Prem Rawat Talk Forum - The Keys to Freedom

49585-50140/51084

New Post

Admin

Rawat in Miami on September 26? Events in Las Vegas and Albuquerque --- Old Timer ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 02:06:29 ) ( 162 bytes ) +41

I was wondering the same thing... --- lakeshore ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 09:37:45 ) ( 699 bytes ) +3
- Re: I was wondering the same thing... --- old Timer ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 09:49:41 ) ( 195 bytes ) +1
  - Mitch Ditkoff... again... --- lakeshore ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 12:21:47 ) ( 659 bytes ) +1
    - Another Link to the mystery! --- old Timer ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 14:39:50 ) ( 737 bytes ) link +1
      - Re: Another Link to the mystery! --- shauna ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 00:11:07 ) ( 526 bytes ) +1
        
        It's all about social respectability. --- Jethro ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 03:39:11 ) ( 849 bytes ) link +1
        
        Re: And what he thought about Mata Ji --- ocker ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 06:17:09 ) ( 1764 bytes ) +2
        
        Thanks Ocker... --- turey ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 09:51:20 ) ( 411 bytes )
        Some thoughts about Hans(prem's father) --- Jethro ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 09:55:36 ) ( 1290 bytes ) link +1
        
        Re: Some thoughts about Hans(prem's father) --- ocker ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 11:24:10 ) ( 741 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Some thoughts about Hans(prem's father) --- Jethro ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 11:42:08 ) ( 188 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Some thoughts about Hans(prem's father) --- ocker ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 17:04:58 ) ( 50 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Some thoughts about Hans(prem's father) --- Jethro ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 23:36:51 ) ( 87 bytes )
- One would think that Rawat would keep it as simple as possible?.. --- johnnyboy ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 11:03:26 ) ( 263 bytes )
- Re: I was wondering the same thing... --- emmyj ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 13:31:06 ) ( 436 bytes ) link +3
  - Re: I was wondering the same thing... --- old Timer ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 14:03:53 ) ( 352 bytes ) +1
    - Re: I was wondering the same thing... --- emmyj ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 14:27:12 ) ( 136 bytes ) +1
      - With all due respect emmyj - you should worry... --- johnnyboy ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 15:42:56 ) ( 102 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: With all due respect emmyj - you should worry... --- emmyj ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 16:25:16 ) ( 18 bytes ) +2
        
        Just be very careful, Emmy --- Fiona ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 17:19:24 ) ( 883 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Just be very careful, Emmy --- emmyj ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 17:36:01 ) ( 190 bytes ) +1
        
        Emmyj is Maskedhighwayman..... --- JHB ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 18:54:14 ) ( 133 bytes ) +3
        
        Re: Can we ask a question? --- ocker ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 21:26:13 ) ( 103 bytes ) +1
        
        Good idea! --- Ash ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 23:28:18 ) ( 195 bytes ) +2
        
        Ha - This Guy is such a Swan Vesta!! (no text) --- johnnyboy ( Wed, Oct 07, 2009, 01:29:46 ) ( 0 bytes )
        I've asked him/her --- JHB ( Wed, Oct 07, 2009, 03:00:47 ) ( 37 bytes ) +1
        
        Will you.... --- Ash ( Thu, Oct 08, 2009, 16:30:45 ) ( 95 bytes )
        
        Emmyji! You little tart you!!! --- Fiona ( Wed, Oct 07, 2009, 11:17:53 ) ( 278 bytes )
        Re: Emmyj is Maskedhighwayman..... --- lexy ( Wed, Oct 07, 2009, 13:23:50 ) ( 757 bytes ) +1
        
        Lexy, you CAN voice your doubts --- JHB ( Wed, Oct 07, 2009, 18:13:35 ) ( 50 bytes )
        
        Just take care along this path to 'enlightenment'...... --- johnnyboy ( Wed, Oct 07, 2009, 01:26:59 ) ( 164 bytes )
  - Re: I was wondering the same thing... --- snow-white ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 16:37:13 ) ( 216 bytes )
  - Emmy --- Will ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 16:41:24 ) ( 769 bytes )
Super Funny Maharaji... --- Cynthia ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 15:16:58 ) ( 5178 bytes ) link +3
- Re: Super Funny Maharaji... --- old Timer ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 15:29:13 ) ( 94 bytes )
- I don't follow this at all . . . --- Steve ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 08:11:35 ) ( 229 bytes ) +1
  - Not necessary - it's only premie logic! (no text) --- Ash ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 10:59:52 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1
    - it's only premie logic! --- johnnyboy ( Wed, Oct 07, 2009, 01:39:11 ) ( 86 bytes )
- Re: Super Funny Maharaji... --- snow-white ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 10:19:05 ) ( 703 bytes )
Re: Rawat in Miami on September 26? Events in Las Vegas and Albuquerque --- emmyj ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 13:32:41 ) ( 495 bytes ) link +1
- Re: Rawat in Miami on September 26? Events in Las Vegas and Albuquerque --- old Timer ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 14:06:54 ) ( 460 bytes )

Poet James Kavanaugh Sums Up The 'New Age' --- deprogram anand ji ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 07:52:21 ) ( 2145 bytes ) +48

Re: Poet James Kavanaugh Sums Up The 'New Age' --- deprogram anand ji ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 08:17:44 ) ( 1255 bytes ) +1
- "Or fearfully am not." --- johnnyboy ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 08:26:36 ) ( 259 bytes ) +1
  - Re: "Or fearfully am not." --- deprogram anand ji ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 10:03:14 ) ( 23 bytes )
Please stick to the Forum guidelines --- Mike Finch-Admin ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 11:38:02 ) ( 605 bytes ) link +2
- Re: Please stick to the Forum guidelines --- deprogram anand ji ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 13:28:43 ) ( 221 bytes )
- Re: Please stick to the Forum guidelines --- deprogram anand ji ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 13:51:09 ) ( 285 bytes ) +2
  - what do you mean with suspect ? --- praline ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 14:08:07 ) ( 25 bytes ) +1
    - Re: what do you mean with suspect ? --- deprogram anand ji ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 14:19:54 ) ( 280 bytes ) +2
      - Re: what do you mean with suspect ? --- praline ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 16:00:31 ) ( 20 bytes )
      - Careful... --- Mike Finch-Admin ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 16:56:17 ) ( 960 bytes ) +1
        
        I've banned deprogram anand ji --- JHB ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 19:18:14 ) ( 316 bytes ) +3
        
        Re: I Didn't See That One Coming ... --- ocker ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 21:59:45 ) ( 475 bytes ) +1
        
        It's weird... --- Ash ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 01:33:50 ) ( 820 bytes ) +1
        
        Here's the 'other factor' --- JHB ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 02:37:45 ) ( 557 bytes ) +4
        
        Re: Here's the 'other factor' --- ocker ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 06:11:06 ) ( 132 bytes ) +1
        
