How foolish to get lead around by the nose that way
Re: I would no sooner click on a Breitbart link than I would subscribe to the National Enquirer -- cq	Top of thread	Post Reply	Forum

Posted by: Jim ® 01/10/2017, 12:36:09 Author Profile Edit Alert Forum Admin Post Reply

Previous

Current page

Next

Replies to this message

There are many that would say the same of you. Viz ... --- cq ( Tue, Jan 10, 2017, 14:10:12 ) ( 229 bytes ) +1 Do you have any sense of how absurd you're being? --- Jim ( Tue, Jan 10, 2017, 15:01:57 ) ( 107 bytes ) +1 I'd say your claim that the German police are lying is spurious too. Evidence? (no text) --- cq ( Tue, Jan 10, 2017, 17:16:48 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1 How would you know? Hahaha - you have to look, silly! --- Jim ( Tue, Jan 10, 2017, 17:28:52 ) ( 404 bytes ) link +1 And here's one for you, laughing boy (yawn) --- cq ( Tue, Jan 10, 2017, 17:57:13 ) ( 88 bytes ) link +1 HUH??? --- Jim ( Tue, Jan 10, 2017, 18:27:00 ) ( 6 bytes ) +1 Re: HUH??? link fixed --- cq ( Wed, Jan 11, 2017, 13:26:33 ) ( 192 bytes ) link +1 What I'm questioning is what that proves --- Jim ( Wed, Jan 11, 2017, 14:25:15 ) ( 9 bytes ) +1 Just keeping track of the pre-inauguration score-card. (no text) --- cq ( Thu, Jan 12, 2017, 09:49:14 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1 Are you keeping track of the lying media too? --- Jim ( Tue, Jan 17, 2017, 12:59:33 ) ( 149 bytes ) link +2 Re: Are you keeping track of the lying media too? --- auggie55 ( Tue, Jan 17, 2017, 13:48:06 ) ( 161 bytes ) +1 Relevance? --- Jim ( Tue, Jan 17, 2017, 14:34:47 ) ( 2 bytes ) +1 Re: Relevance? --- auggie55 ( Tue, Jan 17, 2017, 15:35:59 ) ( 225 bytes ) +1 Re: Relevance? --- Jim ( Tue, Jan 17, 2017, 16:23:54 ) ( 94 bytes ) +1 Re: Relevance? --- auggie55 ( Tue, Jan 17, 2017, 19:21:37 ) ( 199 bytes ) +1 Re: Relevance? --- Jim ( Tue, Jan 17, 2017, 19:54:37 ) ( 66 bytes ) +1 Re: Relevance? --- auggie55 ( Tue, Jan 17, 2017, 20:00:41 ) ( 413 bytes ) lying media, you say? --- cq ( Sun, Jan 22, 2017, 12:55:14 ) ( 207 bytes ) link img