So Andries, just because date-raped women have not pressed legal charges, you completely discredit Dettmer's recollections! Does Rawat need to wave their panties in front of your nose, Andries, for you to be "impressed"? Rawat probably still has them, sick bastard that he is.

Andries, I don't get it. To my knowledge, this forum is not a court of law; meaning, Rawat is not ipso facto innocent until proven guilty.

For example, it is a known fact that Rawat benefitted from free labor, breaking every known labor law in the United States. But, since Rawat has never been convicted of employing small armies of workers at below minimum wage, are you seriously going to insist that these labor allegations are false?

Likewise, it seems inappropriate to discount Dettmer's recollections just because those women are unafraid to come forward.

[OT, still waiting for you to acknowledge your unusual choice of phrase above]