        I was tempted to point out your unusually patient dealings with DPA Ocker! (no text) --- johnnyboy ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 09:03:06 ) ( 0 bytes )
        
        I think we can safely say.... --- johnnyboy ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 09:01:21 ) ( 772 bytes )
        Thanks JHB! --- Ash ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 09:41:04 ) ( 102 bytes )
        Loved "sychopants" though - where can I get me some? (no text) --- Fiona ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 11:17:40 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1
        
        Ha - Thanks Fiona - didn't notice that --- johnnyboy ( Wed, Oct 07, 2009, 03:49:58 ) ( 673 bytes )
        
        I always thought he is aoanandji nt (no text) --- Jethro ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 03:55:24 ) ( 0 bytes ) +2
        
        No - he's not (no text) --- JHB ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 04:08:30 ) ( 0 bytes )
        Re: I always thought he is aoanandji --- Cynthia ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 07:06:55 ) ( 563 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: I always thought he is aoanandji --- jool ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 08:07:12 ) ( 472 bytes ) +1
        
        So maybe it is his evil twin --- snow-white ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 10:10:43 ) ( 241 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: So maybe it is his evil twin --- jool ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 10:48:59 ) ( 294 bytes )
        
        Re: I've banned deprogram anand ji --- praline ( Wed, Oct 07, 2009, 04:04:13 ) ( 71 bytes )
  - Not quite dpa! --- Ash ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 14:11:13 ) ( 557 bytes ) +1
    - Re: Not quite dpa! --- deprogram anand ji ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 14:31:17 ) ( 549 bytes ) +3
      - Re: Not quite dpa! --- deprogram anand ji ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 14:46:14 ) ( 47.2 KB ) link +1
        
        Re: Not quite dpa! --- lexy ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 16:52:12 ) ( 1537 bytes ) +2
        
        How about new religious movement... --- Cynthia ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 16:58:38 ) ( 292 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: How about new religious movement... --- lexy ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 11:57:46 ) ( 166 bytes )
        
        DP and deprogram anand ji (dpa) are two different posters (no text) --- Mike Finch ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 17:02:01 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1
        
        ok (no text) --- lexy ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 17:40:07 ) ( 0 bytes )
      - Re: Rawat saw nothing --- ocker ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 15:34:06 ) ( 1135 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Rawat saw nothing --- deprogram anand ji ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 15:53:47 ) ( 601 bytes ) +2
        
        Non non non --- praline ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 16:14:28 ) ( 415 bytes ) +2
        
        Re: Oui oui oui --- ocker ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 16:36:07 ) ( 29 bytes )
        Re: Non non non --- deprogram anand ji ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 16:47:34 ) ( 172 bytes ) +2
        
        Re: Non non non --- lexy ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 17:47:23 ) ( 195 bytes ) +1
        
        Oui ! (no text) --- praline ( Wed, Oct 07, 2009, 04:05:11 ) ( 0 bytes )
        
        Re: Non non non --- ocker ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 17:58:44 ) ( 835 bytes )
        
        Re: Rawat saw nothing --- ocker ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 16:35:08 ) ( 778 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Rawat saw nothing --- deprogram anand ji ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 16:52:25 ) ( 589 bytes ) link +2
        
        Re: Rawat saw nothing --- Cynthia ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 17:00:21 ) ( 98 bytes )
        Re: I'd already rejected K --- ocker ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 18:05:29 ) ( 648 bytes )
      - Re: Not quite dpa! --- Ash ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 17:39:20 ) ( 2125 bytes )

How clean is clean? How perfect is perfect? --- Old Timer ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 00:25:34 ) ( 1156 bytes ) +20

Re: How clean is clean? How perfect is perfect? --- snow-white ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 02:50:49 ) ( 1185 bytes ) +1
- Re: How clean is clean? How perfect is perfect? --- old Timer ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 10:06:35 ) ( 1859 bytes ) +1
  - Re: How clean is clean? How perfect is perfect? --- snow-white ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 10:59:04 ) ( 306 bytes ) img
Re: How clean is clean? How perfect is perfect? MODIFIED --- praline ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 06:12:57 ) ( 1248 bytes ) +2
- Premies painted a donkey coral white? --- lakeshore ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 09:13:26 ) ( 821 bytes ) +1
  - Re: Premies painted a donkey coral white? --- praline ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 10:51:44 ) ( 1097 bytes )
- Re: How clean is clean? How perfect is perfect? MODIFIED --- old Timer ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 10:37:24 ) ( 951 bytes ) +4
  - Re: How clean is clean? How perfect is perfect? MODIFIED --- praline ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 11:12:04 ) ( 793 bytes )
  - Re: How clean is clean? How perfect is perfect? MODIFIED --- Poul ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 11:36:14 ) ( 4428 bytes ) link +2
    - Re: How clean is clean? How perfect is perfect? --- old Timer ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 11:49:37 ) ( 280 bytes )
    - The lock on the prison cell --- lakeshore ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 12:35:55 ) ( 297 bytes )
  - Lingfield --- snow-white ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 11:57:09 ) ( 116 bytes )
  - Re: How clean is clean? How perfect is perfect? MODIFIED --- Jethro ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 13:41:26 ) ( 162 bytes ) +1
    - Re: How clean is clean? How perfect is perfect? MODIFIED --- ocker ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 16:26:43 ) ( 720 bytes )
Re: How clean is clean? How perfect is perfect? --- lakeshore ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 06:19:42 ) ( 3948 bytes ) +1
- Re: How clean is clean? How perfect is perfect? Events. --- old Timer ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 09:44:09 ) ( 1860 bytes )
Re: How clean is clean? How perfect is perfect? --- deprogram anand ji ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 06:52:59 ) ( 73 bytes )
Re: How clean is clean? How perfect is perfect? --- shauna ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 07:59:32 ) ( 484 bytes ) +1
- Re: How clean is clean? How perfect is perfect? --- 13 ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 11:15:53 ) ( 140 bytes ) +1
  - Re: How clean is clean? How perfect is perfect? --- old Timer ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 14:16:38 ) ( 363 bytes )

Are premies "possessed?" An Jungian perspective --- karenl ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 08:55:27 ) ( 12.8 KB ) link +27

Re: Are premies "possessed?" An Jungian perspective --- turey ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 09:40:30 ) ( 430 bytes ) +1
- Re: Are premies "possessed?" An Jungian perspective --- johnnyboy ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 11:04:17 ) ( 1387 bytes ) +1
  - Re: Are premies "possessed?" An Jungian perspective --- karenl ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 11:21:46 ) ( 432 bytes ) +1
    - This is a long read but worthwhile imo... "Scandals, Saints and Self-Cen... --- hilltop ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 17:10:20 ) ( 0 bytes ) file +2
      - The "it hurts" attachment is helpful and I agree with most of it. --- hilltop ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 17:49:20 ) ( 0 bytes ) file +1
        
