Find

Reload

Overview
  NewestArchive
Admin
That was then, this is now . . .
  Forum
Posted by:
Dr.wow ®

10/26/2005, 21:42:41
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




I was just thinkin' the other day about all the programs I had attended where Rawat pretty much blew a gasket screaming at me to surrender and be more devoted to him and knowledge.

Actually, the concept of devotion was always a huge stumbling block for me. I always wondered why this was necessary to practice knowledge. I know now that he was merely importing wholesale the Hindu concept and practice of bhakti yoga whereby being a worshipper of the teacher would ultimately bring about transcendence. This was obstensibly through some "magical" process imparted from the guru and taught to us as being by his "grace". I never really bought into this, I guess I inherently knew that it was nonsense.

Many times the idea of surrendering to "Guru Maharaj Ji" was used interchangeably with surrendering to "holy name" or the knowledge, this always seemed to me to be an intentional blurring of the lines. The implication of course was that Guru and this inner experience were one and the same. And also that loving him or being devoted to him actually could trump meditation as being the way to find our "bliss".

Why am I bringing this up now? Well, given all that we know now about Malibu Prem the boozer and abuser it gets very difficult indeed to just chalk all this crap up to some kind of cultural misunderstanding or youthful naivety as EV would like people to think. Here is a guy who put out an "instructor training manual" which talked in the heaviest of details about commitment and dedication and devotion and warned us about the possibility of shattering into a million pieces that could never be put back together again should that commitment and devotion ever waver. Arrogant, manipulative and deluded? Those would be some of the kinder words . . .






Modified by Dr.wow at Wed, Oct 26, 2005, 21:44:38

Previous Recommend View All Current page Next
Re: That was then, then is now...
Re: That was then, this is now . . . -- Dr.wow Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Marianne ®

10/26/2005, 22:26:11
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Dr. Wow, have you listened to the trainings from 1999? Go ahead for a few minutes. I think you will find they echo just what you are talking about.

Marianne







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: That was then, then is now...
Re: Re: That was then, then is now... -- Marianne Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
bill ®

10/27/2005, 23:50:00
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Marianne, I am ready to show you now.

I have your email, but god knows where.

please re post it.







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Hi bill
Re: Re: That was then, then is now... -- bill Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Marianne ®

10/28/2005, 11:17:30
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators










Previous Recommend Current page Next
Now is still then...
Re: That was then, this is now . . . -- Dr.wow Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Mike Finch ®

10/27/2005, 05:04:59
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Hi Wow

Many times the idea of surrendering to "Guru Maharaj Ji" was used interchangeably with surrendering to "holy name" or the knowledge, this always seemed to me to be an intentional blurring of the lines. The implication of course was that Guru and this inner experience were one and the same.

Like Marianne says, there is no doubt in my mind from the contact I still have with active premies that most of them (certainly those who got Knowledge a while ago) still believe in all this today. It is not a thing of the past.

For most premies, Maharaji is still the embodiment of that 'superior power', who can channel his grace to the devoted and surrendered premie.

And also that loving him or being devoted to him actually could trump meditation as being the way to find our "bliss".

I don't think it so much 'trumps' meditation, as that meditation (meaning practising the Knowledge), along with satsang and service, was and is the way to keep that 'channel' clear and unobstructed, so that the grace could flow. You practised Knowledge so that Maharaji could show you your 'heart' and save you, since your mind was much too powerful to let you find your 'heart' unaided. That is still why the Knowledge has to be given within Maharaji's 'agya' (meaning given in the system he has set up); if you just learn the techniques from elsewhere, however hard you practise them, you will never get anywhere since there is not that 'connection' to Maharaji for the grace to flow.

This belief system has been pretty consistent from the earliest days till now. I write about it more fully in the first few Maharaji articles on my site.

