12:09:24 ) ( 2418 bytes ) +1 Ridiculous...or as you say "rediculous" --- gerry ( Tue, May 17, 2005, 12:25:13 ) ( 808 bytes ) +1 Go ahead..... pick on a typo rather than deal with the content --- NAR ( Tue, May 17, 2005, 12:53:00 ) ( 1119 bytes ) +1 I've been dealing with content all along --- gerry ( Tue, May 17, 2005, 13:06:46 ) ( 859 bytes ) +1 Gerry, we've been asked to take this elsewhere --- NAR ( Tue, May 17, 2005, 13:20:08 ) ( 115 bytes ) +1 A High Noon challenge if I ever saw one... (no text) --- Neville B ( Tue, May 17, 2005, 19:24:05 ) ( 0 bytes ) Uhhhhhh....... --- NAR ( Tue, May 17, 2005, 10:13:36 ) ( 1320 bytes ) The embarrasing truth --- NAR ( Tue, May 17, 2005, 10:29:20 ) ( 815 bytes ) +2 That's so cute , Nar. (nt) (no text) --- Lexy ( Tue, May 17, 2005, 17:20:46 ) ( 0 bytes ) There's a white mare on the farm next door that foundered last year --- gerry ( Sun, May 22, 2005, 22:24:46 ) ( 252 bytes )