        Here's some more misc. posts about the scam, along with some truth and humor... --- hilltop ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 20:02:24 ) ( 201 bytes ) file img +1
        
        Thanks, Hilltop, both are fantastic reading (no text) --- snow-white ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 01:18:26 ) ( 0 bytes )
      - A first-rate professional analysis of guru-disciple relationship --- snow-white ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 02:20:28 ) ( 439 bytes ) img +1
        
        Re: A first-rate professional analysis of guru-disciple relationship --- hilltop ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 16:56:29 ) ( 792 bytes )
No...premies are not possessed... --- Cynthia ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 04:55:04 ) ( 2994 bytes ) +1
- Still OT --- snow-white ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 05:01:16 ) ( 166 bytes ) +1
  - Re: Still OT --- Cynthia ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 05:11:48 ) ( 444 bytes ) +1
    - I think it not so OT with respect to Karen's original question --- johnnyboy ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 06:59:15 ) ( 3621 bytes ) +2
      - Re: I think it not so OT with respect to Karen's original question --- Cynthia ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 10:02:19 ) ( 1399 bytes ) link +1
        
        Re: I think it not so OT with respect to Karen's original question --- johnnyboy ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 12:40:20 ) ( 469 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: I think it not so OT with respect to Karen's original question --- Cynthia ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 08:08:27 ) ( 544 bytes )
      - Re: I think it not so OT with respect to Karen's original question --- snow-white ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 10:39:39 ) ( 383 bytes ) link +3
        
        Ronnie Laing --- johnnyboy ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 12:49:49 ) ( 368 bytes )
        Re: I think it not so OT with respect to Karen's original question --- lexy ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 12:52:55 ) ( 607 bytes ) +2
        
        the idea of "double-bind" --- johnnyboy ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 13:28:49 ) ( 725 bytes ) +2
        
        Re: the idea of "double-bind" --- snow-white ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 14:10:02 ) ( 78 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: the idea of "double-bind" --- johnnyboy ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 17:43:10 ) ( 1356 bytes ) img
        
        Re: the idea of "double-bind" ( OT) --- lexy ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 11:26:52 ) ( 1001 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: the idea of "double-bind" ( OT) --- johnnyboy ( Wed, Oct 07, 2009, 07:03:04 ) ( 1256 bytes ) +1
        
        but for many of us in the late sixties /early seventies these ideas were very... --- lexy ( Wed, Oct 07, 2009, 13:56:57 ) ( 737 bytes )
        
        Re: I think it not so OT with respect to Karen's original question --- snow-white ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 13:59:08 ) ( 629 bytes ) img
        
        (OT) The Divided Self Review --- lexy ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 11:53:25 ) ( 207 bytes )

Rawat simply a garden variety dirtbag --- deprogram anand ji ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 07:04:07 ) ( 503 bytes ) +2

Re: Rawat simply a garden variety dirtbag --- johnnyboy ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 08:31:30 ) ( 204 bytes ) +1
- Re: Rawat simply a garden variety dirtbag --- deprogram anand ji ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 09:53:58 ) ( 143 bytes )

We were talking about the space between us all. --- Kelly ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 13:22:37 ) ( 1163 bytes ) +3

Wonderful song! --- Ash ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 16:34:37 ) ( 258 bytes ) +1
- Re: Wonderful song! --- Kelly ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 11:21:02 ) ( 422 bytes ) +1
  - Good idea! --- Ash ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 17:17:22 ) ( 1381 bytes )

Messages from bleedinghearts whoops breathinghearts --- ocker ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 06:29:47 ) ( 6380 bytes ) +27

It's typical, Ocker... --- Cynthia ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 06:54:28 ) ( 1643 bytes ) +1
- and of course Cynthia..... --- johnnyboy ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 07:25:39 ) ( 637 bytes )
Re: Messages from bleedinghearts whoops breathinghearts --- johnnyboy ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 07:12:29 ) ( 1310 bytes ) +1
- You just don't understand... --- Cynthia ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 08:27:29 ) ( 1261 bytes ) +1
  - Re: At least Jossi was telling the truth about one thing --- ocker ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 15:42:14 ) ( 232 bytes ) +1
    - In Yorkshire they call them 'Winnots' Ocker! --- johnnyboy ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 16:38:57 ) ( 223 bytes )
Re: Hmmm, Pwk vs Sharia disciple --- DP ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 09:28:51 ) ( 1331 bytes ) +1
- Your wish may soon be realised DP ! --- johnnyboy ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 11:56:05 ) ( 439 bytes )
Re: Messages from bleedinghearts whoops breathinghearts --- lakeshore ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 09:29:40 ) ( 1697 bytes )
"Hard nut to crack" --- Jasper ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 10:08:14 ) ( 2766 bytes ) +6
- Re: "Hard nut to crack" --- itsleuth ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 10:19:59 ) ( 184 bytes ) +1
  - Re: "Hard nut to crack" --- Jasper ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 19:14:32 ) ( 273 bytes ) +1
    - Message deleted --- Steve ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 20:40:22 ) ( 43 bytes ) link
- Re: "Hard nut to crack" --- lakeshore ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 10:36:24 ) ( 112 bytes )
- Re: "Hard nut to crack" Right on, Jasper (no text) --- karenl ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 11:24:23 ) ( 0 bytes )
- Jasper - don't be so hard on yourself! --- johnnyboy ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 11:33:27 ) ( 997 bytes ) img +1
  - Re: Jasper - don't be so hard on yourself! -- good one! --- Cynthia ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 11:44:13 ) ( 629 bytes ) +2
    - Re: Jasper - don't be so hard on yourself! -- good one! --- Ash ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 12:06:35 ) ( 226 bytes ) +1
      - RE:We ALL missed THAT satsang!!! --- karenl ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 12:36:20 ) ( 95 bytes )
    - I somehow think we ALL must have missed it Cynthia.... --- johnnyboy ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 12:13:49 ) ( 709 bytes )
- Re: "Hard nut to crack" --- Old Timer ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 17:37:57 ) ( 548 bytes )
- Re: You certainly were a "Hard nut to crack" --- ocker ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 06:21:23 ) ( 1498 bytes ) +4
  - Re: You certainly were a "Hard nut to crack" --- jool ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 07:58:32 ) ( 930 bytes )
  - Re: "Hard nut to crack" -- scientifically speaking --- lakeshore ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 10:04:03 ) ( 2601 bytes )
  - Re: You certainly were a "Hard nut to crack" --- jasper ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 13:12:06 ) ( 1082 bytes )
  - Re: You certainly were a "Hard nut to crack" --- Cynthia ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 07:39:49 ) ( 2160 bytes ) +1
    - Re: You certainly were a "Hard nut to crack" --- PatD ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 13:26:37 ) ( 1033 bytes )

News Flash: Prem Rawat Makes Finances Public! --- Marianne ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 23:59:18 ) ( 2139 bytes ) +19