-- Mike






Modified by Mike Finch at Thu, Oct 27, 2005, 05:12:20

Previous Recommend Current page Next
Actually, I think Wow's got a point there
Re: Now is still then... -- Mike Finch Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Jim ®

10/27/2005, 10:20:08
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Hi Mike, Wow,

Wasn't it the case in the late 70's that Rawat really did put a higher premium on devotion than meditation?  That's how I remember it.  Suddenly, it was almost suspect to be too into meditation.  Rather, we should want to spend as much time as possible sitting around regurgitating the myriad catch phrases of abject servility and desperate love Rawat fed us in his own satsangs.  That's why instructors trained in these marathon mind-f**cking sessions rather than by trying to strengthen, deepen or whatever it is one thinks one can do to meditation to make it better. 

It was as if, after spending five or so years giving the initial path the good ol' college try and failing miserably (i.e. no one "realized Knowledge" as promised and expected), we now saw the goal was essentially unachieavable.  It was a cosmic joke and we were the fallboys.  After all, when you really stopped to think about it, who were we anyways to think we could ever overcome our weak, human natures like that?  Better to just be humble and praise the Lord, beg him for his mercy, again and again and again.

Surely, Paddy and I can't be the only ones who remember it like this?

  






Modified by Jim at Thu, Oct 27, 2005, 10:21:32

Previous Recommend Current page Next
I think you are right, Jim
Re: Actually, I think Wow's got a point there -- Jim Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Joe ®

10/27/2005, 13:12:06
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




At least during that period, Malibu Prem hardly even talked about knowledge, or practicing knowledge and certainly not doing meditation, and it just came down to devotion and surrender.

To me, this culimated in Malibu Prem's Christmas, 1979 satsang at DECA, which I think was "phone fed" around the world.  You won't find any discussion of SS&M or doing meditation.  It was just devotion, surrender, and of course, SERVICE.

The best examples on video of that, are Brian McDermott, and even Michael Dettmers giving satsang at the program in the Poconos, I think it was September, 1979.  They both say, Brian in a more inane and nutty fashion, that knowledge was just an excuse, kind of like bait or something, to get you to recognize Maharaji and devote your life to him, which was really what it was all about..

So, I think you are absolutely right.

I also agree with Mike that most of the premies from that period, who are still hangers on around Malibu Prem, still believe that, perhaps in a somewhat more suburban, materialistic,  way.






Modified by Joe at Thu, Oct 27, 2005, 13:14:06

Previous Recommend Current page Next
I remember that period well
Re: I think you are right, Jim -- Joe Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
T ®

10/27/2005, 14:03:51
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




perhaps it could be called the super devotional period?

I think, and this is certainly true for me and many others I know, that this hard on Satguru phase turned lots of people off and which led directly to the 'spaced-out' eighties.  Perhaps it was a combination of things, the turn off of the emphasis that Maharaji made on surrender and devotion as well as the need for many to grow up (as in getting their lives together) as well as simply needing to explore things of the 'world'.  After all for many premies, the whole of the 70s represented a deprived time, what with being incarcerated in ashrams, going to satsang every evening and generally being totally focussed on Maharaji and his whims.

I think that a lot of premies fell away during the 80s period and never returned, some of us were the fools and stayed around, but of course we did not think of it that way at the time.

I also think that Maharaji, or certainly people around him that were able to influence him (limited as that may have been) realised that the super devotional period was a big turn off and this resulted, in part, in Maharaji toning down this aspect to be able to garner new recruits into his cult.  Of course he does not see it as a cult, I think he geniuenly believed and still does that he is someone 'special' and able to help others, mixed in of course with his need to retain his earthly trappings.

T







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: I remember the end of that period differently
Re: I remember that period well -- T Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
paddy ®

10/27/2005, 16:16:44
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators





I remember it somewhat differently though I'm pretty sure there were many different possibilities in DLM then. I recall that at the end of the "devotional" period there were actually more practising premies than in the preceding decade even though it had been diffidult to "receive Knowledge" since 1975.

Far from being a "deprived" time it was an emotionally very rich and intense time so there was no feeling of deprivation, quite the contrary. I thought even then that it was the external events in society, namely the revulsion caused by the Jonestown massacre and the jailing of Rev. Moon and Hubbard's wife by the US government that caused the demise of DLM. Dettmer's evidence that possible future financial problems for Rawat that might come from the ashrams also influenced it. It was a bolt from above, unexpected and unwanted by the premies when the ashrams were finally closed and satsang ended.







