You did all the work to make the site and of course, the choices are yours it is your site.

I am not concerned a journalist would feel "horror" but I have heard that the first impression with some of the blunt jokes is to discount the objectivity of the site.

The likes of Ron Geaves on the other hand...

https://premrawat-maharaji.info/index7df0.html

What I think is what a shame if the bluntness makes the apologists appear more objective when you have the documentation! 

https://culteducation.com/group/1933-integrity-and-suspicion-in-new-religious-movement-researchs.html