Re: News Flash: Prem Rawat Makes Finances Public! --- praline ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 01:42:41 ) ( 364 bytes )
Asian Mentality --- itsleuth ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 03:56:28 ) ( 1783 bytes ) +2
- Thank you for providing these aspects (no text) --- snow-white ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 04:09:46 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1
  - Yes, from me as well! (no text) --- Ash ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 04:12:35 ) ( 0 bytes )
- Re: Asian Mentality --- Cynthia ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 06:23:41 ) ( 2265 bytes ) img +1
  - Re: Asian Mentality --- deprogram anand ji ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 08:40:04 ) ( 921 bytes )
Re: News Flash: Prem Rawat Makes Finances Public! --- deprogram anand ji ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 06:10:52 ) ( 321 bytes ) +1
- Re: News Flash: Prem Rawat Makes Finances Public! --- Cynthia ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 06:35:03 ) ( 633 bytes ) +2
  - Art for tax break sake --- Nik ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 07:31:54 ) ( 1336 bytes ) link +1
    - Re: Art for tax break sake --- Cynthia ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 11:26:15 ) ( 204 bytes )
  - Re: News Flash: Prem Rawat Makes Finances Public! --- lakeshore ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 08:19:36 ) ( 2953 bytes ) +1
    - Re: News Flash: Prem Rawat Makes Finances Public! --- Cynthia ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 08:41:48 ) ( 769 bytes ) +1
      - message deleted by ls (nt) --- lakeshore ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 14:10:00 ) ( 5 bytes )
What bothers me about his wealth.. --- jool ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 08:06:12 ) ( 988 bytes ) +1
- Re: What bothers me about his wealth.. --- lakeshore ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 08:52:10 ) ( 161 bytes ) +2
  - Re: What bothers me about his wealth.. --- jool ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 09:29:08 ) ( 1220 bytes ) +1
    - Hilarious! Thank you, Jool! (no text) --- lakeshore ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 10:01:57 ) ( 0 bytes )
  - Re: What bothers me about his wealth.. --- karenl ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 09:40:29 ) ( 364 bytes ) +1
    - Re: What bothers me about his wealth.. --- jool ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 10:45:26 ) ( 80 bytes )

PRNewswire: Prem Rawat Tours North America with a Message of Peace --- Cynthia ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 13:29:01 ) ( 3175 bytes ) link +14

Re: PRNewswire: Prem Rawat Tours North America with a Message of Peace --- rocdoc ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 19:04:38 ) ( 123 bytes ) +1
- Re: It was a different set of inane platitudes back then. --- ocker ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 03:44:37 ) ( 756 bytes )
As if he's ever read a book --- snow-white ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 02:05:40 ) ( 541 bytes ) +1
- Re: As if he's ever read a book --- Cynthia ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 08:46:59 ) ( 278 bytes ) +1
  - What a philistine --- snow-white ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 09:29:03 ) ( 711 bytes ) +1
    - Re: What a philistine --- Cynthia ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 11:40:05 ) ( 495 bytes )
Re: PRNewswire: Prem Rawat Tours North America with a Message of Peace --- johnnyboy ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 03:37:02 ) ( 1306 bytes ) +2
- Excellent answers to his Lordship --- snow-white ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 04:17:59 ) ( 170 bytes )
- Re: PRNewswire: Prem Rawat Tours North America with a Message of Peace --- Cynthia ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 08:52:04 ) ( 604 bytes ) +1
  - I think once they did try --- snow-white ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 09:19:51 ) ( 200 bytes ) +1
    - Re: I think once they did try --- Cynthia ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 11:32:34 ) ( 179 bytes ) +1
      - Re: I think once they did try --- Ash ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 12:05:11 ) ( 211 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Jos Lammers confirmed this meeting --- ocker ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 15:54:52 ) ( 316 bytes ) +1
        
        thanks, Ocker (no text) --- snow-white ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 01:09:46 ) ( 0 bytes )

Is this 'Aid'? --- cq ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 07:30:23 ) ( 1491 bytes ) link +21

Re: Is this 'Aid'? --- quitequackers ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 07:56:33 ) ( 500 bytes )
No aid - just a justification campaign! --- Ash ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 08:28:01 ) ( 219 bytes )
Re: Is this 'Aid'? --- lakeshore ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 10:05:40 ) ( 1526 bytes ) +2
- "We know there�s a big hand behind us."- a good slap would wake ;em... --- johnnyboy ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 10:44:21 ) ( 483 bytes )
- Shame on Prem Rawat! --- Cynthia ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 11:37:12 ) ( 993 bytes ) +2
  - I really don't know Cynthia! --- Ash ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 11:58:26 ) ( 233 bytes ) +1
    - Re: I really don't know Cynthia! --- cultfree ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 23:45:25 ) ( 121 bytes )
  - Shame on Prem Rawat, Part II --- Cynthia ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 12:03:11 ) ( 944 bytes ) img +1
    - Horrendous. I wonder if the donators to tprf know about this? --- cq ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 17:16:50 ) ( 2207 bytes ) link
No - he is compounding greed with mendacity.. --- Nigel ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 13:02:54 ) ( 630 bytes ) +1
- Re: No - he is compounding greed with mendacity.. --- cq ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 06:54:26 ) ( 1408 bytes ) link +1
  - Oops! Sorry, cq, forgot to reply to this one.. --- Nigel ( Wed, Oct 07, 2009, 11:17:53 ) ( 763 bytes )
Criteria for top rated charities- 75% --- karenl ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 14:15:22 ) ( 2126 bytes ) link +1
- Re: Criteria for top rated charities- 75% --- Cynthia ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 15:01:42 ) ( 1691 bytes ) link +2
  - Re: Criteria for top rated charities- 75% --- turey ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 15:32:00 ) ( 326 bytes ) +1
    - Info on California charities... --- Cynthia ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 04:36:25 ) ( 404 bytes ) +1
      - Thanks. --- turey ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 06:41:09 ) ( 1 bytes )
  - What do they mean by 'Program Expenses'? --- cq ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 06:13:20 ) ( 523 bytes ) link +1
    - Re: What do they mean by 'Program Expenses'? --- Cynthia ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 06:40:39 ) ( 637 bytes ) +1
      - Re: What do they mean by 'Program Expenses'? --- cq ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 07:05:28 ) ( 211 bytes ) link img
One more time Rawat exploits vulnerable people by indoctrinating them in his ... (no text) --- cultfree ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 23:43:21 ) ( 0 bytes )

Living in the moment? --- old Timer ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 11:25:10 ) ( 1687 bytes ) +75

re: White Witch in 'The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe' by C S Lewis. --- johnnyboy ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 12:45:34 ) ( 1284 bytes ) +3
- Ah - you were faster than me! --- Ash ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 12:55:31 ) ( 770 bytes )
- Influences --- patD ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 17:56:44 ) ( 2155 bytes ) link +1
  - Re: Influences --- johnnyboy ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 03:31:36 ) ( 2791 bytes ) +1
    - Re: Influences --- PatD ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 13:22:39 ) ( 281 bytes ) +1
      - Re: Influences --- Nik ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 07:48:15 ) ( 516 bytes ) link +1
        