Previous Recommend Current page Next
It was a very fearful thing to leave at that time.
Re: Re: I remember the end of that period differently -- paddy Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Joe ®

10/27/2005, 17:09:03
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




From what I recall hardly anybody received knowledge in the West after about 1975, but during the dark, devotional period it was very hard to leave, because FEAR became a huge element in the cult, much more so than it had been.  Malibu Prem was basically saying you would go to hell if you left.

The ashram premies even got it worse, not only would you go to hell if you left Rawat, if you left the ashram it was almost as bad.  After the Reinaissance of 1976, Maharaji really laid on the guilt trip for anybody who had left the ashram (which was probably the majority, although at least in the States a number of ashrams remained open), and then there was a huge campaign to get everyone possible to move into the ashrams as well.

To me, that's why the closing of the ashrams was such a strange event.  After all the fire and brimstone Rawat put us through, all the fear inculcated about moving out of the ashram, and the big campaign to get everyone to move in, the closure, with no explanation was just really weird. 

In my experience, and from what I saw, devoted cult members did not dare leave during the dark devotional period.  It was when things lightened up some, and people were less afraid, that a lot of people left.  There was a pretty huge exodus from the cult in 1976 and another huge one around 1982-1983.  Both those periods were times of a kind of less fear, or at least less organization, and at least some idea that it was okay to be an individual and perhaps have a life. Most of my ex-premie friends left in that 1983 period, as did I.

But I recall the 1977-1983 period as being pretty dark.  That's the way it felt to me anyway.  Very suffocating.  Nothing outside the cult, no propagation, just projects for Maharji like the plane, constant fundraising, and a screaming Maharaji at festivals telling us to surrender or die and what ingrates we were for not having done it yet.  It was pretty awful and a very difficult period for me, because I never actually liked Rawat very much personally, and the devotional love crap was all it was about around then.  It sucked, and it all came from Maharaji, personally.  There is no way he can blame it on anybody else, not that he won't try, being that he never accepts responsibilty for anything.

I left before satsang ended, but I'm sure that was pretty weird as well, considering that it was a commandment for a decade before that.






Modified by Joe at Thu, Oct 27, 2005, 17:16:02

Previous Recommend Current page Next
We all have different perspectives
Re: It was a very fearful thing to leave at that time. -- Joe Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
JHB ®

10/27/2005, 18:20:25
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Joe,

Whereas I agree that the late 70s was the time when Rawat emphasised devotion, I didn't experience it as particularly dark. Maybe this is because I lived in Leeds, England; maybe it was because I was married and no longer in the ashram; and maybe it was because I actually liked, in a strange way, being yelled at, by the person I thought was the incarnation of God, to devote my life to him.

So for me, yes, I remember an increased emphasis on devotion and surrender from Rawat, but I also remember some crazy but subjectively profound times being a devotee. Could I have lived my life better? - definitely. Did Rawat lie to me? - definitely. Was it all bad? - definitely not. What would have been worse is a life where I never tried to find the 'Truth' - I don't think I would have appreciated the value of the ordinary if I had never thought all value was in the extraordinary.

Anyway, we moved to London in early 1980, and we didn't really fit in with any premie community there, and gradually work and work friends became more important on a day to day level than premies, so satsang being replaced by videos, the closing of the ashrams, the lack of publications/photos/etc., didn't have such a profound effect on me. And when 1987 came with the rejoice events and the revisionism, I just lapped it up.

John.







Previous Recommend Current page Next
They were the best of times, they were the worst of times
Re: We all have different perspectives -- JHB Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Jim ®

10/27/2005, 19:48:14
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




You know, one thing that was kind of nice about the late seventies was a certain relief we shared (at least Paddy and I did) in that we just kind of gave up trying to merge with the word, "realize Knowledge", become God-realized, however you say it.  It was easier to back off from the fervent effort we were pushed to make in the earlier years.  Now we settled into just being devotee shlubs, kind of.  Our lives revolved not around the cosmic so much as around just being good premies. 

