Where are you quoting from? Is that from the transcript that was posted here? Or have you heard the recording?
Because I have heard the recording and you are grossly distorting and misrepresenting what was said. For example, it wasn't a discussion about a parent innocently touching a child's genitals to wash or dress them for example, but rather"inappropriately" and repeatedly doing so. A lot more is said about this referring to both sons being victims and both parents being the abusers. It is quite shocking and Prem Rawat does indeed admit to knowing what he did was wrong.
So I have to wonder what your intention here is. If you feel uncertain because you lack the full picture, why would you so vehemently defend Prem Rawat over the very clear accusations coming from his adult son that it was indeed abuse. Why would you jump to the defence of an alleged child abuser rather than at least remain impartial?
Or are you not playing with an open deck here? It is just bizarre, like you are Prem's defence lawyer in a trial. In any case, you clearly seem like you are on a mission not to find out the truth but rather to vindicate Prem Rawat at all costs.