        Thanks for those links Nik. (nt) --- patD ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 13:20:38 ) ( 1 bytes )
- Re: re: White Witch in 'The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe' by C S Lewis. --- Old Timer ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 14:19:50 ) ( 1582 bytes ) +2
  - Gollum --- snow-white ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 01:57:30 ) ( 340 bytes ) +1
    - Snow White - really! You think he has time to read? --- johnnyboy ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 02:45:29 ) ( 183 bytes ) +1
      - It's tough-life to be the Lord (no text) --- snow-white ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 03:14:12 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1
        
        And we can only hope - It gets Tougher!!! (no text) --- johnnyboy ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 03:21:49 ) ( 0 bytes )
  - Re: re: White Witch in 'The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe' by C S Lewis. --- johnnyboy ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 03:18:32 ) ( 1318 bytes )
He can keep company to --- snow-white ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 14:01:33 ) ( 61 bytes )
Living in residual cult slime --- lakeshore ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 11:08:18 ) ( 6403 bytes ) +4
- Re: Living in residual cult slime Thank you thank you! --- Old Timer ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 13:29:14 ) ( 965 bytes ) +2
  - Re: Living in residual cult slime... --- lakeshore ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 15:02:39 ) ( 5448 bytes ) +1
    - Thanks LS ; You bring the lights of humanity and reason --- praline ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 02:30:52 ) ( 5 bytes )
  - Here i am ! (no text) --- praline ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 02:31:47 ) ( 0 bytes )
- Re: Living in residual cult slime --- someone ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 22:24:06 ) ( 1219 bytes ) +3
  - Re: Living in residual cult slime --- old Timer ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 01:02:51 ) ( 84 bytes )
  - and don't forget Lakeshore --- 13 ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 02:04:14 ) ( 1155 bytes ) +2
    - 13 - Thanks for noting this (no text) --- snow-white ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 02:09:41 ) ( 0 bytes )
    - Quite right, 13 --- lakeshore ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 09:13:57 ) ( 3708 bytes ) +1
      - Re: Quite right, 13 --- 13 ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 11:13:24 ) ( 314 bytes ) +1
        
        ...and then there's all the other stuff... --- Ash ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 11:53:48 ) ( 70 bytes )
  - That's the one! --- lakeshore ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 08:09:06 ) ( 999 bytes ) +1
    - Re: That's the one! --- Kelly ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 13:57:54 ) ( 524 bytes ) +1
      - Thank you, Karen --- lakeshore ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 09:51:49 ) ( 169 bytes )
- Brave Lakeshore --- snow-white ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 02:07:42 ) ( 606 bytes ) img +1
  - Re: Brave Lakeshore --- lakeshore ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 09:32:22 ) ( 1336 bytes ) +1
    - Re: Brave Lakeshore --- karenl ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 21:44:40 ) ( 2342 bytes ) +1
      - Thank you, Karen --- lakeshore ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 08:39:45 ) ( 517 bytes ) +1
        
        A big "back atcha" darling! --- karenl ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 11:36:37 ) ( 202 bytes )
- Surviving the wreckage..... --- Jasper ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 10:06:34 ) ( 5003 bytes ) +9
  - What a wonderful post, Jasper! --- Ash ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 10:39:06 ) ( 36 bytes )
  - It wasn't a train. --- 13 ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 11:17:26 ) ( 132 bytes ) +1
    - Re: It wasn't a train. A nightmare about a roller coaster! --- old Timer ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 12:05:55 ) ( 527 bytes )
  - Re: Surviving the wreckage.....The survivors! --- old Timer ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 11:51:38 ) ( 1920 bytes ) +2
    - My last Darshan dream --- karenl ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 21:33:26 ) ( 278 bytes ) +1
      - Re: My last Darshan dream --- Ash ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 02:36:47 ) ( 605 bytes )
    - Re: Surviving the wreckage.....The survivors! --- praline ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 00:17:12 ) ( 189 bytes )
  - Re: Surviving the wreckage..... --- johnnyboy ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 15:37:36 ) ( 481 bytes )
  - Re: Surviving the wreckage..... --- karenl ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 21:29:33 ) ( 1285 bytes ) link
  - Re: Surviving the wreckage..... --- lakeshore ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 22:18:07 ) ( 4683 bytes )
  - Re: Surviving the wreckage..... --- praline ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 00:08:50 ) ( 659 bytes )
  - Friendly Voices --- Jasper ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 08:20:48 ) ( 1586 bytes )
  - Re: Surviving the wreckage....Jasper (er and Nigel) --- lexy ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 09:39:19 ) ( 1478 bytes ) link +3
    - Re: Surviving the wreckage....Jasper (er and Nigel) --- lakeshore ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 10:11:15 ) ( 251 bytes ) +1
      - Re: Surviving the wreckage....Jasper (er and Nigel) --- lexy ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 10:35:36 ) ( 744 bytes ) link +1
        
        Re: Surviving the wreckage....Jasper (er and Nigel) --- lakeshore ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 17:10:32 ) ( 908 bytes )
    - Re: Surviving the wreckage....Jasper (er and Nigel) --- Jasper ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 19:07:40 ) ( 108 bytes )
    - I could have sworn my ears were burning... --- Nigel ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 13:53:47 ) ( 2183 bytes ) +4
      - This should to to the top of the page (no text) --- snow-white ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 14:12:24 ) ( 0 bytes )
      - Thank you, Nigel... excellent! (no text) --- lakeshore ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 16:03:19 ) ( 0 bytes )
      - Re: I could have sworn my ears were burning... --- lexy ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 12:46:57 ) ( 556 bytes )
      - Re: I could have sworn my ears were burning... --- old Timer ( Tue, Oct 06, 2009, 14:21:14 ) ( 31 bytes )
Re: Living in the moment? --- deprogram anand ji ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 06:20:51 ) ( 1196 bytes )
Re: Living in the moment? --- quitequackers ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 07:32:37 ) ( 607 bytes ) +1
- Re: Living in the moment? --- lakeshore ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 09:47:24 ) ( 124 bytes ) +1
  - Re: Living in the moment? --- deprogram anand ji ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 13:56:33 ) ( 381 bytes ) +2
    - Re: Living in the moment? --- quitequackers ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 14:54:43 ) ( 1474 bytes ) +1
      - what kind of peace would that be? --- Ash ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 16:08:26 ) ( 112 bytes )
    - Re: Living in the moment? Baba Ram Das 'Be Here Now' --- old Timer ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 16:23:03 ) ( 1545 bytes ) +1
      - Re: Living in the moment? Baba Ram Das 'Be Here Now' --- deprogram anand ji ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 19:50:39 ) ( 348 bytes ) +1
        
