|
|
|
|||
|
| Re: ah |  | ||
| Re: Re: ah -- meryl | Top of thread | Post Reply | Forum |
|
Hi Rod, Well, how nice! A pleasant, thoughtful response from some ex-premie who wants to have a reasonable exchange of information and ideas. I'd blow you a kiss but I don't want to get carried away. Not really my thing anyway, to be honest. So just tell me this -- you say you're not interested in debating my boy, Trump but then throw out a whole bunch of stuff almost as if you did want to talk about him so, what should I do? I'm prepared to cut and paste and respond to everything you've said but first will you then follow through and talk with me? You're wrong about almost everything, not quite all, but most of it and I'm happy to set you straight. It's just that hot-and-cold will-talk, won't-talk thing you get so much from all you guys so often that confuses me. Here's a teaser though: I get my information from lots of places, all of the regular leftist and msm sources but then so much more too. I'm a news junkie I guess you could say. How about you? Wherever I get my news must be a better collection of feeds, though, as unlike you I don't mistakenly think Trump was convicted of rape or fraud or stealing classified documents, voter fraud or insurrection. Do you really think all that or is that just how you roll when you get excited? And do you really think that Trump opened the door for Iran to go nuclear -- oh my god, that's breathtaking. And millions he made as president? What the hell are you talking about? You must mean something but that one just leaves me scratching my head. And the election fraud question from 2020, do you seriously think that that issue was substantively vetted in any case? Which one? Where? They were all dismissed procedurally as far as I know but perhaps you have one or two in mind I haven't heard of. But hey, let's just look at the New York trial, shall we? The current one, not the Lateita James travesty which we can also consider, sure, but, no, how about the current one. Here's the question -- do you think it's fair and reasonable? Is Trump afforded due process? What do you know about it anyway? Anything? Tell me this -- is the legal basis for the felony charges well-founded? Is the judge unencumbered by at minimum an apprehension of bias? What does it mean that some state judge is restricting the Republican presidential candidate to his New York courtroom almost as if on house arrest for the next couple of months? Is that all fair to you? Tell me as well, do you think that the Biden admin is coordinating any of these prosecutions? What would that mean if so? Or maybe you couldn't care less? Let's go, Roddy!  |
| Previous | Current page | Next |
| Replies to this message |
|
