Re: or possible cognitive dissonance?
Re: or possible cognitive dissonance? -- cq	Top of thread	Post Reply	Forum

Posted by: PatD ® 02/17/2017, 22:08:26 Author Profile Edit Alert Forum Admin Post Reply

He obviously didn't want to answer that question for whatever reason, maybe he thought it irrelevant, but not being a skilled political practitioner, he made an awfully gruesome exit. As he was elected by people who are sick to the back teeth of that sort though, maybe it doesn't matter. Cancelling the 2 state 'solution' is a welcome acceptance of the fact that there is no solution. As someone who would like to see Israel expand into the territory of the original mandate, this is an obstacle removed. What juvenile tossers (your link) think about it doesn't cut any ice with me.

Previous

Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Re: or possible cognitive dissonance? --- snow-white ( Sat, Feb 18, 2017, 22:02:13 ) ( 111 bytes ) +2 Re: or possible cognitive dissonance? --- cq ( Sun, Feb 19, 2017, 10:14:09 ) ( 292 bytes ) the greater good --- PatD ( Mon, Feb 20, 2017, 17:00:29 ) ( 453 bytes ) +2 Re: the greater good --- snow-white ( Tue, Feb 21, 2017, 00:10:40 ) ( 101 bytes ) Re: expansion to benefit? --- auggie55 ( Tue, Feb 21, 2017, 07:22:28 ) ( 637 bytes ) +1 Re: expansion to benefit? --- snow-white ( Tue, Feb 21, 2017, 22:33:49 ) ( 84 bytes ) +1 Re: expansion to benefit? --- auggie55 ( Wed, Feb 22, 2017, 01:04:58 ) ( 49 bytes ) +1 Re: expansion to benefit? --- snow-white ( Wed, Feb 22, 2017, 09:58:38 ) ( 935 bytes ) +1 Re: expansion to benefit? --- PatD ( Fri, Feb 24, 2017, 18:01:28 ) ( 171 bytes ) +2 Re: expansion to benefit? --- snow-white ( Fri, Feb 24, 2017, 22:34:00 ) ( 248 bytes ) Then you agree with me --- snow-white ( Sat, Feb 25, 2017, 03:21:48 ) ( 117 bytes ) +1 not really --- PatD ( Sun, Feb 26, 2017, 12:17:05 ) ( 177 bytes )