Of course that wasn't by any means easy.  I mean, it might have seemed easy enough but Rawat spent a lot of time explaining to us that no, things were not OK, that our minds were circling us like sharks and we had absolutely no means whatsoever to distinguish Mr. Mind from Guru Maharaj Ji within in inside (??).  We could pray, smile and hope.  Mind you, hope was a bit of a mental trick and an implicit slight on our faith and that smile?  Well with Rawat it was simple: if you had a smile, he might let you keep it.  He might pat you on the head and let you sing another treacly song to him.  However, he was just as inclined to try to wipe it off your face.  You know, a little fear-sang would do the trick, easy.  On the other hand, if you didn't have a smile (perhaps you were just recalling some of the Lord's earlier fear-sang), he'd be more than happy to make fun of you for being so mopey and serious.  Either which way, there were lessons for everyone!







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: They were the best of times, they were the worst of times
Re: They were the best of times, they were the worst of times -- Jim Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
paddy ®

10/28/2005, 16:09:49
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




A very apt quote indeed.

However far from giving up trying to merge I was more into it in the late 70's as my life cirumstances had changed and I had more time to commit to ss&m. But I considered that if you were making the effort (and it wasn't that hard for me as I preferred ss&m to other activites) there was nothing to worry about as the results were out of your control. It seems to be a given in the "spiritual life" as recorded by those who have become famous for their efforts therein that the Grace of God was very very necessary to achieve realisation and I was prepared to let God to his side of the job and I would just concentrate on the ss&m.

While I wasn't part of the gopi scene I respected peoples' differences and appreciated that bhakti was as valid as jnana and I thought that if Rawat and God had a significant relationship all would be revealed in the fullness of time and by golly it was.

It was also reasonably plain that Rawat did giver bliss-sang and fear-sang and so I didn't think too much about either.







Previous Recommend Current page Next
the value of the ordinary
Re: We all have different perspectives -- JHB Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
13 ®

10/28/2005, 14:50:55
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




'I don't think I would have appreciated the value of the ordinary if I had never thought all value was in the extraordinary.'








Previous Recommend Current page Next
That's how it was for me as well.
Re: It was a very fearful thing to leave at that time. -- Joe Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Dr.wow ®

10/27/2005, 18:44:22
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators










Previous Recommend Current page Next
Hey Doctor....
Re: That's how it was for me as well. -- Dr.wow Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Joe ®

10/28/2005, 15:03:04
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Did you live in the USA as a premie?  Did you live in the ashram?  Do I know you? 

No need to betray you anonymity if you don't want to, but you experience sounds very similar to mine.







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: Hey Doctor....
Re: Hey Doctor.... -- Joe Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Dr.wow ®

10/28/2005, 16:10:43
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




I can't give much detail right now 'cuz I'm on my way out for dinner. But in a nutshell I lived in the ashram in Toronto, Canada. Ann Johnson was my "housemother" so that might tell you something. We don't know each other but having read some of your posts I would say our perspectives are very similar. I knew Jim pretty well though. Ciao for now . .






Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: It was a very fearful thing to leave at that time.
Re: It was a very fearful thing to leave at that time. -- Joe Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Steve ®

10/29/2005, 11:01:11
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




From what I recall hardly anybody received knowledge in the West after about 1975, but during the dark, devotional period it was very hard to leave, because FEAR became a huge element in the cult, much more so than it had been.  Malibu Prem was basically saying you would go to hell if you left.

Joe, I don't remember him saying anything specific about "going to hell" but I do remember the falling/jumping off Maharaji's boat metaphor and then having to deal with sharks in the ocean of maya.

Perhaps Hilltop could find that one.







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Maharaji said you would go to hell...
Re: Re: It was a very fearful thing to leave at that time. -- Steve Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Joe ®

10/31/2005, 11:36:12
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Maharaji said specifically and directly that if you didn't have devotion to him you would go to hell in the Christmas, 1979 Satsang, which I believe you can see on EPO.  I actually have a hard copy of it from Divine Times.  So, it was even worse than saying it would happen if you didn't practice knowledge (which is what he "rotten vegetable" threat referred to), but that if you didn't have devotion to him.  Pretty extreme.