        Here and now can be very confusing --- snow-white ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 03:49:19 ) ( 267 bytes ) +1
        
        The Here and Now concept.... --- Ash ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 04:10:04 ) ( 688 bytes ) +1
        
        I agree, Ash, thank you! --- snow-white ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 04:13:15 ) ( 141 bytes ) +1
        
        *lol* --- Ash ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 04:20:42 ) ( 931 bytes ) +1
        
        What I try --- snow-white ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 04:24:15 ) ( 193 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: What I try --- deprogram anand ji ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 06:31:35 ) ( 1306 bytes ) +1
        
        : What I try or as Rawat would say it... --- lexy ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 13:15:56 ) ( 947 bytes ) +2
        
        Good job, Lexy! (no text) --- Ash ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 14:41:14 ) ( 0 bytes )
        Re: : What I try or as Rawat would say it... --- deprogram anand ji ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 05:27:22 ) ( 594 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: : What I try or as Rawat would say it... --- lexy ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 12:57:28 ) ( 158 bytes )

Mahatma's bust gathering dust in South Africa... --- Cynthia ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 13:34:40 ) ( 1580 bytes ) link

TPRF sunk to new depths? --- Mike Finch ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 07:34:48 ) ( 2316 bytes ) link +26

Re: TPRF sunk to new depths? --- ocker ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 08:53:11 ) ( 428 bytes )
Re: TPRF sunk to new depths? --- Cynthia ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 18:32:49 ) ( 3977 bytes )
Re: TPRF sunk to new depths? --- quitequackers ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 08:04:26 ) ( 235 bytes ) +1
- Re: TPRF sunk to new depths? --- quitequackers ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 09:35:14 ) ( 53 bytes ) +1
  - Re: TPRF sunk to new depths? --- Ash ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 10:18:47 ) ( 158 bytes ) +1
    - Re: TPRF sunk to new depths? --- quitequackers ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 10:38:24 ) ( 294 bytes ) +1
      - Well... --- Ash ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 10:47:33 ) ( 1512 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Well... --- quitequackers ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 10:52:29 ) ( 476 bytes ) +2
        
        Re: Well... --- quitequackers ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 10:58:01 ) ( 731 bytes ) +1
        
        Could you please... --- Ash ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 11:05:22 ) ( 399 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Could you please... --- quitequackers ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 12:05:28 ) ( 608 bytes ) +1
        
        Thank you! --- Ash ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 12:48:46 ) ( 538 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Thank you! --- quitequackers ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 12:54:05 ) ( 101 bytes ) +1
        
        I also enjoyed our little conversation. Have fun and more fun here! (no text) --- Ash ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 12:56:45 ) ( 0 bytes )
        
        It's not about "value" .... --- Ash ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 11:02:00 ) ( 824 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: It's not about "value" .... --- quitequackers ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 11:09:05 ) ( 281 bytes ) +2
        
        Okay! --- Ash ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 11:13:08 ) ( 381 bytes )
        Re: It's not about "value" .... --- quitequackers ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 11:19:12 ) ( 275 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: It's not about "value" .... --- quitequackers ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 11:21:40 ) ( 194 bytes ) +1
        
        Okay.... --- Ash ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 11:55:45 ) ( 378 bytes ) link +1
        
        Re: Okay.... --- quitequackers ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 14:31:13 ) ( 168 bytes ) +1
        
        I'm not in for a spat.... --- Ash ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 15:41:58 ) ( 635 bytes )
Comments on my post from a Rawat-sympathizer, and my and Nik's response --- Mike Finch ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 09:55:23 ) ( 3564 bytes ) link +3
- Well, then let's wait and see..... --- Ash ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 10:32:16 ) ( 224 bytes )
- Re: Comments on my post from a Rawat-sympathizer, and my and Nik's response --- old Timer ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 12:21:53 ) ( 454 bytes )
- give monney yes, indoctrinate no (MODIFIED) --- praline ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 01:02:23 ) ( 268 bytes )

Is it right for Rawat to be allowed to indoctrinate victims from a war zone? --- cq ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 05:58:40 ) ( 2709 bytes ) link +2

They only instrumentalize these victims... --- Ash ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 06:37:02 ) ( 149 bytes )
Re: Is it right for Rawat to be allowed to indoctrinate victims from a war zone? --- quitequackers ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 07:49:42 ) ( 71 bytes )

A Peace Pen worthy of Prem --- karenl ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 00:06:16 ) ( 1688 bytes ) link

to the very civilized people of THIS forum --- praline ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 02:31:43 ) ( 1333 bytes ) +43

suite --- praline ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 02:40:07 ) ( 403 bytes )
Oh Praline - I had no idea! --- johnnyboy ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 03:44:42 ) ( 673 bytes ) img +2
- Re: Oh Praline - I had no idea! --- praline ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 04:35:04 ) ( 36 bytes )
- Neither me! --- Ash ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 07:30:31 ) ( 712 bytes ) +1
  - Re: Neither me! --- praline ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 07:40:26 ) ( 389 bytes )
Re: to the very civilized people of THIS forum --- snow-white ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 06:35:53 ) ( 1481 bytes ) img +2
- Here yes, there no --- praline ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 07:29:19 ) ( 454 bytes ) +2
  - Ahhhhh!!!! Okay!!!!! (no text) --- Ash ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 08:13:40 ) ( 0 bytes )
  - Re: Here yes, there no --- deprogram anand ji ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 08:58:45 ) ( 343 bytes )
- Re: to the very civilized people of THIS forum --- johnnyboy ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 07:31:50 ) ( 1300 bytes ) img
Re: to the very civilized people of THIS forum --- karenl ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 07:22:10 ) ( 21 bytes ) +1
- Thanks K (no text) --- praline ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 07:30:48 ) ( 0 bytes )
Re: to the very civilized people of THIS forum --- 13 ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 07:30:11 ) ( 560 bytes ) +1
- Re: to the very civilized people of THIS forum --- praline ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 07:44:18 ) ( 113 bytes ) +1
  - Re: to the very civilized people of THIS forum --- deprogram anand ji ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 09:01:50 ) ( 563 bytes )
Re: to the very civilized people of THIS forum (OT) --- Cynthia ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 07:51:41 ) ( 610 bytes ) +1
- Thanks and --- praline ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 08:31:33 ) ( 345 bytes ) img
thanks for your warms hugs and words ; I feel free once again ; --- praline ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 08:28:32 ) ( 221 bytes ) +2
- Re: thanks for your warms hugs and words ; I feel free once again ; --- deprogram anand ji ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 09:04:31 ) ( 339 bytes ) +2
  - His answer will be mine --- praline ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 10:41:30 ) ( 295 bytes ) +3
    - I was right --- 13 ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 11:22:50 ) ( 52 bytes )
    - Re: His answer will be mine --- deprogram anand ji ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 13:21:42 ) ( 416 bytes ) link +2
      - Re: His answer will be mine --- lexy ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 13:27:24 ) ( 119 bytes )
      - Re: His answer will be mine (OT) --- Cynthia ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 16:26:07 ) ( 6014 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: His answer will be mine (OT) --- deprogram anand ji ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 07:06:13 ) ( 2274 bytes ) +1
        
