Re: Lesley, is this close to home?

Re: Lesley, is this close to home?
Re: Lesley, is this close to home? -- Jim	Top of thread	Post Reply	Forum

Posted by:
lesley ^Ž

01/04/2017, 14:37:20
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin

Post Reply

okay well I couldn't view it on jihadwatch without clicking on a subscribe pop-up so I went to google. there were 4 news sites with the story. One was jihadwatch, the other was called Shoebat and was for Christians, then there was a site run by a soldier and the other was some I dunno what. It was the worst. But it did agree with Shoebat that it was just husband and wife. In the other two there was a daughter, and then daughters in the plural involved as well.

No mainstream media with the story came up on Google so I went searching the ABC no they haven't covered the story at all. And yet I would have thought it would have been on all the news channels here, that's a big news item.

So now I'm not even sure if the story is true but I am certainly prepared to believe it could have happened.

I am grateful to have been born in England.

I am also prepared to believe tho, that there are some muslims who make good husbands - I'm prepared to believe that of all humanity.

Current page

Replies to this message

Re: Lesley, is this close to home? --- PatD ( Wed, Jan 04, 2017, 15:47:17 ) ( 1046 bytes ) +1

Re: Lesley, is this close to home? --- lesley ( Wed, Jan 04, 2017, 21:26:22 ) ( 280 bytes ) img +1

Could be, but how can we be sure any more? --- cq ( Sun, Jan 08, 2017, 04:34:29 ) ( 522 bytes ) link +1

The police are lying --- Jim ( Sun, Jan 08, 2017, 12:20:32 ) ( 459 bytes ) +2

The American media's not much better --- Jim ( Sun, Jan 08, 2017, 12:34:33 ) ( 245 bytes ) +1

Re: The American media's not much better --- auggie55 ( Mon, Jan 09, 2017, 11:19:27 ) ( 126 bytes ) +1

As usual you probably didn't bother to look at the evidence --- Jim ( Mon, Jan 09, 2017, 11:55:50 ) ( 2 bytes ) +1

Re: evidence --- auggie55 ( Mon, Jan 09, 2017, 16:35:56 ) ( 853 bytes ) +1

Are YOU mentally ill? --- Jim ( Mon, Jan 09, 2017, 17:24:50 ) ( 76 bytes ) +1

Re: Fake news --- auggie55 ( Mon, Jan 09, 2017, 17:46:53 ) ( 492 bytes )

And Breitbart itself responds to the accusations --- Jim ( Sun, Jan 08, 2017, 17:57:11 ) ( 409 bytes ) link +1

And watch how dangerously the MSM uses their fake news! --- Jim ( Mon, Jan 09, 2017, 09:14:47 ) ( 287 bytes ) link +1

I would no sooner click on a Breitbart link than I would subscribe to the Nat... --- cq ( Tue, Jan 10, 2017, 11:51:32 ) ( 123 bytes ) +1

How foolish to get lead around by the nose that way --- Jim ( Tue, Jan 10, 2017, 12:36:09 ) ( 6 bytes ) +1

There are many that would say the same of you. Viz ... --- cq ( Tue, Jan 10, 2017, 14:10:12 ) ( 229 bytes ) +1

Do you have any sense of how absurd you're being? --- Jim ( Tue, Jan 10, 2017, 15:01:57 ) ( 107 bytes ) +1

I'd say your claim that the German police are lying is spurious too. Evidence? (no text) --- cq ( Tue, Jan 10, 2017, 17:16:48 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1

How would you know? Hahaha - you have to look, silly! --- Jim ( Tue, Jan 10, 2017, 17:28:52 ) ( 404 bytes ) link +1

And here's one for you, laughing boy (yawn) --- cq ( Tue, Jan 10, 2017, 17:57:13 ) ( 88 bytes ) link +1

HUH??? --- Jim ( Tue, Jan 10, 2017, 18:27:00 ) ( 6 bytes ) +1

Re: HUH??? link fixed --- cq ( Wed, Jan 11, 2017, 13:26:33 ) ( 192 bytes ) link +1

What I'm questioning is what that proves --- Jim ( Wed, Jan 11, 2017, 14:25:15 ) ( 9 bytes ) +1

Just keeping track of the pre-inauguration score-card. (no text) --- cq ( Thu, Jan 12, 2017, 09:49:14 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1

Are you keeping track of the lying media too? --- Jim ( Tue, Jan 17, 2017, 12:59:33 ) ( 149 bytes ) link +2

Re: Are you keeping track of the lying media too? --- auggie55 ( Tue, Jan 17, 2017, 13:48:06 ) ( 161 bytes ) +1

Relevance? --- Jim ( Tue, Jan 17, 2017, 14:34:47 ) ( 2 bytes ) +1

Re: Relevance? --- auggie55 ( Tue, Jan 17, 2017, 15:35:59 ) ( 225 bytes ) +1

Re: Relevance? --- Jim ( Tue, Jan 17, 2017, 16:23:54 ) ( 94 bytes ) +1

Re: Relevance? --- auggie55 ( Tue, Jan 17, 2017, 19:21:37 ) ( 199 bytes ) +1

Re: Relevance? --- Jim ( Tue, Jan 17, 2017, 19:54:37 ) ( 66 bytes ) +1

Re: Relevance? --- auggie55 ( Tue, Jan 17, 2017, 20:00:41 ) ( 413 bytes )

lying media, you say? --- cq ( Sun, Jan 22, 2017, 12:55:14 ) ( 207 bytes ) link img