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: Maharaji said you would go to hell...
Re: Maharaji said you would go to hell... -- Joe Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Steve ®

11/01/2005, 18:14:01
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Thanks Joe,

Could you give me the URL for that quote? Something as damning as that, should definitely be in the Gallery.

And Hilltop, if you are reading this, could you find any references to falling off Maharaji's boat into the ocean of maya, which is of course full of sharks. That one really got to me.

So much for simply meditating, feeling God's love, and being in the Kingdom of Heaven.







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: Maharaji said you would go to hell...
Re: Re: Maharaji said you would go to hell... -- Steve Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Gallery ®

11/02/2005, 01:21:39
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Hi Steve

http://www.ex-premie.org/papers/christmas_satsang.htm

I agree that a scan of that talk would be good for the Gallery. If someone sends it to me I would be most happy to put it up in the Gallery. Maybe Hilltop will see this thread and have a look out for it?  I know he only looks in about once or twice a week.

F8 Gallery







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: Maharaji said you would go to hell...
Re: Re: Maharaji said you would go to hell... -- Steve Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Joe ®

11/02/2005, 17:12:46
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




What's amazing is that I was sitting in the room when he said this kind of stuff, including that particular satsang, and it just didn't seem unusal or strange.  The fact the Elan Vital would print that in it's official publication in 1980 just goes top show you that Elan Vital was promoting the same notion, and didn't see any need to tone it down at all.  Everyone knew that Rawat was preaching total devotion to him, and that is you didn't have it, you were in trouble.

So much for Elan Vital's current PR campaign that it's all about world peace.  It makes you want to laugh.







Previous Recommend Current page Next
I guess I ought to clarify
Re: Re: I remember the end of that period differently -- paddy Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
T ®

10/28/2005, 01:38:08
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




When I say deprived I mean deprived in terms of getting on with doing normal things in the world.  Stuff like getting careers together, making friends with a bunch of people who were not premies, going to a stack of parties, having lots of sex, just getting on with life.  For many of us we were in our 20s, a time when we should really have been doing all that stuff.  However, for many but not all, we spent our time going to satsang every frigging night, being in ashrams, using up all our vacation allowances going to 'Festivals' in far flung places etc

Personally I enjoyed a lot of that, the premie bit and many times had a real blast, doing meditation, having great experiences and making lots of premie friends.  At the time I thought I was so privileged and 'graced', but now see that I would have preferred to just simply have had a 'normal' 20s. 

It was as a reaction to this super devotional period that many premie either left totally or got spaced out, the spacing out (from being full on premies that is) was a good thing as it allowed a lot of catching up to do.

Hope this clarfies what I meant?

T







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: clarification accepted
Re: I guess I ought to clarify -- T Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
paddy ®

10/28/2005, 16:15:49
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators





The only major difference from my perspective is that I remember the leaving and spacing out being caused by Rawat's command to close the ashrams and stop having satsang and not caused by a personal reaction to the super-devotional period. people weren't leaving in droves and so the ashrams were closed and satsang stopped where I was living. There were more premies than there ever had been as the "residence" in Fig Tree Pocket had been puchased and "service" went on there and premies had come from all over Australia to live nearby.

On the other hand where could the super-devotional period have gone? How often could premies go gaga over his dancing? How much more intense would it be before it got boring for everyone? I have no idea.







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: clarification accepted
Re: Re: clarification accepted -- paddy Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
T ®

10/28/2005, 17:05:46
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Hi Paddy

Nice chatting ....

You raise lots of interesting points but it is late here and I need to get to other things.

One thing though, I do think that if Rawat had not emphasised the devotional aspect at that time (the super devotional period) but rather had emphasised, as he seems to be doing now, the apparent benefits of meditation (apparent) as well as the need for premies to be focussed on helping the world he may well have been far more successful.  Rather he chose to get premies to be focussed on him and his whims, this led ultimately to his failure generally.