        Hey dpa... --- Ash ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 13:39:20 ) ( 220 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Hey dpa... --- deprogram anand ji ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 13:59:29 ) ( 133 bytes ) +1
        
        Thanks! --- Ash ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 16:10:57 ) ( 60 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Thanks! --- deprogram anand ji ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 19:52:19 ) ( 18 bytes )
    - Great (no text) --- snow-white ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 00:05:40 ) ( 0 bytes )
  - Re: thanks for your warms hugs and words ; I feel free once again ; --- lexy ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 13:12:36 ) ( 233 bytes )
- Another hug to one of my dear classmates! --- lakeshore ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 09:49:11 ) ( 929 bytes ) +1
  - Re: Another hug to one of my dear classmates! --- praline ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 10:44:39 ) ( 432 bytes ) +1
    - Re: Another hug to one of my dear classmates! --- Old Timer ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 13:37:37 ) ( 28 bytes ) +1
      - Re: Another hug to one of my dear classmates! --- praline ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 01:32:10 ) ( 6 bytes )
Re: to the very civilized people of THIS forum --- Kelly ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 14:35:30 ) ( 844 bytes ) +2
- I know what you mean, Karen...(OT) --- Cynthia ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 15:19:10 ) ( 5026 bytes ) +3
  - Compliments? --- lakeshore ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 15:49:57 ) ( 422 bytes ) +1
    - Re: Compliments? --- Cynthia ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 15:53:11 ) ( 144 bytes )
  - Re: I know what you mean, Karen...(OT) --- snow-white ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 00:21:17 ) ( 289 bytes )
  - Re: I know what you mean, Karen...(OT) --- Kelly ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 10:47:02 ) ( 1171 bytes ) +1
    - Blimey O'Rielly (spellin?) --- Kelly ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 11:37:14 ) ( 322 bytes )
- Re: to the very civilized people of THIS forum --- praline ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 01:41:56 ) ( 319 bytes )

Another golf event, but with a new slant... --- Mike Finch ( Wed, Sep 30, 2009, 10:08:03 ) ( 2450 bytes ) link +23

Re: Another golf event, but with a new slant... --- Cynthia ( Wed, Sep 30, 2009, 10:19:53 ) ( 82 bytes ) +1
- gigolo? --- karenl ( Wed, Sep 30, 2009, 10:31:51 ) ( 53 bytes ) +1
  - gigolo?....pimp, more like --- patD ( Wed, Sep 30, 2009, 21:07:40 ) ( 1956 bytes )
Crown Green Bowling? (slant?) (no text) --- johnnyboy ( Wed, Sep 30, 2009, 10:43:38 ) ( 0 bytes )
Re: Another golf event, but with a new slant... --- Angela ( Wed, Sep 30, 2009, 15:22:21 ) ( 237 bytes )
"And we'll have fun, fun, fun, till the master takes the money away" (no text) --- hilltop ( Wed, Sep 30, 2009, 16:33:25 ) ( 0 bytes )
Re: Another golf event, but with a new slant... --- quitequackers ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 07:24:12 ) ( 141 bytes )
Re: Another golf event, but with a new slant... --- quitequackers ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 07:55:13 ) ( 183 bytes ) +2
- Perhaps QQ? he just wants to hold on to some of his old Hole iness? (no text) --- johnnyboy ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 08:33:14 ) ( 0 bytes )
- I really dislike anything to do with golf --- karenl ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 14:26:36 ) ( 85 bytes ) +2
  - Then you may like this from George Carlin. (Off Topic ~ somewhat) --- hilltop ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 22:11:06 ) ( 320 bytes ) link +3
    - Ha ha, Hilltop --- snow-white ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 01:30:42 ) ( 294 bytes ) +1
      - I like the name "Snow White" because Your posts are full of kindness! --- hilltop ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 23:56:50 ) ( 136 bytes ) link +1
        
        Hey Hilltop --- snow-white ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 00:38:23 ) ( 333 bytes ) img
    - I take it that George doesn't like golf??? --- johnnyboy ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 06:24:55 ) ( 412 bytes ) img +1
      - Yes, very good points John! Esp. about the ashrams and the 'Divine Cities' --- hilltop ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 00:53:08 ) ( 849 bytes ) file img +1
        
        When you re read this stuff - it really hits home - Idiot Ji!! --- johnnyboy ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 05:17:41 ) ( 663 bytes )
    - wonderful - thanks --- karenl ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 07:42:06 ) ( 154 bytes ) +1
      - Your welcome Karen... Thank You too! --- hilltop ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 22:12:38 ) ( 840 bytes ) link +1
        
        Thanks, Carlin was great (no text) --- karenl ( Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 13:43:53 ) ( 0 bytes )
  - There are doing one is Asheville too - must be just for you Karen --- Mike Finch ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 07:14:26 ) ( 1796 bytes ) +1
    - Re: There are doing one is Asheville too - must be just for you Karen --- karenl ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 07:37:45 ) ( 444 bytes )
And Charnanand in Boston... --- Mike Finch ( Mon, Oct 05, 2009, 07:33:15 ) ( 1380 bytes )

itsleuth raised an interesting point. --- ocker ( Wed, Sep 30, 2009, 17:12:11 ) ( 1704 bytes ) +65

Ocker, you raise a number of points... --- Mike Finch ( Wed, Sep 30, 2009, 18:11:30 ) ( 3906 bytes ) link +4
- Re: Ocker, you raise a number of points... --- itsleuth ( Wed, Sep 30, 2009, 18:27:07 ) ( 33 bytes )
- spot on... --- tommo ( Wed, Sep 30, 2009, 19:01:23 ) ( 469 bytes )
- Re: Finchy, bonza, fair suck of the sav --- ocker ( Wed, Sep 30, 2009, 21:35:43 ) ( 2638 bytes ) +4
  - Re: Finchy, bonza, fair suck of the sav. A Trollish Bee --- old Timer ( Wed, Sep 30, 2009, 23:40:42 ) ( 488 bytes )
  - "A subterfuge that I am not yet sure itsleuth is not part of..." --- Ash ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 00:23:27 ) ( 625 bytes ) +1
    - About Uncertainty --- snow-white ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 02:01:25 ) ( 1031 bytes ) +2
      - TO EVERYONE - STOP SPECULATING THAT NEW PEOPLE ARE TROLLS! --- Admin ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 02:42:14 ) ( 404 bytes ) +3
        
        Re: TO EVERYONE - STOP SPECULATING THAT NEW PEOPLE ARE TROLLS! --- Nik ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 03:05:50 ) ( 920 bytes ) +1
        
        re: but genuine posters can also unintentionally push buttons --- johnnyboy ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 04:40:38 ) ( 2285 bytes )
        