Re: Lesley, is this close to home? --- Jim ( Thu, Jan 05, 2017, 08:26:13 ) ( 839 bytes ) +1

Re: Lesley, is this close to home? --- lesley ( Thu, Jan 05, 2017, 13:18:10 ) ( 684 bytes ) +1

Flat wrong, Lesley --- Jim ( Thu, Jan 05, 2017, 16:08:24 ) ( 228 bytes ) +2

The article --- Jim ( Thu, Jan 05, 2017, 16:43:00 ) ( 7629 bytes ) link img
fake news? --- lesley ( Fri, Jan 06, 2017, 13:25:03 ) ( 300 bytes ) +1

"Yucky article"? "Stuff you"? Nice. --- Jim ( Sat, Jan 07, 2017, 11:23:27 ) ( 2 bytes ) +1

yeah that's right, Jim --- lesley ( Sat, Jan 07, 2017, 15:03:21 ) ( 1040 bytes ) +1

What was sensationalized about it? --- Jim ( Sun, Jan 08, 2017, 12:28:38 ) ( 114 bytes ) +1

Re: What was sensationalized about it? --- lesley ( Mon, Jan 09, 2017, 14:07:59 ) ( 766 bytes ) +1

Did you actually say that???? --- Jim ( Mon, Jan 09, 2017, 18:14:26 ) ( 380 bytes ) +1

indeed I did --- lesley ( Mon, Jan 09, 2017, 21:10:19 ) ( 140 bytes ) +1

How utterly stupid! --- Jim ( Mon, Jan 09, 2017, 22:05:45 ) ( 234 bytes ) +1

Re: How utterly stupid! --- lesley ( Tue, Jan 10, 2017, 17:34:00 ) ( 450 bytes ) +1

How many points make a pattern? --- Jim ( Tue, Jan 10, 2017, 19:02:12 ) ( 299 bytes ) link +2

Re: How many points make a pattern? --- auggie55 ( Tue, Jan 10, 2017, 20:00:59 ) ( 86 bytes ) +1

Re: How many points make a pattern? --- Jim ( Tue, Jan 10, 2017, 21:25:11 ) ( 255 bytes ) link +1

Re: Thanks, good article, though heavily slanted --- auggie55 ( Tue, Jan 10, 2017, 22:48:02 ) ( 1333 bytes ) +1

Have you read ANYTHING to educate yourself about Islam yet? --- Jim ( Wed, Jan 11, 2017, 14:45:18 ) ( 126 bytes ) +1

Re: Have you read ANYTHING to educate yourself about Islam yet? --- auggie55 ( Wed, Jan 11, 2017, 19:21:04 ) ( 278 bytes )

Re: How many points make a pattern? --- lesley ( Wed, Jan 11, 2017, 12:43:01 ) ( 421 bytes ) +1

December 17, 2016 --- Jim ( Wed, Jan 11, 2017, 14:29:01 ) ( 297 bytes ) link +1

Re: December 17, 2016 --- lesley ( Wed, Jan 11, 2017, 15:04:23 ) ( 290 bytes ) +1

Re: December 17, 2016 --- Jim ( Wed, Jan 11, 2017, 15:43:50 ) ( 538 bytes ) +1

Re: December 17, 2016 --- lesley ( Thu, Jan 12, 2017, 02:45:05 ) ( 532 bytes ) +1

Both you and Auggie55 are confused about this --- Jim ( Thu, Jan 12, 2017, 11:06:22 ) ( 691 bytes ) +2

Re: Both you and Auggie55 are confused about this --- auggie55 ( Thu, Jan 12, 2017, 15:22:04 ) ( 916 bytes ) +1

Re: Both you and Auggie55 are confused about this --- Jim ( Thu, Jan 12, 2017, 16:32:18 ) ( 645 bytes ) link +1

Re: Both you and Auggie55 are confused about this --- auggie55 ( Thu, Jan 12, 2017, 17:25:41 ) ( 217 bytes )

oh boy, Jim --- lesley ( Fri, Jan 13, 2017, 12:09:39 ) ( 1878 bytes ) img +1

So do you think I'm wrong? --- Jim ( Fri, Jan 13, 2017, 13:49:41 ) ( 429 bytes ) +1

Re: So do you think I'm wrong? --- lesley ( Fri, Jan 13, 2017, 17:01:11 ) ( 1015 bytes ) img +1

Re: So do you think I'm wrong? --- Jim ( Fri, Jan 13, 2017, 22:12:35 ) ( 246 bytes ) +2

Can't you see it? --- Jim ( Fri, Jan 13, 2017, 23:07:16 ) ( 330 bytes ) link +1

yes I can see it. --- lesley ( Sat, Jan 14, 2017, 17:58:01 ) ( 202 bytes )

God, Jim --- lesley ( Sat, Jan 14, 2017, 17:53:52 ) ( 148 bytes ) +1

Re: God, Jim --- Jim ( Sat, Jan 14, 2017, 19:07:20 ) ( 24 bytes ) +1

thanks, Jim --- lesley ( Sat, Jan 14, 2017, 20:50:32 ) ( 718 bytes ) img +1

Happy Australia Day! --- Jim ( Tue, Jan 17, 2017, 12:44:51 ) ( 291 bytes ) +1

Re: Happy Australia Day! --- lesley ( Tue, Jan 17, 2017, 16:24:00 ) ( 1644 bytes ) +1

Didn't you see the billboard? --- Jim ( Tue, Jan 17, 2017, 16:35:59 ) ( 34 bytes ) +1

what do you want me to say --- lesley ( Tue, Jan 17, 2017, 18:44:54 ) ( 424 bytes )