I do believe that if he had played his cards differently he may well have had far more followers, been more respected and frankly far richer.

But of course hubris trumped common sense.  And he turned into a failure, as compared to what he may have been.  Thank heavens.

I think his current endeavours such as the Keys and whatnot is to try capture this lost ground (of the 80s and 90s), but he has a big problem - his history.  That can not be hidden.  Just look at the first page of google.com when searching on Prem Rawat.  About 7 of the first 10 entires are either sites created by former followers or refer to his history that Rawat would otherwise like not be revealed.  I simply do not see how Rawat will ever be able to recover from such a history.  Of course this does in any way validate what he is trying to do now.  Ultimately the idea that there is someone is able to show people to some ultimate truth, by whatever means, is entirely bogus, imo.

T  






Modified by T at Fri, Oct 28, 2005, 17:14:28

Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: I think you are right, Jim
Re: I think you are right, Jim -- Joe Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Cynthia ®

10/27/2005, 14:19:47
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




I agree, Jim is right. I have no idea what premies believe now.

Devotion was a job-description at DECA.  Btw, I think the Poconos program was in  '77 or '78.  I was there, but I'm too busy to look up the year right now.  I know it was quite some time before I moved into the ashram.

The other thing about that period was that many of us DECA premies were much too tired to meditate and that never seemed to be an issue.  He had to know that we were working so hard, and lots of premies attempted to do it, but it didn't seem to work because we were too tired to meditate. Service, in all forms, was the priority, everywhere, it seems.  The only way to obtain that dedicated service from premies was to emphasize him as Lord and devotion to him.

The captain came down with an edict at one point that everyone had to attend satsang at DECA, and leave DECA by midnight(!), unless, of course, our service required us to pull all-nighters.

I'm cynical about this though, because I think all that devotion stuff, specifically and in general during that period, was directly related to the captain's desire to have his jet.  Pure greed.  The focus was on him, him, him, and the reward for all that wreched work we did was the darshan, and all the programs.  Devotion.  Period.

Cynth







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Right, the Poconos program was in 1977, not 1979.
Re: Re: I think you are right, Jim -- Cynthia Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Joe ®

10/27/2005, 14:35:39
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Same "super devotional" period, though.






Previous Recommend Current page Next
Poconos
Re: Right, the Poconos program was in 1977, not 1979. -- Joe Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
AJW ®

10/28/2005, 03:49:06
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Hi Joe,

I thought Poconos married an Englishman and moved to Europe. Neil Young sang a song about her. And I think it was in the 19th Century, not the 20th.

Anth the malapropriate mistorian







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Speaking of Poconos....
Re: Poconos -- AJW Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Joe ®

10/28/2005, 11:38:16
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




I think I told the story about flying to LA on a red-eye with my entire ashram from Chicago, and going to the Shriner's Auditorium in LA for Rawat's "birthday celebration."  Anyhow, those were the days when Initiators droned on all day giving satsang, until the audience was suitably bored to tears than when Rawat arrived later, any drivel that came out of his mouth sounded profound. 

Anyhow, I remember some Initiator on the stage giving some dreadfully awful speil, said that "Maharaji touched me deep in the Pocnos."  A lot of people laughed, I recalled.  For some reason it really hit me and I had to leave the room with Pauline Premie, who wet her pants she was laughing so hard.  It was very sacriligious.







Previous Recommend Current page Next
LOL sounds like a tourist ad!
Re: Speaking of Poconos.... -- Joe Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Susan ®

10/28/2005, 14:15:40
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




"Virginia is for Lovers" or whatever. Isn't the Poconos some honeymoon place where couples can soak in heart shaped tubs and be deeply touched?






Previous Recommend Current page Next
Thanks for the chuckle!
Re: LOL sounds like a tourist ad! -- Susan Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Jim ®

10/28/2005, 14:47:48
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Isn't the Poconos some honeymoon place where couples can soak in heart shaped tubs and be deeply touched?

Chuckle chuckle chuckle








Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: Poconos
Re: Poconos -- AJW Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
13 ®

10/28/2005, 14:55:14
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




When I see my daughter Poconos, I ask her if she needs a shovel.