        Re: TO EVERYONE... --- lakeshore ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 06:36:13 ) ( 1182 bytes )
        Re: TO EVERYONE - STOP SPECULATING THAT NEW PEOPLE ARE TROLLS! --- quitequackers ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 07:20:04 ) ( 224 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Save it for later --- JHB ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 08:04:30 ) ( 150 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Save it for later --- quitequackers ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 08:15:17 ) ( 38 bytes ) +1
        
        You definitely have my support (for what it's worth) qq --- johnnyboy ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 09:29:45 ) ( 141 bytes )
      - @ Snow-White - Re: About Uncertainty --- Ash ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 12:23:48 ) ( 1300 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: @ Snow-White - Re: About Uncertainty --- snow-white ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 13:39:59 ) ( 512 bytes ) img +2
        
        About posting here... --- Cynthia ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 14:54:26 ) ( 2938 bytes ) +1
        
        Thank you Cynthia! --- Ash ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 15:04:02 ) ( 1166 bytes ) +2
        
        Feel better, Ash! --- Cynthia ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 17:54:18 ) ( 155 bytes )
        Speedy recovery, Ash (no text) --- snow-white ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 01:18:52 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1
        
        Thank you SW and Cynthia! --- Ash ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 08:09:27 ) ( 60 bytes )
        
        Snow white! Re: C S Lewis........ --- johnnyboy ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 15:05:24 ) ( 489 bytes ) +2
        
        Thanks John, I will (no text) --- snow-white ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 01:38:30 ) ( 0 bytes )
        Ash might take a long time.... --- Ash ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 08:12:32 ) ( 212 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Ash might take a long time.... --- johnnyboy ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 08:48:35 ) ( 325 bytes ) img +1
        
        What a lovely idea! --- Ash ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 12:21:31 ) ( 67 bytes )
  - Re: Finchy, bonza, fair suck of the sav --- Bette ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 00:37:12 ) ( 555 bytes )
  - 'Finchy, bonza, fair suck of the sav' - what does that mean?? --- Mike Finch ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 07:48:56 ) ( 2062 bytes ) +4
    - Re: 'Finchy, bonza, fair suck of the sav' - what does that mean?? --- ocker ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 09:41:39 ) ( 422 bytes ) +1
      - Re: 'Finchy, bonza, fair suck of the sav' - what does that mean?? --- cq ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 14:13:06 ) ( 443 bytes ) link +1
        
        Re: 'Finchy, bonza, fair suck of the sav' - what does that mean?? --- ocker ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 08:55:23 ) ( 72 bytes ) +1
        
        Glad to hear that, Ocker --- cq ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 03:42:20 ) ( 658 bytes )
    - Thanks Mike! --- old Timer ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 13:39:26 ) ( 7 bytes )
    - Bravo Finchy ! --- lexy ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 15:03:38 ) ( 1810 bytes )
    - deja vu --- Bette ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 17:56:50 ) ( 1121 bytes ) +2
      - Actually the 180 degree opposite of deja vu - kindness is radical --- Mike Finch ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 21:00:23 ) ( 2547 bytes ) +5
        
        Yes! (NT). --- turey ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 21:49:20 ) ( 1 bytes )
        Great Words about being kind, It's an important message!. Thanks Mike (no text) --- hilltop ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 22:40:13 ) ( 0 bytes )
        To kindness! (no text) --- snow-white ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 01:24:43 ) ( 0 bytes )
        The idea of 'Tough Love'.... --- johnnyboy ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 04:07:19 ) ( 2084 bytes )
        Re: Actually the 180 degree opposite of deja vu - kindness is radical --- PatD ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 21:14:04 ) ( 284 bytes ) link img
      - "cuz we wouldn't want to scare them away" this scares me even now... --- hilltop ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 23:07:50 ) ( 0 bytes ) file img +2
        
        Sorry but here's a few more scary & Fun Halloween ideas for the kids... --- hilltop ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 23:31:01 ) ( 0 bytes ) file img
        Re: "cuz we wouldn't want to scare them away" this scares me even n... --- johnnyboy ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 04:14:25 ) ( 439 bytes ) img +1
        
        Re: "cuz we wouldn't want to scare them away" this scares me even n... --- hilltop ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 23:24:26 ) ( 771 bytes ) link file img
- Many thanks, Mike... --- Cynthia ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 09:55:01 ) ( 260 bytes ) +1
  - Re: Many thanks, Mike... --- Ash ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 12:42:08 ) ( 139 bytes )
I think you are missing the point ! --- itsleuth ( Wed, Sep 30, 2009, 18:24:09 ) ( 1065 bytes ) +2
- I think your one issue is actually two issues... [edited] --- Mike Finch ( Wed, Sep 30, 2009, 18:45:39 ) ( 1529 bytes ) +1
  - Re: I think your one issue is actually two issues... [edited] --- karenl ( Wed, Sep 30, 2009, 19:34:11 ) ( 233 bytes ) +2
    - Yes I would Karen!! --- johnnyboy ( Wed, Sep 30, 2009, 20:26:24 ) ( 242 bytes ) img
    - "Would you want Jesus to ride a donkey?" --- cultfree ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 00:00:55 ) ( 461 bytes ) +1
      - Actually cultfree - I was going to say.... --- johnnyboy ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 03:56:27 ) ( 105 bytes ) +1
        
        LOL!!!! (no text) --- karenl ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 06:40:59 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: LOL!!!! --- johnnyboy ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 09:04:09 ) ( 1784 bytes )
- Extravagancy --- snow-white ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 02:15:40 ) ( 1104 bytes ) link +2
  - WoW! thankfully some kind of 'grace' spared me this horror!! --- johnnyboy ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 13:37:19 ) ( 643 bytes )
  - Re: Extravagancy. Good link for all and Jasper --- Old Timer ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 19:14:23 ) ( 496 bytes ) +2
    - Not only - but also!! --- johnnyboy ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 05:31:18 ) ( 1222 bytes ) +1
      - Well well well...... --- Ash ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 08:21:35 ) ( 1033 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Well well well...... --- johnnyboy ( Fri, Oct 02, 2009, 08:57:34 ) ( 452 bytes )
    - Re: Extravagancy. Good link for all and Jasper --- Jasper ( Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 00:33:02 ) ( 146 bytes )
Re: itsleuth raised an interesting point. --- Nik ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 02:49:04 ) ( 902 bytes )
Re: itsleuth raised an interesting point. --- deprogram anand ji ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 07:07:28 ) ( 293 bytes )

Middle East solution found! --- JHB ( Wed, Sep 30, 2009, 13:01:00 ) ( 543 bytes ) link +2

We can sleep in our beds (if we mended em well?) --- johnnyboy ( Wed, Sep 30, 2009, 14:48:03 ) ( 494 bytes )
Re: Middle East solution found! --- Cynthia ( Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 14:27:58 ) ( 949 bytes )