You might have to think about that one, but I wouldn't give it too long.







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: Actually, I think Wow's got a point there
Re: Actually, I think Wow's got a point there -- Jim Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Jethro ®

10/27/2005, 14:01:40
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




When I moved into Acton ashram circa 1979, I distinctly remember being told by the house father that meditation was nolonger important since I had dedicated my life to 'Him' and only service to Him was 'real'.

I also remember being told when you give your life to Him, He liberates the souls of your ancestors 3 generations back and your descendents 3 generations forwards.

All from from Shri Bob Heywood.

Sure we all dust in feet of...etc etc yada yada

Your memory is right on Jim.







Previous Recommend Current page Next
It's all in the Gita Jim.
Re: Actually, I think Wow's got a point there -- Jim Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
AJW ®

10/28/2005, 03:31:09
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Hi Jim,

Hope all is well over there and you've recovered from Europe.

I seem to remember Gita talks about the four types of yoga- let's see if I can remember them- bhakti yoga (devotion) jnani yoga (we interpreted this as meditationor "knowledge" karma yoga (action or "service") and another one (now was that raja, tamas, or satvic- no that was the food)

Anyway, the gita said the highest one of these three or four was bhakti yoga- ie devotion. This was deemed to be the direct route to liberation- and you can see, definitely in the case of the gaga premies, this is not the case.

So whoever wrote the Gita needs to do a new edition.

As one who believed the scriptures and loved the Gita, I took this information to heart.

When I get home I'll try and fish the quote out from my extensive library of scriptures.

As Krishna said, "Remember Rambo and fight."

Anth home tomorrow.






Modified by AJW at Fri, Oct 28, 2005, 03:34:05

Previous Recommend Current page Next
Ah yes, where would I be without the Gita of all things?
Re: It's all in the Gita Jim. -- AJW Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Jim ®

10/28/2005, 09:30:32
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Yes, God blessed the day I first bought the Gita.  What a wonderful turn that was in my life, eh?

Anth, at this point, every small bother and irritation have long since melted from my memory where Europe now glistens like a perfect holiday snow globe.  I keep shaking it upside down and turning it over just to see everything and everyone flying a bit, then falling, slowly, gently back in place.  You and Dot keep landing in Barnes.  Sometimes Dot lands on her feet here and there (tricky in a snow globe) but you, for some reason, always end up lying face up in the middle of the living room floor.  Even though it's a big snow globe, everything's still very small, Anth.  So I couldn't say what it is you're holding.  You do seem to be smiling though.  Well, like I said, everything's very, very small.  Here, I'll shake it again.  That's the fun part.







Previous Recommend Current page Next
LOL. (ot)
Re: Ah yes, where would I be without the Gita of all things? -- Jim Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
AJW ®

10/28/2005, 09:51:46
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Looks like a Linda McCartney vegetarian sausage to me.

Why don't you shake it again?

Anth the veginuendo.







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re:Gita says devotion to Krishna, not Rawat
Re: It's all in the Gita Jim. -- AJW Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
paddy ®

10/28/2005, 16:18:41
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators










Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: Gita says devotion to Krishna, not Rawat
Re: Re:Gita says devotion to Krishna, not Rawat -- paddy Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Steve ®

10/28/2005, 16:30:11
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




But Rawat dressed up as Krishna!  How were we to know it was all a cultural misunderstnding?

 

 

 

 

 

 







Previous Recommend Current page Next
How soon you have forgotten Paddy.
Re: Re:Gita says devotion to Krishna, not Rawat -- paddy Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
AJW ®

10/29/2005, 03:56:04
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Rawat is Krishna (with more power than ever before, remember), and Buddha, and Christ, and all the rest.

Ah but I was so much stupider then, I'm just as stupid nooooooow.

Anth Zimmerman







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: Now is still then...
Re: Now is still then... -- Mike Finch Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Steve ®

10/28/2005, 08:26:36
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Thanks for this Mike - from your site. 

" . . . there came a relief and profound joy with the understanding that the universe itself can be my teacher, and that I can find the love, the ultimate, whatever, within myself without needing the grace of Maharaji, or indeed anybody, other than myself."





Related link: http://www.mikefinch.com/mj/art/etp.htm

Previous Recommend Current page Next
Re: Now is still then...
Re: Now is still then... -- Mike Finch Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
PatD ®

10/28/2005, 14:21:41
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators





I don't think it so much 'trumps' meditation, as that meditation (meaning practising the Knowledge), along with satsang and service, was and is the way to keep that 'channel' clear and unobstructed, so that the grace could flow....

...This belief system has been pretty consistent from the earliest days till now....

This is quite obviously true, & is the only reason Rawat maintains a following; he's never, at bottom, & however he wraps it up in front of an audience, changed his tune. This was clear to me during the many years when I had no connection with his 'work' at all, & just went to Progs/Events once or twice a year or so, as a spiritual tourist. I could afford to do that then, so there were no conflicts between me & my non-premie wife, but if there had been, then I wouldn't have gone.

The times someone phoned me up to say........''Maharaj Ji's going to be in Barcelona next month, we're going, & if you can make it etc, etc'', but I never could (not Barcelona anyway, Rome was generally ok), so there was a little frisson of disappointment, that's all.

I knew I had the eternal connection is the point. That was always the point wasn't it? So the fact that it wasn't possible for everyone to be in the presence of the lord 24/7, wasn't such a big deal for me, & I suspect for many others.

The beauty of being an Oriental Potentate is that you can burn people up, the better to satisfy your desires. Having burnt up the most committed, all the people who did the ashram thing, especially in the US with the DECA project, you're left with the equivalent of sucking moisture out of a stone.

The stones are the only ones left, & as to why we got into it in the 1st place, a question you didn't ask, but I'll answer it anyway....we fell for a fairground trick.

Why people do that as a regular thing, is something I can't answer.








Previous Recommend Current page Next
And Prem Rawat/Guru had this to say about himself...
Re: That was then, this is now . . . -- Dr.wow Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Hilltop ®

10/28/2005, 01:12:56
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Uploaded file
MAYBE.JPG ( bytes)  






Previous Recommend Current page Next
Can you give the reference for this quote??
Re: And Prem Rawat/Guru had this to say about himself... -- Hilltop Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Mike Finch ®

10/28/2005, 04:11:50
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Hi Hilltop

Great quote. Can you give the reference for it (Divine Times, And It Is Divine? date and page number?)

Thanks

-- Mike







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Can you give the reference for this quote?? Sure Thing!
Re: Can you give the reference for this quote?? -- Mike Finch Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Hilltop ®

10/28/2005, 10:58:56
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Hi Mike,

That quote is from Guru Maharaj Ji's Satsang called "The Final Step" at the Shower of Grace, Malibu, California, June 11, 1978.

As printed in the Divine Times June/July 1978, Volume 7, Number 4, Guru Puja Special, Page 36.

Best Thoughts... Hilltop







Previous Recommend Current page Next
Thanks
Re: Can you give the reference for this quote?? Sure Thing! -- Hilltop Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Mike Finch ®

10/28/2005, 12:41:46
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Thanks Hilltop

I remember the Shower of Grace!! That is a real good quote - says it pretty plain!

-- Mike







Previous Recommend Current page Next
His Golden ~ "Shower of Grace" ~ Page 37.
Re: Thanks -- Mike Finch Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Hilltop ®

10/29/2005, 22:53:17
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Hi again Mike,

There are many "good quotes" within this talk by Prem Rawat.

Anyone involved with Prem Rawat really should read "The Final Step" ~ his talk at The Shower of Grace, Malibu, California, June 11, 1978. It's a classic! Soon to be in paperback.

I'd love to post all of it, so everyone could see and read Prem Rawat's words from the past. Prem Rawat is now a motivational speaker & a self made man. And no longer The Living Lord!

I've said it before... It's sad and sick at the same time.

Hilltop

Uploaded file
SCAM.JPG ( bytes)  





Modified by Hilltop at Sun, Oct 30, 2005, 00:17:36

Previous Recommend Current page Next


Forum     Back